영어 동사의 보충절로서 to-부정사와 that절의 의미, 화용적 분석
A Semantic-Pragmatic Analysis of to-infinitive and that-clause as Verb Complement Clauses in English
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to cognitive-functional grammar, it is said that meaning and form in a language are closely related to each other and that a difference in form leads to a difference in function and meaning. From this cognitive-functional perspective, this paper examines the semantic and pragmatic differences between to-infinitive and that-clause as the verb complement clauses in English. An attempt is first made to explore difference in meaning between two clauses in terms of subjectivity and objectivity from the perspective of the interest and involvement about the complement of the main clause subject. And the difference among potentiality, realization and factivity is shown from the perspectives of the realization and non-realization of the complement. It is also shown that the clear difference in meaning exists in directness and indirectness based on clause integration and proximity. Then, it is reviewed that this meaning and form interaction in to-infinitive and that-clause alternation is iconically reflected in the meaning of the subjectivity, objectivity, directness and indirectness.
Abstract
According to cognitive-functional grammar, it is said that meaning and form in a language are closely related to each other and that a difference in form leads to a difference in function and meaning. From this cognitive-functional perspective, this paper examines the semantic and pragmatic differences between to-infinitive and that-clause as the verb complement clauses in English. An attempt is first made to explore difference in meaning between two clauses in terms of subjectivity and objectivity from the perspective of the interest and involvement about the complement of the main clause subject. And the difference among potentiality, realization and factivity is shown from the perspectives of the realization and non-realization of the complement. It is also shown that the clear difference in meaning exists in directness and indirectness based on clause integration and proximity. Then, it is reviewed that this meaning and form interaction in to-infinitive and that-clause alternation is iconically reflected in the meaning of the subjectivity, objectivity, directness and indirectness.
참고문헌 (31)
- 김종도, "인지문법의 토대 Ⅱ" (1999), 박이정
- 이기동, "영어동사의 문법" (1992), 신아사
- Bolinger, D., "Meaning and Form" (1977), Longman
- Bresnan, J., "A Theory of Complementation in English Syntax", 박사, pp.1972
- For-to Complements and if-clauses, "Carstairs, A.", MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics, 147~153, pp.Quarterly Progress Report 109 (1973)
- Dixon, R., "A New Approach to English Grammar, on Semantic Principles" (1991), Clarendon Press
- Dixon, R., "A Semantic Approach to English Grammar" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Givón, T., "Iconicity, Isomorphism, and Non-arbitrary Coding in Syntax in: Iconicity in Syntax", pp.187~219 (1985), John Benjamins
- Givón, T., "Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. 2" (1990), John Benjamins
- Givón, T., "English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction" (1993), John Benjamins
- Givón, T., "English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction" (1993), John Benjamins
- Haiman, J., "The Iconicity of Grammar: Isomorphism and Motivation", Language, 56, pp.515~540 (1980)
- Haiman, J., "Iconic and Economic Motivation", Language, 59, pp.781~819 (1983)
- Haiman, J., "Iconicity in Syntax" (1985), John Benjamins
- Haiman, J., "Natural Syntax-Iconicity and Erosion" (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Hamawand, Z., "For-to Complement Clause in English: A Cognitive Grammar Analysis", Studia Linguistica, 57, pp.171~192 (2003)
- Huddleston, R., "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Jespersen, O., "Gerund and To-infinitive after 'It is of no use' 'It is no good', and It is useless'"", English Studies, 62, pp.156~163 (1965)
- Kirsner, R., "The Role of Pragmatic Inference in Semantics: A Study of Sensory Verb Complements in English", Glossa, 10, pp.200~240 (1976)
- Langacker, R., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Descriptive Application" (1991), Stanford University Press
- Langacker, R., "Concept, Image and Symbol" (1991), Mounton de Gruyter
- Langacker, R., "Consistency, Dependency and Conceptual Grouping", Cognitive Linguistics, 8, pp.1~32 (1997)
- Langacker, R., "Grammar and Conceptualisation" (1999), Mounton de Gruyter
- Mair, C., "Infinitival Complement Clauses in English" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Pesetsky, D., "Infinitives in English", 석사, pp.1992
- Pesetsky, D., "T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences in: Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.355~426 (2001), MIT Press
- Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- Radford, A., "Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Riddle, E., "Some Pragmatic Conditions on Complementizer Choice", CLS, 11, pp.467~474 (1975)
- Stowell, T., "The Tense of Infinitives", Linguistic Inquiry, 13, pp.561~570 (1982)
- Wierzbicka, A., "The Semantics of Grammar" (1988), John Benjamins