National Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program Remains Suboptimal in Korea
2
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: We evaluated the characteristics of the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) and opinions regarding the National Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program (NEQIP). Methods: We surveyed physicians performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy and/or colonoscopy screenings as part of the NCSP via e-mail between July and August in 2015. The 32-item survey instrument included endoscopic capacity, sedation, and reprocessing of endoscopes as well as opinions regarding the NEQIP. Results: A total of 507 respondents were analyzed after the exclusion of 40 incomplete answers. Under the current capacity of the NCSP, the typical waiting time for screening endoscopy was less than 4 weeks in more than 90% of endoscopy units. Performance of endoscopy reprocessing was suboptimal, with 28% of respondents using unapproved disinfectants or not knowing the main ingredient of their disinfectants and 15% to 17% of respondents not following reprocessing protocols. Agreement with the NEQIP was optimal, because only 5.7% of respondents did not agree with NEQIP; however, familiarity with the NEQIP was suboptimal, because only 37.3% of respondents were familiar with the NEQIP criteria. Conclusions: The NEQIP remains suboptimal in Korea. Given the suboptimal performance of endoscopy reprocessing and low familiarity with the NEQIP, improved quality in endoscopy reprocessing and better understanding of the NEQIP should be emphasized in Korea.
Abstract
Background/Aims: We evaluated the characteristics of the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) and opinions regarding the National Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program (NEQIP). Methods: We surveyed physicians performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy and/or colonoscopy screenings as part of the NCSP via e-mail between July and August in 2015. The 32-item survey instrument included endoscopic capacity, sedation, and reprocessing of endoscopes as well as opinions regarding the NEQIP. Results: A total of 507 respondents were analyzed after the exclusion of 40 incomplete answers. Under the current capacity of the NCSP, the typical waiting time for screening endoscopy was less than 4 weeks in more than 90% of endoscopy units. Performance of endoscopy reprocessing was suboptimal, with 28% of respondents using unapproved disinfectants or not knowing the main ingredient of their disinfectants and 15% to 17% of respondents not following reprocessing protocols. Agreement with the NEQIP was optimal, because only 5.7% of respondents did not agree with NEQIP; however, familiarity with the NEQIP was suboptimal, because only 37.3% of respondents were familiar with the NEQIP criteria. Conclusions: The NEQIP remains suboptimal in Korea. Given the suboptimal performance of endoscopy reprocessing and low familiarity with the NEQIP, improved quality in endoscopy reprocessing and better understanding of the NEQIP should be emphasized in Korea.
참고문헌 (26)
- Aesun Shin, "Gastric Cancer Epidemiology in Korea", Journal of Gastric Cancer, 11(3), pp.135~140 (2011), 대한위암학회
- Choi KS, "Performance of different gastric cancer screening methods in Korea: a population-based study", PLoS One, 7, pp.e50041~ (2012)
- Shin A, "Validity of fecal occult blood test in the national cancer screening program, Korea", PLoS One, 8, pp.e79292~ (2013)
- Yoo KY, "Cancer control activities in the Republic of Korea", Jpn J Clin Oncol, 38, pp.327~333 (2008)
- "Education for National Cancer Screening Program" (2015)[URL]
- Lee S, "Gastric cancer screening uptake trends in Korea: results for the National Cancer Screening Program from 2002 to 2011: a prospective cross-sectional study", Medicine, 94, pp.e533~ (2015)
- 차재명, "국내 내시경 질 향상의 과거, 현재, 미래", 대한소화기학회지, 64(6), pp.320~332 (2014), 대한소화기학회
- 차재명, "Endoscopist Specialty Is Associated with High-Quality Endoscopy in Korea", Yonsei Medical Journal, 53(2), pp.310~317 (2012), 연세대학교의과대학
- Park WG, "Quality indicators for EGD", Am J Gastroenterol, 110, pp.60~71 (2015)
- Rex DK, "Quality indicators for colonoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 110, pp.72~90 (2015)
- Rembacken B, "Quality in screening colonoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE)", Endoscopy, 44, pp.957~968 (2012)
- Azmi N, "Evaluation of patient satisfaction of an outpatient gastroscopy service in an Asian tertiary care hospital", BMC Gastroenterol, 12, pp.96~ (2012)
- Jover R, "Clinical practice guidelines:quality of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening", Endoscopy, 44, pp.444~451 (2012)
- Paterson WG, "Canadian consensus on medically acceptable wait times for digestive health care", Can J Gastroenterol, 20, pp.411~423 (2006)
- Lee HY, "Comparing upper gastrointestinal X-ray and endoscopy for gastric cancer diagnosis in Korea", World J Gastroenterol, 16, pp.245~250 (2010)
- Peery AF, "Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update", Gastroenterology, 143(e3), pp.1179~1187 (2012)
- Seeff LC, "How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC’s survey of endoscopic capacity", Gastroenterology, 127, pp.1670~1677 (2004)
- Lucendo AJ, "Gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation and monitoring practices in Spain: a nationwide survey in the year 2014", Endoscopy, 47, pp.383~390 (2015)
- 이창균, "Room for Quality Improvement in Endoscopist-Directed Sedation: Results from the First Nationwide Survey in Korea", Gut and Liver, 10(1), pp.83~94 (2016), 거트앤리버 발행위원회
- Riphaus A, "Endoscopic sedation and monitoring practice in Germany: re-evaluation from the first nationwide survey 3 years after the implementation of an evidence and consent based national guideline", Z Gastroenterol, 51, pp.1082~1088 (2013)
- Repici A, "Balanced propofol sedation administered by nonanesthesiologists: the first Italian experience", World J Gastroenterol, 17, pp.3818~3823 (2011)
- McQuaid KR, "A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures", Gastrointest Endosc, 67, pp.910~923 (2008)
- 박상훈, "A Review of Current Disinfectants for Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Reprocessing", Clinical Endoscopy, 46(4), pp.337~341 (2013), 대한소화기내시경학회
- Zhang X, "Current status of cleaning and disinfection for gastrointestinal endoscopy in China: a survey of 122endoscopy units", Dig Liver Dis, 43, pp.305~308 (2011)
- Radaelli F, "Colonoscopy practice in Italy: a prospective survey on behalf of the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists", Dig Liver Dis, 40, pp.897~904 (2008)
- Ellett ML, "A literature review of the safety and efficacy of using propofol for sedation in endoscopy", Gastroenterol Nurs, 33, pp.111~117 (2010)