본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

잊혀지는 식민지, 다나카 히데미츠와 제국의 망각- <천마>(天馬)의 질문과 <취한 배(酔いどれ船)>의 대답

The Forgotten Colony, Tanaka, Hidemitsu and the Oblivion of Empire - The Question from Cheon-ma(The Horse of Heaven) and the Answer from Chwihan bae(Yoidore-bune/The Drunken Ship)

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Kim, Sa-ryang asked several questions through Cheon-ma(The Horse of Heaven) to a Japanese writer, Tanaka, Hidemitsu when New Order Movement was spreading following the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese war. The question was about the area called Joseon, Joseon language, and Joseon culture. Tanaka did not answer it until 8 years after through Chwihanbae(Yoidore-bune/The Drunken Ship). Japan’s defeat in the war could be one reason of course but the answer that Tanaka gave through Chwihan bae(Yoidore-bune/The Drunken Ship) was full of empty words. In other words, it was just an answer without answer. It said that Tanaka himself was another victim of imperialism. Besides, Tanaka kept expressing that he comprehended well about Joseon, Joseon people, and joseon culture in his work. Every logic in his work was depending on imperialistic orientalism from adoption of spy fiction form, to ignorance, prejudice and misunderstanding about Joseon, Joseon people and Joseon language; furthermore, he expressed his memory that was transformed and fabricated after defeat in the war in his work. He cleverly whitewashed and eliminated the fact that he actively tried to transfer Joseon literature during the colonial period into empire literature. Tanaka’s attitude was closely related to the way how empire regarded colony. The historical fact of Japanese defeat in the war led the postwar Japan to the unexpected direction. Asia, including Joseon, was forgotten, or deleted while the Greater East Asia War was renamed the Pacific War; the logic that Japan and Japanese people except some warlords were another victim was reinforced by this. As a result of looking for the cause of war from inside of Japan, a nationalistic structure that 「inland=Japan」, 「people=Japanese」 was set in. Tanaka’s Chwihan bae(Yoidore-bune/The Drunken Ship) accords to this structure, so-called ‘Oblivion Empire’.

Abstract

Kim, Sa-ryang asked several questions through Cheon-ma(The Horse of Heaven) to a Japanese writer, Tanaka, Hidemitsu when New Order Movement was spreading following the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese war. The question was about the area called Joseon, Joseon language, and Joseon culture. Tanaka did not answer it until 8 years after through Chwihanbae(Yoidore-bune/The Drunken Ship). Japan’s defeat in the war could be one reason of course but the answer that Tanaka gave through Chwihan bae(Yoidore-bune/The Drunken Ship) was full of empty words. In other words, it was just an answer without answer. It said that Tanaka himself was another victim of imperialism. Besides, Tanaka kept expressing that he comprehended well about Joseon, Joseon people, and joseon culture in his work. Every logic in his work was depending on imperialistic orientalism from adoption of spy fiction form, to ignorance, prejudice and misunderstanding about Joseon, Joseon people and Joseon language; furthermore, he expressed his memory that was transformed and fabricated after defeat in the war in his work. He cleverly whitewashed and eliminated the fact that he actively tried to transfer Joseon literature during the colonial period into empire literature. Tanaka’s attitude was closely related to the way how empire regarded colony. The historical fact of Japanese defeat in the war led the postwar Japan to the unexpected direction. Asia, including Joseon, was forgotten, or deleted while the Greater East Asia War was renamed the Pacific War; the logic that Japan and Japanese people except some warlords were another victim was reinforced by this. As a result of looking for the cause of war from inside of Japan, a nationalistic structure that 「inland=Japan」, 「people=Japanese」 was set in. Tanaka’s Chwihan bae(Yoidore-bune/The Drunken Ship) accords to this structure, so-called ‘Oblivion Empire’.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. "田中英光全集 2" (1965), 芳賀書店
  2. "田中英光全集 11" (1965), 芳賀書店
  3. 김재용, "김사량, 작품과 연구 2" (2009), 역락
  4. 다나카 히데미츠, "취한 배" (2003), 소화
  5. 강대민, "부산지역학생운동사", pp.188~198 (2003), 국학자료원
  6. 권 은, "경성 모더니즘 소설 연구 : 박태원 소설을 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2013
  7. 김백영, "일제하 서울에서의 식민권력의 지배전략과 도시공간의 정치학", 박사, 사회학, pp.2005
  8. 김윤식, "한일문학의 관련양상", pp.34~141 (1974), 일지사
  9. 김태준, "일본 문학 속의 한국․한국인상", 일본학, 22, pp.1~19 (2003), 동국대학교 일본학연구소
  10. 김형섭, "田中英光小說硏究 : 朝鮮·中國體驗の作品を中心に", 박사, 일어일문학, pp.2006
  11. 문경연, "좌담회로 읽는 『국민문학』", pp.23~54 (2010), 소명출판
  12. 변학수, "문학적 기억의 탄생", pp.31~41 (2008), 열린책들
  13. 안미영, "태평양전쟁직후 한일(韓日) 지식인의 ‘식민지 조선’에 대한 기억과 은폐된 욕망", 국어국문학, (156), pp.273~302 (2010), 국어국문학회
  14. 와타나베 나오키, "전쟁하는 신민, 식민지의 국민문화-식민지 말 조선의 담론과 표상", pp.349~389 (2010), 소명출판
  15. 이원희, "田中英光の小說に現れた朝鮮", 일본어문학, (21), pp.234~236 (2003), 일본어문학회
  16. 이재봉, "식미지 말기 ‘경성’과 ‘조선’이라는 지방 - 김사량의 「천마」가 제기하는 질문들", 코기토, 73, pp.456~489 (2013), 인문학연구소
  17. 이한정, "일본 작가들이 본 근대 조선", pp.289~318 (2009), 소명출판
  18. 임종국, "친일문학론", pp.105~139 (1966), 평화출판사
  19. 정창석, "피해자의 얼굴, 가해자의 얼굴-소설 ‘天馬’와 ‘취한 배(酔いどれ船)’", 일본학회, 48, pp.203~220 (2001), 일본학회
  20. 제18회 졸업생일동, "乃台事件回想錄", pp.1~7 (1964), 동래고등학교
  21. 秋錫敏, "金史良の「天馬」と田中英光の『?いどれ船』 ― 知識人の群像からみた?? ?", 일어일문학연구, 47, pp.387~404 (2003), 한국일어일문학회
  22. 가와무라 미나토, "<酔いどれ船>の青春ーもう一つの戦中․戦後", pp.5~146 (2000), インバクト出版會
  23. 가와무라 미나토, "植民地文學から在日文學へ-在日朝鮮人文學論序說(1)", 季刊 靑丘, 22, pp.151~159 (1995)
  24. 小林陽一, "總力戰下の知と制度1935-1955 1", pp.12~259 (2002), 岩波書店
  25. 小森陽一, "感情․記憶․戰爭-1935-55年 2", pp.191~234 (2002), 岩波書店
  26. 고모리 요이치, "포스트 콜로니얼", pp.109~ (2002), 삼인
  27. 고야스 노부쿠니, "동아․대동아․동아시아", pp.39~104 (2005), 역사비평사
  28. 미우라 노부타카, "언어제국주의란 무엇인가", pp.86~106 (2005), 돌베개
  29. 吉野孝雄, "文學報國會の時代", pp.138~143 (2008), 河西書房新社
  30. Peter Duus, "帝国という幻想ー大東亜共榮巻の思想と現実", pp.13~40 (1998), 青木書店
  31. 쥴리언 시먼스, "블러디 머더-추리 소설에서 범죄 소설로의 역사", pp.355~ (2012), 을유문화사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (33건)