唐帝國 시기의 牂柯蠻과 牂柯國 - 서남 변경의 ‘蠻’과 ‘國’
“Zhangke Barbarians(柯蠻)” and “Zhangke State(柯國)” in the Tang(唐) Empire - A study on ‘barbarians’ and ‘states’ of the Southwest Borderlands
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article explores the “Zhangke Barbarians” and the state of “Zhangke” that were in the southwest borderlands of Tang Empire. The focus of this study is on the category of “Zhangke Barbarians” and the structure of “Zhangke-state.” The conclusion of this paper can be summarized as following. The first, The most important feature of the “Zhangke state” was the establishment of this small political unit within the unique political and cultural space of the bianjun(邊郡) frontier prefecture of Chinese empires. And the formation of Xie clan (謝氏) the governing elite of Zhangke-guo was none other than the process of the formation of the regional elites, the daxing (大姓, powerful clans) and the yishuai (夷帥,barbarian chiefs). The second, it was identified that the category of “Zhangke Barbarians” was very fluid. For example, “Zhangke-man” had sometimes included Dongxie-man(東謝蠻), Nanxie-man(南謝蠻), Xizhao-man(西趙蠻) which were distinct from Zhangke-man. The third, the category of “Zhangke Barbarians” was not always equal with that of “Zhangke state”, and the territory of “Zhangke-state” had not the fixed size. The fourth, As like the other polities of the southwestern borderlands were, “Zhangke-state” was structured on the hierarchy of barbarian chiefs, governing elites of clans. The tribute-appointment relation with Tang emperor and the participation in the jimifuzhou(羈縻府州) system of Tang Empire was established on that structure.
Abstract
This article explores the “Zhangke Barbarians” and the state of “Zhangke” that were in the southwest borderlands of Tang Empire. The focus of this study is on the category of “Zhangke Barbarians” and the structure of “Zhangke-state.” The conclusion of this paper can be summarized as following. The first, The most important feature of the “Zhangke state” was the establishment of this small political unit within the unique political and cultural space of the bianjun(邊郡) frontier prefecture of Chinese empires. And the formation of Xie clan (謝氏) the governing elite of Zhangke-guo was none other than the process of the formation of the regional elites, the daxing (大姓, powerful clans) and the yishuai (夷帥,barbarian chiefs). The second, it was identified that the category of “Zhangke Barbarians” was very fluid. For example, “Zhangke-man” had sometimes included Dongxie-man(東謝蠻), Nanxie-man(南謝蠻), Xizhao-man(西趙蠻) which were distinct from Zhangke-man. The third, the category of “Zhangke Barbarians” was not always equal with that of “Zhangke state”, and the territory of “Zhangke-state” had not the fixed size. The fourth, As like the other polities of the southwestern borderlands were, “Zhangke-state” was structured on the hierarchy of barbarian chiefs, governing elites of clans. The tribute-appointment relation with Tang emperor and the participation in the jimifuzhou(羈縻府州) system of Tang Empire was established on that structure.
참고문헌 (42)
- "史記", 2995~2996
- "漢書", 1602~
- "後漢書", 2832~
- "三國志", 660~661
- "晉書", 440~
- "隋書", 807~
- "舊唐書", 369~
- "新唐書", 1092~
- "宋史", 14243~
- 黎翔鳳撰梁運華整理, "管子校注", pp.425~426 (2004), 中華書局
- 任乃强, "華陽國志校補圖注", pp.260~261 (1987), 上海古籍出版社出版社
- 许嘉璐安平秋曾枣庄, "二十二史全譯舊唐書", pp.4537~ (2004), 漢語大詞典出版社
- 金希乾, "牂柯名义及古牂族考说", 贵州文史丛刊, 3, pp.65~70 (1984)
- 唐莫尧, "贵州文史论考", pp.8~14 (2000), 贵州教育出版社
- 梁元, "牂柯江考略", 岭南文史, 4, pp.52~54 (2003)
- 李文仪, "牂牁之名当源于思南白鹭洲", 中共铜仁市委党校学报, 1, pp.64~67 (2013)
- 方国瑜, "汉牂牁郡地理考释", 贵州社会科学, 2, pp.55~54 (1980)
- 付艳丽, "唐代牂牁蛮赵氏家族与首领赵国珍事迹考", 贵州民族研究, 2, pp.167~173 (2011)
- 史继忠, "自杞国初探", 贵州文史丛刊, pp.99~ (1980)
- 史继忠, "试论“东谢”․“牂柯蛮”及“西南蕃”等的地理位置和民族成分", 贵州民族学院学报(社会科学版), pp.17~22 (1981)
- 史继忠, "罗甸国非罗氏鬼国辨", 贵州民族研究, 4, pp.109~116 (1982)
- 史继忠, "罗殿国与阿札遗址", 贵州民族研究, 3, pp.55~61 (1991)
- 绍庄友林, "古牂牁讨论述评", 贵州文史丛刊, 2, pp.23~27 (1985)
- 颜建华, "牂柯江流何处寻?——≪史记≫中的牂柯江", 贵阳学院学报(社会科学版), 1, pp.39~41 (2008)
- 颜建华, "大姓”时期的黔中地域", 遵义师范学院学报, 2, pp.8~11 (2010)
- 杨政奎, "牂牁江与夜郎国", 中共铜仁市委党校学报, 4, pp.60~65 (2012)
- 伍文义, "“濮越人”与牂牁․夜郎关系考", 贵州民族研究, 3, pp.138~144 (1989)
- 王燕玉, "夜郎沿革考", 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 4, pp.45~62 (1977)
- 王燕玉, "西汉牂柯郡十七县今地辨", 贵州民族研究, 1, pp.76~90 (1980)
- 王燕玉, "辨罗甸国与罗氏鬼国", 贵州社会科学, 1, pp.61~70 (1984)
- 정면, "龍顔碑를 통해 본 5세기 雲南 ‘西찬’ 세력의 성격", 중국고중세사연구, (18), pp.349~392 (2007), 중국고중세사학회
- 정면, "蜀漢·魏晉 王朝의 南中 지배와 南中大姓", 동북아 문화연구, 1(12), pp.199~232 (2007), 동북아시아문화학회
- 정면, "後漢代 南夷 지역의 邊郡 지배와 ‘南中’·‘南人’ 개념의 출현", 중국사연구, (49), pp.115~150 (2007), 중국사학회
- 정면, "6세기 中國 王朝의 雲南지역 지배와 ‘西爨’ － 爨瓚·爨震 부자의 ‘竊據’와 남북조시기 ‘邊州’의 성격 －", 역사학보, (202), pp.177~216 (2009), 역사학회
- 정면, "南詔와 唐의 경계, 그리고 동아시아 세계질서", 중국학보, (60), pp.195~230 (2009), 한국중국학회
- 정면, "唐代 ‘南中’ 지역과 ‘西爨’ ― ｢爨守忠墓誌｣의 해석을 중심으로 ―", 동양사학연구, (110), pp.89~137 (2010), 동양사학회
- 정면, "'南蠻' 및 '海南'諸國과 隋唐代 中國의 국제관계 - '冊封朝貢關係'를 중심으로", 동북아역사논총, (35), pp.61~118 (2012), 동북아역사재단
- 郑荐, "再说牂牁江", 中共铜仁市委党校学报, 5, pp.70~78 (2014)
- 陈天俊, "罗殿国形成史", 贵州民族研究, 4, pp.117~125 (1982)
- 陈天俊, "罗殿国都邑与阿札城遗址", 贵州民族研究, 3, pp.62~69 (1991)
- 胡克敏, "唐代黔中地区的罗殿国", 贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 3, pp.14~17 (1987)
- 胡克敏, "唐代中后期黔中地区诞生的罗殿国", 贵州文史丛刊, 4, pp.51~52 (1994)