‘南中’ 前史: 古代 西南夷 邊郡 지역 ‘王․侯․君․長’의 소멸
Prehistory of ‘Nan Zhong’: The Extinction of 'King, Marquis, Lord, and Chief' in the Ancient Southwest Barbarian Frontier Region
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the process of extinction of the ‘kings, marquises, lords, and chiefs’ in the ancient Yunnan region before the emergence of prominent clans and barbarian leaders. Through this, it was confirmed that the emergence of prominent clans and barbarian leaders ultimately signified the establishment of the border county system of the Han empire. The expansion of the Han empire into the southwest barbarian region, which began after the strategy of Tang Meng in 135 BCE, led to the extinction of the southwest barbarian ‘king, marquis, lord, and chief,’ and in this process, a new space called ‘Nan Zhong’ appeared. ‘Nan Zhong’ constituted a part of the Han empire but was a space that was neither ‘China’ nor ‘barbarian (southwest barbarian).’ In other words, it was a space where the social order represented by the prominent clans and barbarian leaders operated. Firstly, this article describes the types of ‘barbarians’ who lived in the Nan Zhong region during the Wei, Jin, and Northern and Southern Dynasties periods and the emergence of prominent clans. Although nearly 300 years of border county rule following the southwest conquest of Emperor Wu of Han did not wholly ‘Sinicize’ the barbarians in the Nan Zhong region, it created a native elite group called barbarian leaders and prominent clans. The rebellions in various counties of Nan Zhong and the southern expedition of Zhuge Liang symbolically represented this. Next, it organizes the two meanings held by the southwest barbarian ‘lords and chiefs’ during the Two Han periods and examines their presence. The southwest barbarian ‘lords and chiefs’ seen in the Chinese historical texts were mainly institutional entities formed through the endorsement of the Chinese state. The political existence of such lords and chiefs was each a local lord of their territory while simultaneously being a hegemon of the region, holding several to dozens of settlements with an average scale of about 200 households. Lastly, it examined the process of the extinction of ‘kings, marquises, lords, and chiefs’ centering on the case of the ‘Zangke County’ region. The ‘Han Shu’ “Biography of Southwest Barbarians” shows the figures of several commanders, including Qulan Lord, Dan Zhi Marquis, Tong Bing Marquis, Ye Lang King, Lou Wo Marquis, and Gou Cheng King, who belonged to Zangke County, as mentioned by Sima Qian, and they disappeared from the records after going through four rounds of upheavals. This phenomenon means that the order maintained by the feudal ennoblement no longer existed in the ‘Nan Zhong’ region. However, ‘Nan Zhong’ did not become a part of ‘China,’ uniformly governed by the laws of the Han empire.
Abstract
This paper examines the process of extinction of the ‘kings, marquises, lords, and chiefs’ in the ancient Yunnan region before the emergence of prominent clans and barbarian leaders. Through this, it was confirmed that the emergence of prominent clans and barbarian leaders ultimately signified the establishment of the border county system of the Han empire. The expansion of the Han empire into the southwest barbarian region, which began after the strategy of Tang Meng in 135 BCE, led to the extinction of the southwest barbarian ‘king, marquis, lord, and chief,’ and in this process, a new space called ‘Nan Zhong’ appeared. ‘Nan Zhong’ constituted a part of the Han empire but was a space that was neither ‘China’ nor ‘barbarian (southwest barbarian).’ In other words, it was a space where the social order represented by the prominent clans and barbarian leaders operated. Firstly, this article describes the types of ‘barbarians’ who lived in the Nan Zhong region during the Wei, Jin, and Northern and Southern Dynasties periods and the emergence of prominent clans. Although nearly 300 years of border county rule following the southwest conquest of Emperor Wu of Han did not wholly ‘Sinicize’ the barbarians in the Nan Zhong region, it created a native elite group called barbarian leaders and prominent clans. The rebellions in various counties of Nan Zhong and the southern expedition of Zhuge Liang symbolically represented this. Next, it organizes the two meanings held by the southwest barbarian ‘lords and chiefs’ during the Two Han periods and examines their presence. The southwest barbarian ‘lords and chiefs’ seen in the Chinese historical texts were mainly institutional entities formed through the endorsement of the Chinese state. The political existence of such lords and chiefs was each a local lord of their territory while simultaneously being a hegemon of the region, holding several to dozens of settlements with an average scale of about 200 households. Lastly, it examined the process of the extinction of ‘kings, marquises, lords, and chiefs’ centering on the case of the ‘Zangke County’ region. The ‘Han Shu’ “Biography of Southwest Barbarians” shows the figures of several commanders, including Qulan Lord, Dan Zhi Marquis, Tong Bing Marquis, Ye Lang King, Lou Wo Marquis, and Gou Cheng King, who belonged to Zangke County, as mentioned by Sima Qian, and they disappeared from the records after going through four rounds of upheavals. This phenomenon means that the order maintained by the feudal ennoblement no longer existed in the ‘Nan Zhong’ region. However, ‘Nan Zhong’ did not become a part of ‘China,’ uniformly governed by the laws of the Han empire.
참고문헌 (30)
- "史記", ~
- "漢書", ~
- "後漢書", ~
- "三國志", ~
- "南齊書", ~
- "新唐書", 中華書局本, ~
- 樊绰, "雲南志補注" (1995), 雲南人民出版社
- 乐史, "太平寰宇記" (2008), 中華書局
- 羅貫中, "三國演義" (1989), 三民書局
- 常璩, "華陽國志校補圖注" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
- 金翰奎, "古代中國的世界秩序硏究" (1982), 一潮閣
- 환관, "염철론" (2002), 소명출판
- "吉玄益敎授停年紀念史學論叢", pp.159~190 (1996), 길현익교수정년기념사학논총간행위원회
- 박찬승, "한국에서의 '민족' 개념의 형성", 개념과 소통, (1), pp.79~120 (2008), 한림과학원[DOI]
- 정면, "後漢代 南夷 지역의 邊郡 지배와 ‘南中’·‘南人’ 개념의 출현", 중국사연구, (49), pp.115~150 (2007), 중국사학회
- 정면, "蜀漢·魏晉 王朝의 南中 지배와 南中大姓", 동북아 문화연구, 1(12), pp.199~232 (2007), 동북아시아문화학회
- 정면, "爨蠻’의 출현과 구성 ― ‘西爨白蠻’과 ‘東爨烏蠻’의 구분 문제 ―", 중국고중세사연구, (23), pp.247~304 (2010), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
- 方國瑜, "『中國西南歷史地理考釋』(上)" (1987), 中華書局
- 白族簡史編寫組, "白族簡史" (1988), 雲南人民出版社
- 白翠琴, "魏晉南北朝民族史" (1996), 四川民族出版社
- 田繼周, "秦漢民族史" (1996), 四川民族出版社
- 單文, "兩漢的雲南政策評析", 雲南社會科學, (6), pp.64~70 (1989), 雲南省社會科學院
- 刘金双, "昆明族与滇国关系考——从考古学文化的视角", 雲南社會科學, (4), pp.172~176 (2013), 雲南省社會科學院
- 刘复生, "古代“僰国”地区的僰人及其“消亡”", 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (5), pp.51~59 (2020), 四川大学
- 王继超, ""遑耶"一词的彝语含义及功用考释", 中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (5), pp.80~83 (2007), 中央民族大学
- 王皓浩, "南北朝隋唐时期"獠人"初探", 黑龙江史志, (5), pp.32~34 (2014), 黑龙江省地方志办公室
- 魏德明, "濮族研究", 雲南社會科學, (2), pp.68~74 (1995), 雲南省社會科學院
- 赵心愚, "≪华阳国志≫所记“宾刚徼白摩沙夷”考辨", 『西南民族学院学报』(哲学社会科学版), (1), pp.177~180 (2001), 西南民族大学
- 何光岳, "渠搜, 叟人的来源和迁徙", 思想战线, (1), pp.64~70 (1991), 雲南大學
- 何斯强, "三國․兩晉․南北朝時期的南中大姓與夷帥", 思想战线, (5), pp.68~75 (1987), 雲南大學
