본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

唐 전반기 使臣의 명칭과 실제적 의미 - 招撫의 임무를 중심으로 -

The Official Names of Envoys and Their Actual Significance During the Early Tang Period- with a focus on the Role of Chao-fu -

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study focuses on the meaning and the aim of Chao-fu during the early Tang dynasty concestrating on several instances made by its envoys. The word ‘Chao-fu’ goes beyond the dictionary definition. It originally meant that the emperor of China invited, encouraged, and enlightened different ethnic neighboring countries. But Chao-fu’s real role is to demand foreign relations for the establishment of the tribute system to surrounding countries. Chao-fu is divided into two types. The one is a kind of type that Tang takes a comparatively flexible attitude toward the neighboring countries, while the other is a kind of type that Tang forces the nations to accept its demands by the use of arms. Therefore, in case of the first Chao-fu type, low government officials of six-seven p'in or san-kuan(散官) and hsün-kuan(勳官) were dispatched to the countries. On the contrary, in case of the second Chao-fu type, high officials such as shang-shu(尙書), chieh-tu shih(節度使) or chiang-chün(將軍) were dispatched. In other words, when it fell into the first type, Tang did not mobilize military power, even though the Chao-fu failed. On the other hand, when it fell into the second type, Tang achieved his ends through military expedition if the Chao-fu failed. It was noteworthy that the ultimate goal of Chao-fu was to make the investiture system, but that the process of the system didn’t go smoothly in most cases of Chao-fu at the early Tang dynasty. The truth was that Japan and the ancient Tibet refused the system, while the Xueyantuo, the Western Turks and the Tuyuhun, at first, also tried to refuse the system, but was forced to accept the system facing military threats through the second Chao-fu type from Tang. To sum up, in the first half years of Tang dynasty, the system of the investiture and the tribute demanded and led by Tang had features military rather than cultural and diplomatic.

Abstract

This study focuses on the meaning and the aim of Chao-fu during the early Tang dynasty concestrating on several instances made by its envoys. The word ‘Chao-fu’ goes beyond the dictionary definition. It originally meant that the emperor of China invited, encouraged, and enlightened different ethnic neighboring countries. But Chao-fu’s real role is to demand foreign relations for the establishment of the tribute system to surrounding countries. Chao-fu is divided into two types. The one is a kind of type that Tang takes a comparatively flexible attitude toward the neighboring countries, while the other is a kind of type that Tang forces the nations to accept its demands by the use of arms. Therefore, in case of the first Chao-fu type, low government officials of six-seven p'in or san-kuan(散官) and hsün-kuan(勳官) were dispatched to the countries. On the contrary, in case of the second Chao-fu type, high officials such as shang-shu(尙書), chieh-tu shih(節度使) or chiang-chün(將軍) were dispatched. In other words, when it fell into the first type, Tang did not mobilize military power, even though the Chao-fu failed. On the other hand, when it fell into the second type, Tang achieved his ends through military expedition if the Chao-fu failed. It was noteworthy that the ultimate goal of Chao-fu was to make the investiture system, but that the process of the system didn’t go smoothly in most cases of Chao-fu at the early Tang dynasty. The truth was that Japan and the ancient Tibet refused the system, while the Xueyantuo, the Western Turks and the Tuyuhun, at first, also tried to refuse the system, but was forced to accept the system facing military threats through the second Chao-fu type from Tang. To sum up, in the first half years of Tang dynasty, the system of the investiture and the tribute demanded and led by Tang had features military rather than cultural and diplomatic.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. "舊唐書", ~
  2. "新唐書", ~
  3. "資治通鑑", ~
  4. "唐會要", ~
  5. "冊府元龜", ~
  6. "全唐文", ~
  7. "三國史記", ~
  8. 張九齡, "唐丞相曲江張先生文集" (1936), 中華書局
  9. 李希泌 主編, "唐代詔令集補編" (2003), 上海古籍出版社
  10. "고구려연구재단연구총서15" (2006), 고구려연구재단
  11. "동북아역사재단연구총서21" (2007), 동북아역사재단
  12. 黎 虎, "漢唐外交制度史" (1998), 蘭州大學出版社
  13. 李大龍, "漢唐藩屬體制硏究" (2006), 中國社會科學出版社
  14. 李大龍, "唐朝和邊疆民族使者往來硏究" (2001), 黑龍江敎育出版社
  15. 彭建英, "中國古代羈縻政策的演變" (2004), 中國社會科學出版社
  16. 何茂春, "中國外交通史" (1996), 中國社會科學出版社
  17. 石見淸裕, "唐の北方問題と國際秩序" (1998), 汲古書院
  18. 金子修一, "隋唐の國際秩序と東アジア" (2001), 名著刊行會
  19. 김성규, "미국 및 일본에서 ‘傳統中國의 世界秩序’에 관한 연구사와 그 특징 비교", 역사문화연구, (32), pp.147~181 (2009), 역사문화연구소
  20. 최재영, "唐代長安의 朝貢使節의 변화와 鴻臚寺의 기능", 동북아역사논총, (24), pp.257~299 (2009), 동북아역사재단

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)