소설 「참사 이후, 참사 이전(惨事のあと、 惨事のまえ)」을 통해 본 3.11 동일본대지진
Reflection on 2011 Tōhoku Earthquake and Tsunami Based on the Fiction After the Disaster, Before the Disaster(惨事のあと、惨事のまえ)
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, which took place on March 11th 2011, made scholars of Japanese literature ponder upon the role of literature. As a result, the collection of fiction March Was Made of Yarn(それでも3月は、また) was published. The collection pointed out the problems that arose while the Japanese society and the Japanese government were trying to cope with the disaster. This paper focuses on one work from the collection, “After the Disaster, Before the Disaster”(惨事のあと、惨事のまえ) by David Peace. The writer of the fiction brings the readers back to the time of the 1923 Great Kantō earthquake. This paper looks into the way the writer compared the 1923 earthquake with the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami. It also observes the way the fiction criticizes the society. The name of the main character Akutagawa Ryunosuke(芥川龍之介) is that of a real person in history. It feels as if Ryunosuke in the fiction is the same person as the real Akutagawa. In addition, the writer describes the mass murder of Koreans during the time of the Great Kantō Earthquake. This serious conflict described in the fiction shows the way people expressed their patriotic spirit in the state of exception. At the same time, the writer indirectly criticizes the so-called “unity” of the people, which justified the massacre as a means to minimize confusion amid an emergency. In this way, the fiction is pointing out the changes in the Japanese society after the Tōhoku earthquake.
Abstract
The Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, which took place on March 11th 2011, made scholars of Japanese literature ponder upon the role of literature. As a result, the collection of fiction March Was Made of Yarn(それでも3月は、また) was published. The collection pointed out the problems that arose while the Japanese society and the Japanese government were trying to cope with the disaster. This paper focuses on one work from the collection, “After the Disaster, Before the Disaster”(惨事のあと、惨事のまえ) by David Peace. The writer of the fiction brings the readers back to the time of the 1923 Great Kantō earthquake. This paper looks into the way the writer compared the 1923 earthquake with the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami. It also observes the way the fiction criticizes the society. The name of the main character Akutagawa Ryunosuke(芥川龍之介) is that of a real person in history. It feels as if Ryunosuke in the fiction is the same person as the real Akutagawa. In addition, the writer describes the mass murder of Koreans during the time of the Great Kantō Earthquake. This serious conflict described in the fiction shows the way people expressed their patriotic spirit in the state of exception. At the same time, the writer indirectly criticizes the so-called “unity” of the people, which justified the massacre as a means to minimize confusion amid an emergency. In this way, the fiction is pointing out the changes in the Japanese society after the Tōhoku earthquake.
참고문헌 (9)
- 가토 나오키, "구월, 도쿄의 거리에서", pp.236~244 (2015), 갈무리
- 레베카 솔닛, "이 폐허를 응시하라", pp.346~458 (2012), 펜타그램
- 아쿠타가와 류노스케, "난쟁이 어릿광대의 말", pp.87~90 (2012), 문파랑
- 조경숙, "아쿠타가와 류노스케와 관동대지진", 일본학보, (77), pp.99~109 (2008), 한국일본학회
- 조미경, "일본현대문학자의 동일본대지진과 후쿠시마 원전사고에 대한 대응과 인식 ‒진재(震災)․원전(原電)문학집 『그래도 3월은, 다시(それでも三月は、また)』를 중심으로‒", 일본근대학연구, (44), pp.235~252 (2014), 한국일본근대학회[DOI]
- 최가형, "3.11 동일본대지진 이후의 일본 재난문학 연구", 박사, pp.2016
- 후지타 에미, "동일본대진재와 일본인의 재해의식-언론보도와 피난민을 중심으로-", 석사, pp.2015
- デイヴィッド․ピース, "それでも三月は、また", pp.272~273 (2012), 講談社
- "首相官邸 (菅内閣総理大臣記者会見)" (2011)[URL]
