본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

구니키다 돗포의 작품과 내셔널리즘

Works by Kunikida Doppo and Nationalism

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

本稿は日本で日清戦争、日露戦争という一大事件を契機にナショナリズムがさらに高揚 し、戦争意識が高まるが、その戦争体験が国木田独歩という一人の作家にとってどのような 影響を及ぼしたのかという観点で取り上げられた。 考察の結論を要約すると次のようになる。 第一に、ナショナリズムの日清戦争と日露戦争で明確な違いは、日清戦争でほとんどの知識人が主戦論者だったとすれば、日清戦争の悲惨さを経験した後は反戦論者が出始め たという点だった。 第二に、「愛弟通信」で旅順虐殺事件は検閲の限界もあっただろうが、虐殺に加担し た日本軍をむしろ「勇敢な日本人」と表現した反語的描写と「戦」という文字を深く嫌悪す る文章から、独歩的な戦争観を垣間見ることができた。 第三に、独歩は戦後発表した「酔中日記」や「空知川の岸邊」でも戦後の歪んだ社 会情勢や北海道で他者が存在しない風景の描写から、戦争に対する悲痛な心情を吐露し ていたことが分かった。 ナショナリズムの高揚とともに走った戦争という非正常体験は、勝利にもかかわらず戦後の文 壇を悲惨小説、深刻小説という暗い傾向の小説に飲み込んだ事実だけでも、戦争がどれほ ど残酷で悲惨な結果を生むかが分かる。そのような戦争が作家の人生だけでなく、一国の歴 史の方向、文学の方向も変え, 作家の戦争観も変化させた体験であることが分かった。

Abstract

In this paper, nationalism, a kind of knowledge of Japan, has existed since Meiji Restoration, but it has been further elevated by major events such as the Sino-Japanese War and the Russia-Japan War, raising the awareness of war and dealing with how the war experience affected a writer. The conclusion of the consideration is summarized as follows. First, the distinct difference in nationalism between the Sino-Japanese War and the Russian-Japanese War was that most intellectuals in the Sino-Japanese War were war advocates, but after the misery of the Sino-Japanese War, anti-war proponents began to emerge. Second, the Lushun massacre in "Aeje News might have had a limit of censorship, but the ironic description of the Japanese troops who participated in the massacre as "brave Japanese" and the writing that deeply hates the word "war" gave us a glimpse of the Dotppo-like view of war. Third, it can be seen that Dotppo was also expressing his grief about the war through the description of the distorted social state after the war and the landscape in Hokkaido where no other exists in the post-war period. The fact that the abnormal experience of war, which ran with the rise of nationalism, swept the postwar literary circles with a dark trend of wretched novels and serious novels despite the victory, shows how brutal and miserable the war was. It can be seen that such a war experience is an abnormal experience that changes not only the artist's life, but also the direction of history and literature of a country.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 가라타니 고진, "일본근대문학의 기원", pp.11~ (1996), 민음사
  2. 고려대학교 일본연구센터, "일본문화사전", pp.404~ (2010), 도서출판 문
  3. 오타니 다다시, "청일전쟁 국민의 탄생", pp.189~ (2018), 오월의 봄
  4. 이미경, "가타이의 전쟁고찰", 일본언어문화, pp.393~ (2012), 한국일본언어문화학회
  5. 이미경, "동아시아의 전란 체험과지식체계의 동요", pp.195~ (2023), 단국대학교 일본연구소 HK사업단 기획, 보고사
  6. 하라다 게이이치, "청일·러일전쟁", pp.78~ (2012), 어문학사
  7. 하라 아키라, "청일·러일전쟁 어떻게 볼 것인가", pp.105~ (2015), 살림
  8. 후지무라 미치오, "청일전쟁", pp.13~ (1997), 소화
  9. 呉丹, "国木田独歩と日清戦争-『愛弟通信』の戦争記録", 日中言語文化, 13, pp.25~32 (2020)
  10. 国木田独歩, "定本 国木田独歩三巻", pp.29~ (1978)
  11. 国木田独歩, "定本国木田独歩三巻", pp.23~ (1978)
  12. 国木田独歩, "定本 国木田独歩五巻", pp.11~152 (1983)
  13. 田山花袋, "田山花袋集", 明治文学全集, 67, pp.204~ (1968), 筑摩書房
  14. 平野謙外, "戦争文学全集 3", pp.358~ (1971), 毎日新聞社
  15. 安田武外, "新批評・近代日本文学の構造近代戦争文学6", pp.14~ (1981), 國書刊行會
  16. 有精堂, "時代別日本文学史事典近代編", pp.162~ (1994), 有精堂出版
  17. 清水幾太郎, "現代思想事典", pp.507~ (1964), 講談社
  18. "星野光徳明治の戦争文学"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)