공백화구문에 대한 전역이동분석의 장단점 연구
Against the Movement Analysis of Gapping Constructions.
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to argue that major properties of gapping constructions cannot be uniformly accounted for by the across-the board movement analysis proposed by Johnson (2009). In spite of its several advantages, the analysis still has some conceptual and empirical problems. Instead of the structure [TP [PredP [vP vP and vP]]] for gapping constructions, I propose [TP TP and TP]. I have tried to illustrate that gapping is an ellipsis rule of deleting all the remaining materials except for two contrast pairs in a coordinate structure consisting of two (or more) tensed clauses (TP). I conclude that gapping is a post-syntactic operation, on the basis of the empirical considerations that it is sometimes not constituent-dependent, and that it neglects agreement features of the first conjunct for its application. This paper is incomplete, however, in that there still remains a task of dealing with some problems concerning tense absence of the second conjunct and scope ambiguity of a negative operator.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to argue that major properties of gapping constructions cannot be uniformly accounted for by the across-the board movement analysis proposed by Johnson (2009). In spite of its several advantages, the analysis still has some conceptual and empirical problems. Instead of the structure [TP [PredP [vP vP and vP]]] for gapping constructions, I propose [TP TP and TP]. I have tried to illustrate that gapping is an ellipsis rule of deleting all the remaining materials except for two contrast pairs in a coordinate structure consisting of two (or more) tensed clauses (TP). I conclude that gapping is a post-syntactic operation, on the basis of the empirical considerations that it is sometimes not constituent-dependent, and that it neglects agreement features of the first conjunct for its application. This paper is incomplete, however, in that there still remains a task of dealing with some problems concerning tense absence of the second conjunct and scope ambiguity of a negative operator.
참고문헌 (19)
- Agbayani, B., "Gapping, pseudogapping and sideward movement", Studia Lingusitica, 58, pp.185~211 (2004)
- Chomsky, N., "Minimalist inquiries: The framework, In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Three factors in the design of language", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.1~22 (2005)
- Gazdar, G., "Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 12, pp.155~184 (1981)
- Haegeman, L., "English grammar: A generative perspective" (1999), Blackwell
- Hudson, R., "Incomplete conjuncts", Linguistic Inquiry, 13, pp.547~550 (1982)
- Jackendoff, R. S., "Gapping and related rules", Linguistic Inquiry, 2, pp.21~35 (1971)
- Jayaseelan, K. A., "Incomplete VP deletion and gapping", Linguistic Analysis, 20, pp.64~81 (1990)
- "Case #46: Gapping"[URL]
- Johnson, K., "Gapping is not (VP-) ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 40, pp.289~328 (2009)
- Kobayashi, A., "Constituency in gapping constructions", Linguistic Analysis, 32, pp.184~225 (2002)
- Lasnik, H., "Minimalist analysis" (1999), Blackwell
- Quirk, R., "A comprehensive grammar of the English language" (1985), Longman
- Ross, J. R., "Gapping and the order of constituents, In Progress in Linguistics" (1970), Mouton
- Sag, I., "Deletion and logical form", 박사, pp.1976
- Schwarz, B., "On the syntax of either ... or", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 17, pp.339~370 (1999)
- Siegel, M. E. A., "Gapping and interpretation", Linguistic Inquiry, 15, pp.523~530 (1984)
- Vicente, L., "A note on the movement analysis of gapping", Linguistica Inquiry, 41, pp.509~517 (2010)
- Zoerner, C., "Coordination: The syntax of &P", 박사, pp.1995