본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

서양 개신교 선교사들의 중국어 성경 번역과 쉬운 문어체의 의의

Protestant Bible Translation and the significance of Easy Wenli

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This research examines the changes and characteristics of the literary style of Chinese translated Bible by Western missionaries, and aims to study the missionaries' understanding of the discordance between written and spoken language of the then Chinese society. Bible translation was a crucial duty for missionaries and in order for the Bible to be read and accepted by the Chinese people, comprehending the linguistic situation and background of China of the times was required, in addition to grasping the Chinese language itself. Thus, the translated Bible is valuable not only for understanding missionaries’ awareness toward the Chinese language, but also for realizing the linguistic reality of modern China. The literary styles of the Chinese translated Bibles have changed dramatically through time. The Morrison version, Marshman version, and Delegate version, which were the first complete translated Chinese versions, were all in classic styles. Since then, the Nanjing, Mandarin, and easy classic style versions appeared, under the intention of translating an easy-to-read Bible. In the case of the Union Version, the shift of such literary styles was planned into three types: classic style, easy classic style, and Mandarin style. Such change in literary styles reflects one aspect of the missionaries' efforts to spread the Bible to both the literati and the commoners in China, during the era of discordance between written and spoken language. Missionaries tend to have subdivided the Chinese literary styles, rather than dichotomizing it into written and colloquial language. Division of written styles was made into several stages, or a specific literary style was established in-between written and colloquial styles. This is closely related to the easy classic style that appeared in Chinese translated Bibles during the late 19th century. The easy classic style received great attention from the missionaries due to its accessibility by the commoners for its easiness compared to the classic style, and since it was regarded as an element that can complement the weakness of dialectal differences and the vulgarity of the colloquial style. However, standing in the middle of written and colloquial literary styles, the easy classic style failed to distinguish itself from the normal classic style, and thus eventually declined due to its resemblance to the classic style. Meanwhile, missionaries were burdened with translating the Bible into colloquial style, since there existed a phenomenon where Chinese people belittled colloquialism. Nevertheless, as they gradually focused more to the Mandarin Chinese as China’s lingua franca, colloquialism steadily settled in as the main literary style of Chinese translation of Bibles.

Abstract

This research examines the changes and characteristics of the literary style of Chinese translated Bible by Western missionaries, and aims to study the missionaries' understanding of the discordance between written and spoken language of the then Chinese society. Bible translation was a crucial duty for missionaries and in order for the Bible to be read and accepted by the Chinese people, comprehending the linguistic situation and background of China of the times was required, in addition to grasping the Chinese language itself. Thus, the translated Bible is valuable not only for understanding missionaries’ awareness toward the Chinese language, but also for realizing the linguistic reality of modern China. The literary styles of the Chinese translated Bibles have changed dramatically through time. The Morrison version, Marshman version, and Delegate version, which were the first complete translated Chinese versions, were all in classic styles. Since then, the Nanjing, Mandarin, and easy classic style versions appeared, under the intention of translating an easy-to-read Bible. In the case of the Union Version, the shift of such literary styles was planned into three types: classic style, easy classic style, and Mandarin style. Such change in literary styles reflects one aspect of the missionaries' efforts to spread the Bible to both the literati and the commoners in China, during the era of discordance between written and spoken language. Missionaries tend to have subdivided the Chinese literary styles, rather than dichotomizing it into written and colloquial language. Division of written styles was made into several stages, or a specific literary style was established in-between written and colloquial styles. This is closely related to the easy classic style that appeared in Chinese translated Bibles during the late 19th century. The easy classic style received great attention from the missionaries due to its accessibility by the commoners for its easiness compared to the classic style, and since it was regarded as an element that can complement the weakness of dialectal differences and the vulgarity of the colloquial style. However, standing in the middle of written and colloquial literary styles, the easy classic style failed to distinguish itself from the normal classic style, and thus eventually declined due to its resemblance to the classic style. Meanwhile, missionaries were burdened with translating the Bible into colloquial style, since there existed a phenomenon where Chinese people belittled colloquialism. Nevertheless, as they gradually focused more to the Mandarin Chinese as China’s lingua franca, colloquialism steadily settled in as the main literary style of Chinese translation of Bibles.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. "China centenary missionary conference. China centenary missionary conference records", American tract society, ~ (1907)
  2. Elisabeth Kaske, "The Politics of Language in Chinese Education: 1895~1919" (2008), BRILL
  3. 황지연, "중국어 성경 번역의 역사 —개신교 성경 번역본을 중심으로—", 중국학논총, (38), pp.65~89 (2012), 중국학연구소
  4. 황지연, "중국 근대 성경번역과 백화문의 맥락적 이해—和合本 번역을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 14(4), pp.225~246 (2013), 한국번역학회
  5. Jost Oliver Zetzsche, "The Bible in China: The History of the Union Version Or the Culmination of Protestant Missionary Bible Translation in China" (1999), Monumenta Serica Institute
  6. 이수연, "聖經中譯硏究", 박사, 중어중문학과 중문학전공, pp.2013
  7. 马红莉, "≪官话和合译本≫与≪文理和合译本≫的翻译策略比较", 硕士, 中国语言文学系, pp.2011
  8. Martin, William Alexander Parsons, "The Chinese : their Education, Philosophy, and Letters" (1881)
  9. 石晓岩, "圣经汉译与清末民初语言文字变革", 南京师范大学文学院学报, (4) (2015)
  10. 송강호, "중국어성경과 번역의 역사" (1998), 도서출판 모리슨
  11. Thor Strandenaes, "Principles of Chinese Bible translation: as expressed in five selected versions of the New Testament and exemplified by Mt 5:1-12 and Col 1" (1987), Almqvist & Wiksell International
  12. Thomas Taylor Meadows, "Desultory notes on the government and people of china, and of the chinese language" (1847), W. M. H. Allen and Co.
  13. William Milne, "A retrospect of the first ten years of the Protestant Mission to China(now, in connection with the Malay, denominated, the Ultra-Ganges Missions: Accompanied with Miscellaneous Remarks on the Literature, History, and Mythology of China &c)" (2013), Anglo-Chinese Press
  14. Walter Henry Medhurst, "Reply to Dr. Boone's vindication of comments on the translation of Ephes. I : in the delegates' version of the New Testament: by the committee of delegates, also, a letter on the same subject, from J. Legge, to Dr. Tidman, secretary of the London Missionary Society" (1820), Printed at the Anglo -Chinese Press
  15. 尹延安, "传教士中文报刊译述中的汉语变迁及影响" (2013), 上海交通大学出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)