시각예술영역에서 재능의 의미 탐색: 예술적 재능에 대한 교육계와 예술계의 인식
Meaning of Talent in the Visual Arts : Concepts of Artistic Talent Perceived by Art Teachers and Art Professionals
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recent views in the field of cognitive science highlight the sociocultural influence on human development. In order to explore the meaning of talent in the visual arts perceived in the contemporary Korean sociocultural context, this paper first examines the perceptions of artistic talent of secondary art teachers and art professionals who support the practice of artists in diverse art institutions. Then it compares the perceptions of educators to those of art professionals. This is followed by a discussion of the educational implications. The result of the perception comparison between art teachers and art professionals reveals that the biggest difference is in the scope of what characterizes artistic talent. Whereas art teachers tend to perceive artistic talent as being limited to the personal ability to develop one’s visual expression, art professionals consider it as the social ability to find one’s own way to establish a personally significant position in the art world. This implies that there are different sociocultural influences in the domains of education and art. The limited perception of art teachers implies that the current education system cannot effectively support the artistic talent that students are developing through a wide range of intellectual explorations in diverse social contexts. This paper’s exploration of the meaning of talent in the visual arts perceived in the Korean sociocultural context today constitutes a meaningful effort to extend educators’ views on talent in the visual arts.
Abstract
Recent views in the field of cognitive science highlight the sociocultural influence on human development. In order to explore the meaning of talent in the visual arts perceived in the contemporary Korean sociocultural context, this paper first examines the perceptions of artistic talent of secondary art teachers and art professionals who support the practice of artists in diverse art institutions. Then it compares the perceptions of educators to those of art professionals. This is followed by a discussion of the educational implications. The result of the perception comparison between art teachers and art professionals reveals that the biggest difference is in the scope of what characterizes artistic talent. Whereas art teachers tend to perceive artistic talent as being limited to the personal ability to develop one’s visual expression, art professionals consider it as the social ability to find one’s own way to establish a personally significant position in the art world. This implies that there are different sociocultural influences in the domains of education and art. The limited perception of art teachers implies that the current education system cannot effectively support the artistic talent that students are developing through a wide range of intellectual explorations in diverse social contexts. This paper’s exploration of the meaning of talent in the visual arts perceived in the Korean sociocultural context today constitutes a meaningful effort to extend educators’ views on talent in the visual arts.
참고문헌 (40)
- 강안나, "시각예술 창작공간 지원정책에 대한 연구", 석사, 큐레이터, pp.2009
- 김영나, "오늘의 미술가를 말하다" (2010), 학고재
- 박신의, "예술가 해외거주 프로그램(Artist-in-residence)의 확산과 진화 - 창조도시 구도에서 국가 간 협력 프로그램까지", 미술이론과 현장, 0(6), pp.123~145 (2008), 한국미술이론학회
- 박연숙, "상호작용성(Interactivity)과 리좀(Rhizome)적 작품체계: 디지털 이미지를 중심으로", 미술이론과 현장, 0(9), pp.33~57 (2010), 한국미술이론학회
- 심상용, "글로벌 아트페어(Global Art Fair) 비평적 읽기", 미술이론과 현장, 0(6), pp.51~76 (2008), 한국미술이론학회
- 안선, "유휴산업시설의 미술창작공간 활용방안 연구", 석사, 문화기획, pp.2008
- 미술창작스튜디오 운영 활성화 방안, "양건열", 한국문화관광연구원, ~ (2004)
- 양현미, "국민정부시기 미술진흥정책의 성과와 한계", 미술이론과 현장, 0(1), pp.55~66 (2003), 한국미술이론학회
- 오신환, "서울시 컬처노믹스(Culturenomics) 문화정책에 관한 연구 : 하이서울페스티벌과 예술창작공간조성을 중심으로", 석사, 아ㆍ태지역연구학, pp.2009
- 오은경, "문화이론과 문학연구" (2008), 연세대학교 출판부
- "Social Art : 동시대 미디어아트에 있어 소셜아트의 개념정리와 특성" (2012), 유준성[URL]
- 한국의 대안공간 실태 연구, "이동연", (사)문화사회연구소, ~ (2007)
- 이현주, "예술영재의 개인 및 환경적 특성 탐색: 음악, 미술, 무용영재를 중심으로", 영재교육연구, 20(2), pp.547~570 (2010), 한국영재학회
- "Social Art: 국내외 예술가들의 소셜 활용과 분석" (2012), 이혜원[URL]
- 장동광, "현대미술에 있어서 ‘복제’의 개념과 전시규범의 문제-《살바도르 달리 탄생 100주년 특별전》의 전시물 <성경> 연작을 중심으로", 미술이론과 현장, 0(2), pp.169~190 (2004), 한국미술이론학회
- 조형준, "디지털 문화: 기술과 예술은 새로 통합되는가?", <디지털 시대와 현대미술의 위상I> 미술세계, 2, pp.40~41 (2000)
- 진중권, "미디어아트 - 예술의 최전선" (2009), 휴머니스트
- 예술강사 활동여건 개선을 위한 실태조사, "한국문화예술교육진흥원", 한국문화예술교육진흥원, ~ (2009)
- 한수연, "예술영재교육의 의미와 방향", 교육원리연구, 11(1), pp.63~99 (2006)
- 문화예술인 실태조사, "허은영", 문화체육관광부 & 한국문화관광연구원, ~ (2010)
- Clark, G., "미술 영재 교육: 이론과 실제" (2008), 미진사
- Cohn, S., "What is giftedness? A multidimensional approach. In A. H. Kramer(Ed.), Gifted Children: Challenging their potential", pp.33~45 (1981), Trillium Press
- Costantino, T., "An interdisciplinarydesign studio: How can art and engineering collaborate to increase students’creativity?", Art Education, 63(2), pp.49~53 (2010)
- Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Society, culture, and person: a system view, In The nature of creativity", pp.325~339 (1988), Cambridge University Press
- Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery andinvention" (1996), Harper Collins
- Efland, A. D., "Postmodern art education : An approachto curriculum" (1996), NAEA
- Efland, A. D., "Art and cognition : Integrating the visual arts in the curriculum" (2002), Teachers College Press
- Eisner, E., "Educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of schoolprograms" (1994), Prentice Hall
- Gagné, F., "Giftedness and talent : Reexamining a reexamination of thedefinitions", Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(3), pp.103~112 (1985)
- Gagné, F., "Understanding the complex choreography of talent developmentthrough DMGT-based analysis, In International handbook of gifted and talented", pp.67~79 (2000), Elsevier Science Ltd
- Gardner, H., "Multiple intelligences: Implications for art and creativity, In Artistic Intelligences: Implications for Education", pp.11~27 (1990), Teachers College Press
- Granott, N., "When minds meet: Interactions, coincidence, anddevelopment in domains of ability, In Mindin context: Interactionist perspectives on human intelligence", pp.171~201 (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Hurwitz, A., "Children and their art: Methods for the elementaryschool" (2001), Harcourt College Publishers
- Manovich, L., "The Language of New Media" (2001), The MIT Press
- Pariser, D., "Graphic development in artistically exceptional children", pp.115~131 (1997), National Art Education Association
- Renzulli, J. S., "What makes giftedness: A reexamination of the definition of thegifted and talented" (1979), Ventura Country Superintendent of schoolsOffice
- Tannenbaum, A., "Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives" (1983), Macmillan
- Winner, E., "Invented worlds: The psychology of the arts" (1982), Harvard University Press
- Zettel, J., "State provisions for educating the gifted and talented, In The gifted and the talented: Their education and development(78th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education)" (1979), University of Chicago Press
- Zimmerman E. (Ed. )., "예술·음악 영재학생" (2008), 학지사