증언의 맥락과 의미화: 한국, 대만, 일본의 ‘일본군 위안부’ 다큐멘터리 비교
The Context & Signification of Testimony: Comparison of Documentaries on Japanese Military ‘Comfort Women’ produced by Korea, Taiwan and Japan
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Context & Signification of Testimony: Comparison of Documentaries on Japanese Military ‘Comfort Women’ produced by Korea, Taiwan and Japan Oh, Young-Suk This paper contextualized the different texture and meaning revealed in the midst of representation of comfort women through the comparative analysis of documentary films on ‘comfort women’ which were produced by Korea, Taiwan and Japan. The framing methods of comfort women survivors is overlapped, or differentiated from each other according to the awareness within society and the nation’s identity, and the government’s role. This paper had a discussion about one’s eyes and emotion involved in sharing and difference, and East Asian contexts of politics and ethics. The Korean film director Byun’s films are discriminative in that his films realize comfort women’s testimony as the process of growth into a social agent making their own voice other than comfort women victims’ being the object of compassion. The testimony of the former comfort women victims in the films becomes a performative stage in which they raise up their own distress into the expression of social wounds. In addition, there appears an excessive subjectivation phenomenon in which comfort women survivors are self-conscious. This reflects a desperate situation where they have no choice but to be an activist who performs a new history writing herself under the circumstances where the government fails to properly play its corresponding role in comparison with the people’s strong will for nationalism. In contrast, Japanese documentary puts more emphasis on interviews including detailed stories of victims instead of providing the historical information related to comfort women system. Main focus is striving to try discover individual human’s portrait hidden behind a group. Comparing to Byun’s documentary, the comfort women survivors seem to be relatively free from the camera. In addition, activists’ voices are minimized. Such a representation method has a strategic meaning of breaking through the Japanese government’s attitude of not taking into account the individual victims at all but putting nation-to-nation relations ahead of everything in handling the issue of compensation for comfort women. Although the historical trajectory of Taiwan was similar to that of Korea, but Taiwanese documentary film shows the difference in that emotional aspects of victimized women such as distress and grief are highlighted. Taiwanese film shows the tendency to approach comfort women’s suffering as the issue of a wounded citizen due to warfare other than the issue of nationality. In addition, they tend to give a lot more weight to understanding and consolation of an individual’s pain rather than putting emphasis on collective power for change. The 증언의 맥락과 의미화: 한국, 대만, 일본의 ‘일본군 위안부’ 다큐멘터리 비교 175 emotion of sadness, which dominates film, belongs to psychological reality of Taiwanese who have been under the long political suppression, together with relatively weak nationalism, complex sentiment toward Japan, and unclear state identity.
Abstract
The Context & Signification of Testimony: Comparison of Documentaries on Japanese Military ‘Comfort Women’ produced by Korea, Taiwan and Japan Oh, Young-Suk This paper contextualized the different texture and meaning revealed in the midst of representation of comfort women through the comparative analysis of documentary films on ‘comfort women’ which were produced by Korea, Taiwan and Japan. The framing methods of comfort women survivors is overlapped, or differentiated from each other according to the awareness within society and the nation’s identity, and the government’s role. This paper had a discussion about one’s eyes and emotion involved in sharing and difference, and East Asian contexts of politics and ethics. The Korean film director Byun’s films are discriminative in that his films realize comfort women’s testimony as the process of growth into a social agent making their own voice other than comfort women victims’ being the object of compassion. The testimony of the former comfort women victims in the films becomes a performative stage in which they raise up their own distress into the expression of social wounds. In addition, there appears an excessive subjectivation phenomenon in which comfort women survivors are self-conscious. This reflects a desperate situation where they have no choice but to be an activist who performs a new history writing herself under the circumstances where the government fails to properly play its corresponding role in comparison with the people’s strong will for nationalism. In contrast, Japanese documentary puts more emphasis on interviews including detailed stories of victims instead of providing the historical information related to comfort women system. Main focus is striving to try discover individual human’s portrait hidden behind a group. Comparing to Byun’s documentary, the comfort women survivors seem to be relatively free from the camera. In addition, activists’ voices are minimized. Such a representation method has a strategic meaning of breaking through the Japanese government’s attitude of not taking into account the individual victims at all but putting nation-to-nation relations ahead of everything in handling the issue of compensation for comfort women. Although the historical trajectory of Taiwan was similar to that of Korea, but Taiwanese documentary film shows the difference in that emotional aspects of victimized women such as distress and grief are highlighted. Taiwanese film shows the tendency to approach comfort women’s suffering as the issue of a wounded citizen due to warfare other than the issue of nationality. In addition, they tend to give a lot more weight to understanding and consolation of an individual’s pain rather than putting emphasis on collective power for change. The 증언의 맥락과 의미화: 한국, 대만, 일본의 ‘일본군 위안부’ 다큐멘터리 비교 175 emotion of sadness, which dominates film, belongs to psychological reality of Taiwanese who have been under the long political suppression, together with relatively weak nationalism, complex sentiment toward Japan, and unclear state identity.
참고문헌 (20)
- 스즈키 세이준, "작부 이야기(春婦傳)", ~ (1965)
- 이마무라 쇼헤이, "가라유키상 唐行きさん(からゆきさん)", ~ (1975)
- 야마타니 데츠오, "오끼나와의 할머니(沖縄のハルモニ)", ~ (1979)
- 변영주, "낮은 목소리", ~ (1994)
- 변영주, "낮은 목소리․2", ~ (1997)
- 변영주, "숨결", ~ (1999)
- 양 지아원, "50년간의 비밀(阿媽的秘密―台籍 ‘慰安婦’的故事", ~ (1998)
- 도이 토시쿠니, "기억과 함께 산다(“記憶”と生きる)", ~ (2015)
- 박유하, "제국의 위안부", pp.1~328 (2013), 뿌리와이파리
- 변영주, "아시아에서 여성으로 산다는 것: 여성감독 변영주의 필름 인터뷰", pp.1~222 (1995), 화평사
- 양현아, "근대를 다시 읽는다 2: 한국 근대 인식의 새로운 패러다임을 위하여", pp.415~450 (2006), 역사비평사
- 정민아, "한국 다큐멘터리 영화의 오늘: 장르, 역사, 매체", pp.87~109 (2016), 본북스
- 슬라보예 지젝, "부정적인 것과 함께 머물기", pp.1~463 (2007), b
- Belinda Smaill, "The Documentary: Politics, Emotion, Culture" (2010), Palgrave Macmillan
- Carol Gluck, "Ruptured Histories: War, Memory, and the Post-Cold War in Asia", pp.47~77 (2007), Harvard University Press
- "History of Asia: Why is the relationship between Japan/Taiwan and Japan/Korea so much different?" (2015)[URL]
- Felman, Shoshana, "Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History", pp.1~56 (1991), Routledge
- Kuo Li-hsin, "Documenting Taiwan on Film: Issues and Methods in New Documentaries", pp.186~195 (2012), Routledge
- Monique Scheer, "Are emotions a kind of practice (and is that what makes them have a history?", History & Theory, 51, pp.193~220 (2012)
- "News: Filmmaker wants Japan to remember the ‘comfort women’" (2015)[URL]
