본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

근대 국가 형성과 운하 건설 ― 빌헬름 제국기를 중심으로 ―

The Modern State-Building and Construction of Canal during the Wilhelmine Empire

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

In the first half of the nineteenth century, the canal seemed out of date, but it was revived during the Wilhelmine Empire. The Wilhelmine Empire is characterized not only by the huge network of railroads, but also by the construction of a lot of canals. The most salient of those was Mittellandkanal, which combined the Rhine and the Elbe, that is the western part of Preussen and eastern part of Preussen. By analysing the debate regarding the canal construction boom, I want to show how the construction of the canal network, which was exceptionally active in Wilhelmine Germany, was influenced by the condition of modern state-building during the Wilhelmine Empire. As a result, it turned out that the debate on how to construct a broad canal system was neither focused on public interest, nor made in a systematic or neutral way. All of the participants fought against each other simply based on their own interest. The government, which must be above all these private interest conflicts, was obsessed with the nationalistic rhetoric. In regards to economic profitability, the canal turned out to be almost ineffective. We can conclude that the construction boom of the canal was the result of an underdeveloped political system during the Wilhelmine Empire when the public sphere was not sound and each party functioned only as the lobbyist of each interest group. Therefore, it was quite natural that the canal was financial disaster.

Abstract

In the first half of the nineteenth century, the canal seemed out of date, but it was revived during the Wilhelmine Empire. The Wilhelmine Empire is characterized not only by the huge network of railroads, but also by the construction of a lot of canals. The most salient of those was Mittellandkanal, which combined the Rhine and the Elbe, that is the western part of Preussen and eastern part of Preussen. By analysing the debate regarding the canal construction boom, I want to show how the construction of the canal network, which was exceptionally active in Wilhelmine Germany, was influenced by the condition of modern state-building during the Wilhelmine Empire. As a result, it turned out that the debate on how to construct a broad canal system was neither focused on public interest, nor made in a systematic or neutral way. All of the participants fought against each other simply based on their own interest. The government, which must be above all these private interest conflicts, was obsessed with the nationalistic rhetoric. In regards to economic profitability, the canal turned out to be almost ineffective. We can conclude that the construction boom of the canal was the result of an underdeveloped political system during the Wilhelmine Empire when the public sphere was not sound and each party functioned only as the lobbyist of each interest group. Therefore, it was quite natural that the canal was financial disaster.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Anderas Kleinebenne, "Strasse mit Vorfahrt: 100 Jahre Dortmund-Ems-Kanal" (1999), Klartext
  2. Herbert Liedel, "150 Jahre Alter Kanal" (1996)
  3. Walther Lotz, "The present significance of German inland Waterways", Annals of the American Academy of political and social science, 31, pp.246~251 (1908)
  4. Gustav Grosse, "Der Elbe-Spree-Kanal zwischen Dresden und Berlin" (1869), Kortkampf
  5. Elbe-Ostsee-Kanal-Verein, "Der Elbe-Ostsee-Kanal und seine wirtschaftliche Bedeutung" (1893)
  6. Ernst von Eynern, "Zwanzig Jahre Kanalkämpfe", pp.8~ (1901), Deutscher Verlag
  7. Hannelore Horn, "Der Kampf um den Bau des Mittellandkanals" (1964), Westdeutscher Verlag
  8. David Blackbourn, "The Conquest of Nature", pp.165~167 (2006), WW.Norton & Co.
  9. "Der Elbe-Spree-Kanal zwischen Dresden und Berlin", pp.21~ (1869)
  10. August Meitzen, "Die Frage des Kanalbaues in Preussen, Separatabdruck aus dem Schmollers Jahrbuch" (1885), Duncker & Humboldt
  11. Reichsverkehrsministerium, "Der Mittellandkanal", pp.23~ (1938), Volk u. Reich Verlag
  12. Elbe-Ostsee-Kanalbau-Verein, "Der Elbe-Ostsee-kanal und seine Wirtschaftliche Bedeutung", pp.4~ (1893)
  13. Franz Ulrich, "Staffeltarife und Wasserstrasse", pp.148~ (1893), Julius Springer Verlag
  14. "Gesetzentwurf betreffend den Bau eines Schiffahrtskanals vom Rhein bis zur Elbe", Aktenstueck Nr., 102, pp.2223~
  15. Leo Sympher, "Transportkosten auf Eisenbahnen und Kanälen", pp.1~ (1885), Ernst & Korn
  16. Fritz Geck, "Der binnenländische Rhein-Weser-Elbe-Kanal", pp.6~ (1891)
  17. Wolfgang König, "Wilhelm II. und die Moderne: Der Kaiser und die technisch-industrielle Welt", pp.93~ (2007), Schöningh
  18. "Statistik des deutschen Reichs", pp.14~ (1909), Binnenschiffahrt
  19. H.G.Moulton, "Waterways versus Railways", pp.176~ (1912), Houghton Miffin Company
  20. Edwin J. Clapp, "The Navigable Rhine", pp.1~ (1911), Houghton Miffin

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)