본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

역사주의 이데올로기와 역사학 ― 랑케의 역사담론을 중심으로 ―

A Critique of Ranke's Historical Discourse and Historicism

1

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This present thesis criticizes the ideology of historicism which contains Ranke's historical discourse in the context of forming modern history. Here, empirical epistemology, nationalism and linear temporality are treated as primary elements of historicism. Opposing to Hegel's idealistic philosophy of history, Ranke established the empirical historiography which used critical research of materials as its methodology. There were hegelian historicist principles, however, in his historical discourse. And he had empirical epistemology in common with Hegel, which by confusing real-object with thought-object, insists that historiography represents the actual process of reality. But rather it is a form of representation that informs a certain knowledge through language. For Ranke, nation-state exclusively has historicity and political legitimacy. In his view, hindering its politics is antinational, simultaneously antihistorical, and it is regarded as nothing but a accidental episode in a nation-state's narrative. This way of thinking reveals the relationship of complicity between historicist historiography and nationalism. The ideology of nation-state interpellates individual as the subject of nation. In this process, their different social conditions are eliminated. The historiography, which has had historicist ideology in it, has been a source of ideology of the nation-state. Historicism postulates a linear and homogeneous time. This concept of time is one of the fundamental elements in arranging and colonizing nations or groups of society according to their extent of historical development. Thus rupturing the historicist concept of time is called for the overthrowing of that master discourse. Althusser, in his project of the reestablishment of Marxism, suggested the Marxist historical time on the Marxist totality. The decentered Marxist whole in which each instance has its own relatively autonomous time, simultaneously exists as a specific history determined by relations of relative effectivity within the whole, and yet they also encounter into each other. This Althusser's concept of time is to be a necessary element in overcoming historicism, thus in re-constructing the theoretical system of history.

Abstract

This present thesis criticizes the ideology of historicism which contains Ranke's historical discourse in the context of forming modern history. Here, empirical epistemology, nationalism and linear temporality are treated as primary elements of historicism. Opposing to Hegel's idealistic philosophy of history, Ranke established the empirical historiography which used critical research of materials as its methodology. There were hegelian historicist principles, however, in his historical discourse. And he had empirical epistemology in common with Hegel, which by confusing real-object with thought-object, insists that historiography represents the actual process of reality. But rather it is a form of representation that informs a certain knowledge through language. For Ranke, nation-state exclusively has historicity and political legitimacy. In his view, hindering its politics is antinational, simultaneously antihistorical, and it is regarded as nothing but a accidental episode in a nation-state's narrative. This way of thinking reveals the relationship of complicity between historicist historiography and nationalism. The ideology of nation-state interpellates individual as the subject of nation. In this process, their different social conditions are eliminated. The historiography, which has had historicist ideology in it, has been a source of ideology of the nation-state. Historicism postulates a linear and homogeneous time. This concept of time is one of the fundamental elements in arranging and colonizing nations or groups of society according to their extent of historical development. Thus rupturing the historicist concept of time is called for the overthrowing of that master discourse. Althusser, in his project of the reestablishment of Marxism, suggested the Marxist historical time on the Marxist totality. The decentered Marxist whole in which each instance has its own relatively autonomous time, simultaneously exists as a specific history determined by relations of relative effectivity within the whole, and yet they also encounter into each other. This Althusser's concept of time is to be a necessary element in overcoming historicism, thus in re-constructing the theoretical system of history.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Dipesh Chakrabarty, "Provincialzing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference" (2007), Princeton University Press
  2. F. R. Ankersmit, "Historicism: An Attempt at Synthesis", History and theory, 34(3) (1995)
  3. Friedrich Jaeger, "Geschichte des Historismus : Eine Einführung" (1992), Beck
  4. Giorgio Agamben, "Infancy and History" (1993), Verso
  5. Helen P. Liebel, "The Enlightenment and the Rise of Historicism in German Thought", Eighteenth-Century Studies, 4(4) (1971)
  6. Jörn Rüsen, "Konfigurationen des Historismus: Studien zur deutschen Wissenschaftskultur" (1993), Suhrkamp
  7. Krieger, Leonard, "Elements of Early Historicism: Experience, Theory, and History in Ranke", History and Theory, 14(4) (1975)
  8. Leopold von Ranke, "Idee der Universalhistorie, In Historische Zeitschrift Bd. 178" (1954)
  9. Leopold von Ranke, "On the Relation of History and Philosophy, In The Theory and Practice of History: Leopold von Ranke"
  10. Leopold von Ranke, "The Pitfalls of a Philosophy of History, In The Theory and Practice of History: Leopold von Ranke" (1973), The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc
  11. Leopold von Ranke, "Die grossen Mächte - Politisches Gespräche, Göttingen" (1950), Vandenhoeck & Rufrecht
  12. Louis Althusser, "Reading Capital, Ben Brewster trns" (1997), Verso
  13. Louis Althusser, "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatus (Notes Towards an Investigation), In Lenin and Philosophy and other essays" (2001), Monthly Review Press
  14. Louis Althusser, "For Marx" (1977), Verso
  15. Ranajit Guha, "The Prose of Counter Insurgency, In Selected Subaltern Studies" (1988), Oxford University Press
  16. Ranajit Guha, "Dominance without Hegemony -History and Power in Colonial India" (1997), Harvard University Press
  17. Reinhard Koselleck, "Vergangene Zukunft" (1989), Suhrkamp
  18. Reinhard Koselleck, "지나간 미래" (1999), 문학동네
  19. Robert J. C. Young, "White Mythology: Writing History and the West, 2nd Edition" (2004), Routledge
  20. 김용규, "백색신화: 서양이론과 유럽중심주의 비판" (2008), 경성대출판부
  21. 게오르그 G. 이거스, "독일 역사주의" (1992), 박문각
  22. 게오르크 헤겔, "세계사의 철학" (2009), 지만지
  23. 에티엔느 발리바르, "민족형태: 그 역사와 이데올로기, In 이론 6호" (1993), 이론
  24. 헤이든 화이트, "19세기 유럽의 역사적 상상력 - 메타 역사" (1991), 문학과 지성사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)