1945년 이후 독일 역사학계의 역사주의 담론
Historicism Discourse of German Historians since 1945
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper introduced the historicism discourse in the German historian Zunft since 1945. It is characterized by the poverty of philosophical-theoretical reflections which try to relate the historicism with problems of identity of discipline of history and its function. Among most German historians, the historicism has been regarded as negative tradition which the 19th century German historiography left, and as obsolete. They assure that today is the epoch of new discipline of history, that is, modern social history. Recently, some German historian criticized such predominant view. According to them:1. The historicism discourse in the historian Zunft developed undesirably, compared to such discourses in another disciplines of cultural sciences which consider the historicism-problem such as value relativism, which the discipline of history caused, always actual in the modern world. 2. The differences between ‘old’ historicistical discipline of history and ‘modern’ social history has been so overemphasized that it is predominant to suppose that the later surpassed the former. But there is also similarities between them. 3. The social history is also a kind of historicistical discipline of history, because it depends upon the modern concept of history, that is, 'the History' so much as the old form of historical research and historiography. In the same context, a new annalistic model, which tries to surmount the historicism by means of deconstructing the modern concept of history, was suggested.
Abstract
This paper introduced the historicism discourse in the German historian Zunft since 1945. It is characterized by the poverty of philosophical-theoretical reflections which try to relate the historicism with problems of identity of discipline of history and its function. Among most German historians, the historicism has been regarded as negative tradition which the 19th century German historiography left, and as obsolete. They assure that today is the epoch of new discipline of history, that is, modern social history. Recently, some German historian criticized such predominant view. According to them:1. The historicism discourse in the historian Zunft developed undesirably, compared to such discourses in another disciplines of cultural sciences which consider the historicism-problem such as value relativism, which the discipline of history caused, always actual in the modern world. 2. The differences between ‘old’ historicistical discipline of history and ‘modern’ social history has been so overemphasized that it is predominant to suppose that the later surpassed the former. But there is also similarities between them. 3. The social history is also a kind of historicistical discipline of history, because it depends upon the modern concept of history, that is, 'the History' so much as the old form of historical research and historiography. In the same context, a new annalistic model, which tries to surmount the historicism by means of deconstructing the modern concept of history, was suggested.
참고문헌 (47)
- "Historismus, Historizismus, In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 3", pp.1141~1147 (1974), Schwabe
- Harry Ritter, "Historicism, Historism, In Dictionary of Concepts in History", pp.183~188 (1986), Greenwood Press
- Thomas Nipperdey, "Historismus und Historismuskritik heute, In idem, Gesellschft, Kultur, Theorie", pp.59~73 (1976), Vanhoeck & Ruprecht
- Jörn Rüsen, "Konfigurationen des Historismus", pp.17~ (1993), Suhrkamp
- Karl Heussi, "Die Krise des Historismus", pp.15~ (1932), Mohr
- Harry Ritter, "Historicism, Historism, In Dictionary of Concepts in History", pp.183~
- Gunter Scholtz, "Das Historismusproblem und die Geistenwissenschaften im 20. Jahrhundert", Archiv für Kulturgeschichte, 71, pp.463~486 (1989)
- George G. Iggers, "독일역사주의", pp.25~ (1968), 박문당
- George G. Iggers, "New Directions in European Historiography", pp.80~122 (1975), Wesleyan Univ
- George G. Iggers, "Neue Geschichtswissenschaft. Vom Historismus zur historischen Sozialwissenschaft. Ein internationaler Vergleich" (1978), Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag
- George G. Iggers, "20세기 사학사" (1996), 푸른역사
- Wolfgang Mommsen, "Die Geschichtswissenschaft jenseits des Historismus" (1971), Droste
- Otto Gerhard Oexle, "Meineckes Historismus, In Historismus in den kulturwissenschaften. Geshcichtskonzepte, historische Einschätzungen, Grundlagenprobleme", pp.191~192 (1996), Böhlau
- Otto Gerhard Oexle, "Krise des Historismus–Krise der Wirklichkeit. Wissenschaft, Kunst und Literatur 1880–1932" (2007), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Jörn Rüsen, , Konfigurationen des Historismus, 18~
- George G. Iggers, "New Directions in European Historiography", pp.80~122
- Horst Walter Blanke, "Historiographiegeschichte als Historik", pp.47~ (1991), Frommann-Holzboog
- Jörn Rüsen, "Konfigurationen des Historismus", pp.18~
- Hans U. Wehler, "Das Deutsche Kaiserreich 1871-1918", pp.11~ (1973), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Jürgen Kocka, "Historische Sozialwissenschaft heute, In Perspektiven der Gesellschaftsgeschichte", pp.19~22 (2000), C. H. Beck
- Annette Wittkau, "Historismus. Zur Geschichte des Begriffs und des Problems", pp.11~ (1994), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Hans U. Wehler, "Das Deutsche Kaiserreich", pp.12~
- Jörn Rüsen, "Konfigurationen des Historismus", pp.17~
- Franz J. Brüggemeier, "Geschichte von unten-Geschichte von innen, In Kontroversen um die Alltagsgeschichte" (1985), Fernuniv. -Gesamthochsch
- Jürgen Kocka, "Sozialgeschichte zwischen Struktur und Erfahrung. Die Herausforderung der Alltagsgeschichte, In idem, Geschichte und Aufklärung", pp.29~44 (1989), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Jürgen Kocka, "Geschichtswissenschaft und Sozialwissenschaft, In Geschichtswissenschaft vor 2000. Perspektiven der Historiographiegeschichte, Geschichtstheorie, Sozial-und Kulturgeschichte. Festschrift für Georg G. Iggers zum 65. Geburtstag" (1991), Margit Rottmann Medienverlag
- Hans U. Wehler, "Neoromantik u. Pseudorealismus in der neuen ‘Alltagsgeschichte’"
- Hans U. Wehler, "Politik in der Geschichte", pp.188~194 (1998), C. H. Beck
- Thomas Nipperdey, "Historismus und Historismuskritik heute", pp.59~
- "Annette Wittkau, Historismus", 15~
- "“Historismus, Historizismus”, Historische Wörterbuch der Philosophie, “Historicism, Historism”, Harry Ritter, Dictionary of Concepts in History", ~
- Gunter Scholtz, "Das Historismusproblem und die Geistenwissenschaften im 20. Jahrhundert, In Historismus am Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts. Eine internationale Diskussion", pp.463~486 (1997), Akademie Verlag
- Otto Gerhard Oexle, "Meineckes Historismus", pp.139~199
- Friedrich Meinecke, "Die Entstehung des Historismus" (1936), Oldenbourg
- Annette Wittkau, "Historismus", 20~22
- Martin Broszat, "Plädoyer für eine Historisierung des Nationalsozialismus, In Der schwierige Umgang mit unserer Geschichte", pp.159~173 (1985), Oldenbourg
- Otto Gerhard Oexle, "Meineckes Historismus", pp.197~199
- Thomas Nipperdey, "Historismus und Historismuskritik heute", pp.63~69
- Lucian hölscher, "Umrisse einer Theorie der Geschichte" (2003), Wallstein
- Lucian hölscher, "The New Annalistic: A sketch of A Theory of History", History & Theory, 36, pp.317~335 (1997)
- Lucian hölscher, "Neue Annalistik", pp.81~
- Lucian Hölscher, "Wie begrenzt ist die Sozialgeschichte, In Was ist Gesellschaftsgeschichte?", pp.312~322 (1991), C. H. Beck
- Reinhart Koselleck, "Wozu noch Historie?, In Über das Studium der Geschichte", pp.347~366 (1990), Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag
- 나인호, "‘역사’의 역사", 역사교육논집, (41), pp.309~335 (2008), 역사교육학회
- Lucian hölscher, "Neue Annalistik", pp.81~85
- Lucian hölscher, "The New Annalistic: A sketch of A Theory of History", pp.333~335
- Reinhart Koselleck, "Zeitschichten", pp.324~ (2000), Suhrkamp