일본의 아시아주의와 조선인의 반응 - 흥아회를 중심으로 -
Pan-Asianism of the Japan and Koreans Reactions -Focusing on the Heungaheu(興亜会)-
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In order to analyze why Chinese and Korean intellectuals gradient in Pan-Asianism is coming back around 1880`s and analysis Studies to be focused on racism. For these studies, Asian extract the identity of each country and to resist the Western Heungaheu is an important research subject. Heungaheu the foundation of Asian solidarity was emphasized geographical accessibility, equality of Confucian culture, politics derived from inbred Castle, the glorious history of the Asian racial, cultural, and historical affinity. Asian solidarity based on these affinities were included strong racist element. In other words, Heungaheu was claiming racial and cultural kindred care based on historical empathy. It emphasis that Korea, China and Japan for a long time kindred, cultural familiarity was the same kind of strong alumni relations. Chosun intellectuals who share a sense of crisis about the West have declined the Heungaheu`s claim. The reason is belongs to a fringe group in Japanese politics Heungaheu also cautious about the progressive theory of weak and race of the principle of Asia is with cultural and historical attraction.
Abstract
In order to analyze why Chinese and Korean intellectuals gradient in Pan-Asianism is coming back around 1880`s and analysis Studies to be focused on racism. For these studies, Asian extract the identity of each country and to resist the Western Heungaheu is an important research subject. Heungaheu the foundation of Asian solidarity was emphasized geographical accessibility, equality of Confucian culture, politics derived from inbred Castle, the glorious history of the Asian racial, cultural, and historical affinity. Asian solidarity based on these affinities were included strong racist element. In other words, Heungaheu was claiming racial and cultural kindred care based on historical empathy. It emphasis that Korea, China and Japan for a long time kindred, cultural familiarity was the same kind of strong alumni relations. Chosun intellectuals who share a sense of crisis about the West have declined the Heungaheu`s claim. The reason is belongs to a fringe group in Japanese politics Heungaheu also cautious about the progressive theory of weak and race of the principle of Asia is with cultural and historical attraction.
참고문헌 (22)
- "漢城旬報漢城周報번역판 한성순보(1884년 7월 3일)", 관훈클럽영신연구기금, ~ (1983)
- "독립신문 논설집" (1970), 송재문화재단
- 黒木杉文, "興亜会報告ㆍ亜細亜協会報告 第1巻" (1993), 不二出版
- 黒木杉文, "興亜会報告ㆍ亜細亜協会報告 第2巻" (1993), 不二出版
- 박노자, "우승 열패의 신화" (2005), 한겨레신문사
- 한상일, "일본지식인과 한국" (2002), 오름
- 전복희, "사회진화론과 국가사상" (1996), 한울
- 竹内好, "日本とアジア" (1993), ちくま書房
- 김영수, "대동아공영권 이념에 대한 비판적 고찰: 다케우치 요시미(竹內好), 마루야마 마사오(丸山眞男)의 비판을 중심으로", 사회과학논총, (17), pp.61~87 (2015), 사회과학연구소
- 김현철, "근대 일본의 ‘아시아’ 주의와 민간단체의 한반도 진출 구상", 한국동양정치사상사연구, 14(1), pp.67~96 (2015), 한국동양정치사상사학회
- 전상숙, "근대적 전환기 일본의 ‘아시아연대론’에 대한 한국의 인지적 대응 : 국권인식을 중심으로", 동아연구, 33(2), pp.7~46 (2014), 동아연구소
- 박상수, "동아시아 근대 ‘아시아主義’ 讀法 - 系譜, 類型, 層位 -", 아세아연구, 56(4), pp.7~38 (2013), 아세아문제연구소
- 이헌주, "1880년대 전반 조선 개화지식인들의 ‘아시아 연대론’인식 연구", 동북아역사논총, (23), pp.307~347 (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 김경일, "문명론과 인종주의, 아시아 연대론- 유길준과 윤치호의 비교를 중심으로", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (78), pp.129~167 (2008), 한국사회사학회
- Sven Saaler, "국제관계의 변용과 내셔널 아이덴티티 형성 － 1880년대~1920년대의 『아시아주의』의 창조 －", 한국문화, (41), pp.135~157 (2008), 규장각한국학연구원
- 김윤희, "러일대립기(1898∼1904) 『皇城新聞』의 이중지향성과 자강론 ―연대와 배제의 접합―", 韓國史學報, (25), pp.327~355 (2006), 고려사학회
- 김현철, "개화기 한국인의 대외 인식과 ‘동양평화’ 구상", 평화연구, 11(1) (2002)
- 김도형, "대한제국기 계몽주의계열 지식층의 ‘삼국제휴론’", 한국근현대사연구, 13 (2000)
- 장인성, "‘인종’과 ‘민족’ 사이 : 동아시아연대론의 지역적 정체성과 ‘인종’", 국제정치논총, 40(4) (2000)
- 함동주, "명치기 일본의 아시아주의와 국권의식", 일본역사연구, 2 (1995)
- 黒木杉文, "興亜会のアジア主義", 法政研究, 71(4) (2005), 九州大学
- 黒木杉文, "興亜会の成立", 政治研究, (30) (1983), 九州大学政治研究会