『通典』「邊防門」東夷篇의 구조 및 찬술 목적
Composition and Editing Purpose of 《Tongdian》〈Part of Frontier Defence〉 Chapter of Dong-yi
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
《Tongdian(通典)》 is a history book written by Duyou during Tang dynasty and the book describes law system from the ancient times to Tianbao(天寶) period. Among nine chapters, the last section <Part of frontier defence> covers four ethnic groups. In this part, it keeps a perception ‘sinocentrism’ rather than an objective approach. It is because that the book was dedicated to supporting Tang’s feudalistic rule. Chapter of Dong-yi(東夷) is included in the volume 185 and 186 of 《Tongdian》 and as other history books in earlier times, the section covers most of east nations. Most importantly, this book has a considerable historic significance in that it is a contemporary account of Three Kingdoms. Based on a strong similarity between preface of <Part of Frontier Defence〉Chapter of Dong-yi and that of 《Houhanshu(後漢書)》, it is observed that Duyou was greatly influenced by Fanye(范曄)’s China-centered mentality. Unlike 《Houhanshu》, Duyou did not distinguish Dong-yi along with the change of the times. It appears that the writer focused on point of compass so Minyue(閩越) is also included in <Part of frontier defence>. Features of this section are summaries, contemporary historic record of Tang dynasty, description with sinocentrism, and exclusion of describing on specific contents. Although it put an importance on friendly relations with China, description of war occupies a relatively small part. The earlier records on Dong-yi were based on indirect information through envoy of diplomacy. However, the writer of 《Tongdian》 directly gathered materials for the book in the field. The historical context distorted the fact in the way that Kimchunchu(金春秋) was the king of the mission to Tang. Moreover, it does not include Balhae and Silla-Tang War on purpose. As chapter of Dong-yi of 《Tongdian》 greatly cover East area during Tang dynasty, it is obvious that it has a considerable importance as a historic record. However, careful attention is required in that the purpose of this section was supporting sinocentrism which leads to a deliberate distortion and exclusion.
Abstract
《Tongdian(通典)》 is a history book written by Duyou during Tang dynasty and the book describes law system from the ancient times to Tianbao(天寶) period. Among nine chapters, the last section <Part of frontier defence> covers four ethnic groups. In this part, it keeps a perception ‘sinocentrism’ rather than an objective approach. It is because that the book was dedicated to supporting Tang’s feudalistic rule. Chapter of Dong-yi(東夷) is included in the volume 185 and 186 of 《Tongdian》 and as other history books in earlier times, the section covers most of east nations. Most importantly, this book has a considerable historic significance in that it is a contemporary account of Three Kingdoms. Based on a strong similarity between preface of <Part of Frontier Defence〉Chapter of Dong-yi and that of 《Houhanshu(後漢書)》, it is observed that Duyou was greatly influenced by Fanye(范曄)’s China-centered mentality. Unlike 《Houhanshu》, Duyou did not distinguish Dong-yi along with the change of the times. It appears that the writer focused on point of compass so Minyue(閩越) is also included in <Part of frontier defence>. Features of this section are summaries, contemporary historic record of Tang dynasty, description with sinocentrism, and exclusion of describing on specific contents. Although it put an importance on friendly relations with China, description of war occupies a relatively small part. The earlier records on Dong-yi were based on indirect information through envoy of diplomacy. However, the writer of 《Tongdian》 directly gathered materials for the book in the field. The historical context distorted the fact in the way that Kimchunchu(金春秋) was the king of the mission to Tang. Moreover, it does not include Balhae and Silla-Tang War on purpose. As chapter of Dong-yi of 《Tongdian》 greatly cover East area during Tang dynasty, it is obvious that it has a considerable importance as a historic record. However, careful attention is required in that the purpose of this section was supporting sinocentrism which leads to a deliberate distortion and exclusion.
참고문헌 (53)
- "通典", ~
- "史記", ~
- "漢書", ~
- "後漢書", ~
- "三國志", ~
- "晋書", ~
- "宋書", ~
- "南齊書", ~
- "梁書", ~
- "魏書", ~
- "周書", ~
- "南史", ~
- "北史", ~
- "隋書", ~
- "舊唐書", ~
- "新唐書", ~
- "冊府元龜", ~
- "唐會要", ~
- "禮記", ~
- "春秋左氏傳", ~
- "孔子家語", ~
- "尙書", ~
- "白虎通義", ~
- "三國史記", ~
- 高國抗, "중국사학사 下" (1998), 풀빛
- 국사편찬위원회, "中國正史 朝鮮傳 譯註 1" (2004), 국사편찬위원회
- 班固, "백호통의" (2005), 소명출판
- 신승하, "중국사학사" (1996), 고려대학교출판부
- 兪尙根, "韓國古代政治史硏究參考文獻解說" (1986), 明知大學校 出版部
- 이계명, "中國史學史綱要" (2003), 전남대학교출판부
- 李宗侗, "중국사학사" (2009), 혜안
- 충청남도역사문화연구원, "百濟史資料譯註集 : 中國篇" (2008), 충청남도역사문화연구원
- 최진열, "발해 국호 연구 : 당조가 인정한 발해의 고구려 계승 묵인과 부인" (2015), 서강대학교출판부
- 한성백제박물관, "백제와 요서지역" (2015), 한성백제박물관
- 趙國璋, "文獻學大辭典" (2005), 廣陵書社
- 강진석, "중화주의의 원형 再構와 당대 이데올로기의 조명", 중국학보, (63), pp.421~453 (2011), 한국중국학회
- 金鍾完, "한중관계 2000년" (2008), 소나무
- 송영대, "6~7세기 신라의 전략‧전술 입안과 활용", 한국사연구, (169), pp.37~73 (2015), 한국사연구회
- 윤용구, "초기 고구려역사 연구" (2008), 동북아역사재단
- 이도학, "『三國史記』의 高句麗 王城 記事 檢證", 한국고대사연구, (79), pp.135~172 (2015), 한국고대사학회
- 李道學, "백제의 요서경략과 중・고등학교 한국사 교과서의 기술", 한국전통문화연구, 15 (2015)
- 李道學, "漢江流域 支配權의 變遷考察" (2015), 삼국한강
- 李成珪, "韓國古代史論叢 1" (1991), 駕洛國史蹟開發硏究院
- 陳光崇, "中國의 歷史認識" (1985), 創作과 批評社
- 정병준, "安東都護府考", 고구려발해연구, 42, pp.279~305 (2012), 고구려발해학회[DOI]
- 李錦繡, "《通典・邊防典》 “吐火羅”條史料來源與《西域圖記》", 西域硏究, (4) (2005)
- 張冠凱, "從《通典》中的賜姓看中原王朝與突厥的關係", 滄桑, (4) (2014)
- 張文儉, "杜佑民族史學研究——以《通典․邊防門》爲中心", 碩士, pp.2010
- 張文儉, "從《通典・邊防》看杜佑民族思想", 唐山師範學院學報, 31(6) (2009)
- 張雲, "《通典・吐蕃傳》的史料價值", 中國邊疆史地研究, (3) (2002)
- 趙楊, "安徽大學", 碩士, pp.2012
- 許佳, "《通典・高句麗》研究", 碩士, pp.2014
- 邢永革, "《唐會要》成書考略", 古籍整理硏究學刊, (4) (2004)
