1925년 예천사건에 나타난 반형평운동의 함의
Anti-Hyeongpyeong-movment Implications's in 1925 Yecheon event
3
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to examine the 1925 Yecheon Incident and its implications. In 1925, in Yecheon, Gyeongsangbuk-do, confrontations arose between peasants and laborers, and equalitarianism movement Baekjeong (butcher)-turned activists. Existing studies explained these confrontations as conflicts between social movement activists, or identified them as based on peasants' and laborers' discrimination sense for people's social status. However, such recognition needs to be newly reviewed because it highlighted only one side of Yecheon Incident. First, the review of subjects in the 1925 Yecheon Incident revealed them as the lower-class people in their early 30s in terms of socio-economic aspects. Also, these people were then so-called proletariat. The 1925 Yecheon Incident was confrontations between the newly named lower-class people and the minority Baekjeong. On the other hand, the reason why they attacked Baekjeong-turned activists was linked to people's relative deprivation sense associated with wealth and poverty along with the long-standing status ideology. Conceptual ideology and specific experience, encountering each other, led to violence. Meanwhile, widely responding to the 1925 Yecheon Incident was then Joseon under the Japanese colonial rule. Government-General of Joseon tried to neutralize the conflicts caused by Yecheon Incident. News media such as the Chosun Ilbo and the Donga Ilbo criticized the peasants and laborers who attacked the equalitarianism activists. On the other hand, socialist movement forces focused on criticizing the powers which instigated the peasants and laborers. Meanwhile, Yecheon Incident made it an accident to newly review the planning for subject formation initiated by socialist movement powers.
Abstract
This study aims to examine the 1925 Yecheon Incident and its implications. In 1925, in Yecheon, Gyeongsangbuk-do, confrontations arose between peasants and laborers, and equalitarianism movement Baekjeong (butcher)-turned activists. Existing studies explained these confrontations as conflicts between social movement activists, or identified them as based on peasants' and laborers' discrimination sense for people's social status. However, such recognition needs to be newly reviewed because it highlighted only one side of Yecheon Incident. First, the review of subjects in the 1925 Yecheon Incident revealed them as the lower-class people in their early 30s in terms of socio-economic aspects. Also, these people were then so-called proletariat. The 1925 Yecheon Incident was confrontations between the newly named lower-class people and the minority Baekjeong. On the other hand, the reason why they attacked Baekjeong-turned activists was linked to people's relative deprivation sense associated with wealth and poverty along with the long-standing status ideology. Conceptual ideology and specific experience, encountering each other, led to violence. Meanwhile, widely responding to the 1925 Yecheon Incident was then Joseon under the Japanese colonial rule. Government-General of Joseon tried to neutralize the conflicts caused by Yecheon Incident. News media such as the Chosun Ilbo and the Donga Ilbo criticized the peasants and laborers who attacked the equalitarianism activists. On the other hand, socialist movement forces focused on criticizing the powers which instigated the peasants and laborers. Meanwhile, Yecheon Incident made it an accident to newly review the planning for subject formation initiated by socialist movement powers.
참고문헌 (43)
- "조선일보", ~
- "동아일보", ~
- "시대일보", ~
- "매일신보", ~
- "개벽", ~
- "신민", ~
- "朝鮮", ~
- 이정 박헌영전집 편집위원회, "이정박헌영전집 1권" (2004), 역사비평사
- 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮農家經濟", ~ (1918)
- 慶尙北道, "慶尙北道統計年報", ~ (1930)
- 醴泉郡, "郡勢一斑", ~ (1937)
- 종로경찰서장, "京鍾警高秘 제9237호의 1 형평사의 中西 등 주의자 초대에 관한 건 in 檢察事務에 關한 記錄 2", 국사편찬위원회 한국사데이터베이스, ~ (1925)
- 종로경찰서장, "京鍾警高秘 제9290호의 1 衡平社總本部 의 動靜에 關한 件 , 禮泉暴動事件에 關하여 in 檢察事務에 關한 記錄 2", 국사편찬위원회 한국사데이터베이스, ~ (1925)
- 종로경찰서장, "京鍾警高秘 제9307호의 1 예천형평사사건 대책집회에 관한 건 in 檢察事務에 關한 記錄 2", 국사편찬위원회 한국사데이터베이스, ~ (1925)
- 종로경찰서장, "京鍾警高秘 제9383호의 1 조선청년총동맹 경고문 발송에 관한 건 in 檢察事務에 關한 記錄 2", 국사편찬위원회 한국사데이터베이스, ~ (1925)
- 部落解放人權硏究, "朝鮮衡平運動史料集" (2016), 解放出版社
- "｢남흥세 외 22명 예심결정서｣ , 1925.11.30. 국가기록원 독립운동관련 판결문", 대구지방법원 안동지청[URL]
- 조지훈, "민족운동사자료 1" (1967)
- 조선총독부 경무국, "治安槪況", ~ (1927)
- 고숙화, "형평운동" (2009), 한국독립운동사편찬위원회
- 김중섭, "형평운동연구-일제침략기 백정의 사회사" (1994), 민영사
- 정연태, "식민권력과 한국 농업" (2014), 서울대학교출판문화원
- 예천군, "예천군지 상권 예천의 역사" (2005)
- 윤수종, "농촌사회제도연구" (2010), 전남대학교출판부
- 이기훈, "청년아 청년아 우리 청년아" (2014), 돌베개
- 이타가키 류타, "한국근대의 역사민족지-경북 상주의 식민지 경험" (2012), 혜안
- 성대경, "한국현대사와 사회주의" (2000), 역사비평사
- 트랜스토리아 편집위원회, "트랜스토리아" (2004), 박종철출판사
- 정병, "식민지 불온열전" (2013), 역사비평사
- 허영란, "일제시기 장시 연구" (2009), 역사비평사
- 아시아민중사연구회, "日韓民衆史 の 最前線" (2016), 有志舎
- 김일수, "일제하 예천형평사 사건과 경북 예천지역의 사회운동", 안동사학, 8 (2003)
- 김일수, "일제강점기 경북 예천지역의 민족운동", 계명사학, 8 (1997)
- 김정인, "1920년대 전반기 천도교단의 노선갈등과 분화", 동학학보, 5 (2003)
- 김재영, "일제 강점기 형평운동의 지역적 전개", 박사, 사학, pp.2007
- 박헌호, "‘계급’ 개념의 근대 지식적 역학－사회주의 연구노트 1", 상허학보, 22, pp.13~39 (2008), 상허학회
- 윤수종, "머슴제도에 관한 일 연구-일제시기 이후 변모과정을 중심으로", 사회와역사, 28 (1991)
- 이준식, "최동희의 민족혁명운동과 코민테른", 역사와현실, 32 (1999)
- 이윤갑, "1920년대의 식민지 상업적 농업의 전개와 지주제 확대", 한국사연구, 90 (1995)
- 장시원, "식민지하 조선의 반봉건적 토지소유에 관한 연구 : 1920-30년대를 중심으로", 경제사학, 4 (1980)
- 조미은, "서울에서의 조선 형평사 활동", 향토서울, 55 (1995)
- 천정환, "근대적 대중지성의 형성과 사회주의 (1)－초기 형평운동과 「낙동강」에 나타난 근대 주체", 상허학보, 22, pp.155~193 (2008), 상허학회
- 한상구, "일제시기 지역주민운동 연구 : 지역 주민대회를 중심으로", 박사, 국사학과, pp.2013