정우회선언의 방법과 내용
Marxist Politics in Colonial Korea: Contents and Method of Chŏnguhoe Manifesto
0
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this article is examining Marxist politics represented in Chŏnguhoe Manifesto in 1926. The focus is directed at the contents and method of ‘politic’ itself what was intended in the Chŏnguhoe Manifesto rather than effectiveness of tactics for a revolution. Chŏnguhoe Manifesto showed how Korean marxists had dealt with ‘politics’ under the rule of Japanese imperialism. They asserted Legitimate Movement, including demand for Home Rule; therefore, the opponents of the manifesto condemned them as a rightist or a home ruler, However, advocates argued that Legitimate Movement was interpreted as active method of a radical political struggle for a communist revolution. Politics of Korean marxist revealed in Chŏnguhoe Menifesto was Legitimate Movement based on mass party which pursued benefits for reality of colonial Korea. This legitimated political movement was justified by authentic dialectical materialism different from non-marxist materialism.
Abstract
The aim of this article is examining Marxist politics represented in Chŏnguhoe Manifesto in 1926. The focus is directed at the contents and method of ‘politic’ itself what was intended in the Chŏnguhoe Manifesto rather than effectiveness of tactics for a revolution. Chŏnguhoe Manifesto showed how Korean marxists had dealt with ‘politics’ under the rule of Japanese imperialism. They asserted Legitimate Movement, including demand for Home Rule; therefore, the opponents of the manifesto condemned them as a rightist or a home ruler, However, advocates argued that Legitimate Movement was interpreted as active method of a radical political struggle for a communist revolution. Politics of Korean marxist revealed in Chŏnguhoe Menifesto was Legitimate Movement based on mass party which pursued benefits for reality of colonial Korea. This legitimated political movement was justified by authentic dialectical materialism different from non-marxist materialism.
참고문헌 (22)
- "東亞日報", ~
- "朝鮮日報", ~
- "開闢", ~
- "理論鬪爭", ~
- "朝鮮之光", ~
- "現代評論", ~
- 이균영, "신간회 연구" (1993), 역사비평사
- 장규식, "일제하 한국 기독교 민족주의 연구" (2001), 혜안
- 전명혁, "1920년대 한국사회주의 운동연구" (2006), 선인
- 김권정, "기독교세력의 신간회 참여와 활동", 한국민족운동사연구, 25 (2000), 한국민족운동사학회
- 김기승, "1920년대 안광천의 방향전환론과 민족해방운동론", 역사와 현실, 6 (1991), 한국역사연구회
- 김석근, "후쿠모토이즘(福本主義)과 식민지하 한국사회주의운동", 아세아연구, 38(2) (1995), 고려대학교 아세아문제연구소
- 김영진, "신간회 경성지회 주도세력과 ʻ비타협ʼ 논쟁", 서울과 역사, (78), pp.175~226 (2011), 서울역사편찬원
- 박종린, "1920년대 ‘통일’ 조선공산당의 결성과정", 한국사연구 (1998), 한국사연구회
- 성주현, "1920년대 천도교의 협동전선론과 신간회 참여와 활동", 동학학보, 9(2), pp.181~227 (2005), 동학학회
- 윤덕영, "신간회 창립과 합법적 정치운동론", 한국민족운동사연구, (65), pp.107~163 (2010), 한국민족운동사학회
- 윤덕영, "신간회 창립 주도세력과 민족주의세력의 정치 지형", 한국민족운동사연구, (68), pp.79~128 (2011), 한국민족운동사학회
- 후지이다케시, "후쿠모토주의의 형성 : 1926년의 좌익 정치운동", 역사연구, (17), pp.155~189 (2007), 역사학연구소
- 임경석, "식민지시대 민족통일전선운동사 연구의 궤적 －이균영의 『신간회 연구』 (역사비평사, 1993)에 대한 비평－", 한국사연구, (149), pp.377~400 (2010), 한국사연구회
- 한상구, "1926~28년 민족주의 세력의 운동론과 신간회", 한국사연구, 86 (1994), 한국사연구회
- 한상구, "1926~28년 사회주의 세력의 운동론과 신간회", 한국사론, 32 (1994), 서울대학교 국사학과
- 후지이다케시, "'코민테른 권위주의’ 성립에 관한 한 시론- 소위 ‘후쿠모토주의’를 둘러싸고", 역사연구, (16), pp.31~55 (2006), 역사학연구소