본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

1927년 조선공산당의 분열과 그 성격

A Study on the Split of the Korean Communist Party in 1927

0

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The purpose of this paper is to identify the background of the split of the Korean Communist Party in 1927 and clarify the nature thereof. The 3rd Congress of the Korean Communist Party was held in two venues. One was held on December 20, 1927, and the other was held on February 27, 1928. One reason for the split was psychological. It was a sense of betrayal that they felt when they learned that certain party personnel secretly made their own inner circle and deceived the others. The anger they felt when they learned that they were deceived was the reason for the split of the party. Yet another reason for the split was a difference in policies. There was controversy surrounding the scope of applying the national united front. The mainstream of the party took a broad attitude. They did not hesitate to partner with pro-Japanese leaders. On the contrary, the non-mainstream group regarded alliance with pro-Japanese leaders as treason that disturbed the national united front movement. The two parties exclusively asserted their legitimacy. However, neither of them was superior in terms of legitimacy. The two parties can be considered to have divided the Korean socialist movement for many years.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify the background of the split of the Korean Communist Party in 1927 and clarify the nature thereof. The 3rd Congress of the Korean Communist Party was held in two venues. One was held on December 20, 1927, and the other was held on February 27, 1928. One reason for the split was psychological. It was a sense of betrayal that they felt when they learned that certain party personnel secretly made their own inner circle and deceived the others. The anger they felt when they learned that they were deceived was the reason for the split of the party. Yet another reason for the split was a difference in policies. There was controversy surrounding the scope of applying the national united front. The mainstream of the party took a broad attitude. They did not hesitate to partner with pro-Japanese leaders. On the contrary, the non-mainstream group regarded alliance with pro-Japanese leaders as treason that disturbed the national united front movement. The two parties exclusively asserted their legitimacy. However, neither of them was superior in terms of legitimacy. The two parties can be considered to have divided the Korean socialist movement for many years.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 서대숙, "한국공산주의운동사 연구" (1985), 화다
  2. 로버트 스칼라피노, "한국공산주의운동사" (2015), 돌베개
  3. 김준엽, "한국공산주의운동사 3" (1986), 청계연구소
  4. 박철규, "1920년대 조선공산당의 조직적 전개와 활동; 제3차 조선공산당을 중심으로", 부대사학, 17 (1993)
  5. 韓東旻, "1920年代 後半 서울系 社會主義者들의 運動論 : ‘新朝鮮共産黨’과 「朝鮮運動」 그룹을 중심으로", 석사, 한국사, pp.1996
  6. 김형국, "신간회 창립 이후 사회주의자들의 민족협동전선론", 한국근현대사연구, 7 (1997)
  7. 박종린, "1920年代 ‘통일’조선공산당의 결성 과정", 한국사연구, 102 (1998)
  8. 전명혁, "'서울파'의 민족통일전선론 연구 - 'ML파'와의 논쟁을 중심으로", 역사연구, (6), pp.92~126 (1998), 역사학연구소
  9. 전명혁, "서울청년회의 분화와 서울파의 형성", 외대사학, 9 (1999)
  10. 전명혁, "1920년대 코민테른의 민족통일전선과 서울파 사회주의 그룹", 韓國史學報, (11), pp.209~227 (2001), 고려사학회
  11. 全明赫, "解光 金思國의 삶과 민족해방운동", 한국근현대사연구, 23 (2002), 한국근현대사학회
  12. 김인덕, "조선공산당재건투쟁협의회 일본출판부의 조직과 활동", 한일민족문제연구, 3 (2002)
  13. 이기훈, "1920년대 사회주의 이념의 전개와 청년 담론", 역사문제연구, 13 (2004)
  14. 최규진, "조선 사회주의자들의 운동 노선과 합법공간 진출(1929~1945년)", 대동문화연구, (56), pp.253~288 (2006), 대동문화연구원
  15. 박종린, "1920년대 사회주의사상의 수용과 일월회", 한국근현대사연구, (40), pp.45~68 (2007), 한국근현대사학회
  16. 홍종욱, "1930년대 『동아일보』의 국제정세 인식1930년대 『동아일보』의 국제정세인식-사회주의 및 전체주의 관련 기사를 중심으로-", 한국민족운동사연구, (58), pp.73~116 (2009), 한국민족운동사학회
  17. 박순섭, "1920∼1930년대 金燦의 사회주의운동과 민족협동전선", 한국근현대사연구, (71), pp.51~85 (2014), 한국근현대사학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)