신라 후비제의 비교사적 고찰 — 正妃의 지위를 중심으로 —
A Comparative Historical Study on the System of queen and concubines in Shilla
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The system of queen and concubines(后妃制) is a hierarchical organization of women in the royal court, focusing on their relationship with the king. “Hoo-bi(后妃)” refers to the king's spouse, “the Queen(王后)” and concubines(後宮). The system of queen and concubines(后妃制) is a hierarchical system between the first Queen(正妃:王后) and concubines(後宮). The core of the system of queen and concubines(后妃制) is the status of the “the Queen(王后)”, who means “the first Queen(正妃)”. Shilla's the system of queen and concubines(后妃制) accepted the system of the Tang Dynasty's system, but was actually reorganized and operated by Shilla's internal circumstances. The Shilla in the Middle-Age period, the title of “Queen” was used to accommodate Tang's system of queen and concubines(后妃制). The title ‘Queen(王后)’ is a title that can only be used by one official spouse of the king. The royal family specialized in the status of using the title of “ the Queen(王后)”, the king's formal spouse. This is an institutionalization of the difference between the status of the royal women and the aristocracy women. It also served as an opportunity for the establishment of a hierarchy within the ruling class. The Shilla's acceptance of the system of queen and concubines(后妃制) was part of the reform through Tang‘s the system of decrees(律令制) and the Ritual System(禮制), and its purpose was to strengthen the royal authority. The royal court clarified its differentiation from other noble families through the title of “Queen” and Confucian rites for royal marriages. The royal family wanted to strengthen the royal authority through the Ritual System(禮制). Shilla's system of queen and concubines(后妃制) is an institutionalization of the hierarchy of royal women and aristocratic women, with the focus on the Queen(王后). In the middle ages of Shilla, the title of “Queen(王后)” was accepted, and the status of “the first Queen(正妃)” was established. It was institutionalized in the last ages of Shilla as “the first queen(王后:正妃)-the other queen(諸妃:夫人)” system. This is the result of the deepening understanding of Tang's system and the establishment of system of queen and concubines(后妃制) in Shilla. In addition, concubines(後宮:妾) are shown in historical records, which were not included in the system of queen and concubines(后妃制). The difference between Queen and concubine is social status. Shilla was a society based on a closed system of social status. Silla's system of queen and concubines(后妃制) was also operated within the system of the Golgum system(骨品制). so only women of the Jingolgwi tribe(眞骨) or higher were organized as the system of queen and concubines(后妃制).
Abstract
The system of queen and concubines(后妃制) is a hierarchical organization of women in the royal court, focusing on their relationship with the king. “Hoo-bi(后妃)” refers to the king's spouse, “the Queen(王后)” and concubines(後宮). The system of queen and concubines(后妃制) is a hierarchical system between the first Queen(正妃:王后) and concubines(後宮). The core of the system of queen and concubines(后妃制) is the status of the “the Queen(王后)”, who means “the first Queen(正妃)”. Shilla's the system of queen and concubines(后妃制) accepted the system of the Tang Dynasty's system, but was actually reorganized and operated by Shilla's internal circumstances. The Shilla in the Middle-Age period, the title of “Queen” was used to accommodate Tang's system of queen and concubines(后妃制). The title ‘Queen(王后)’ is a title that can only be used by one official spouse of the king. The royal family specialized in the status of using the title of “ the Queen(王后)”, the king's formal spouse. This is an institutionalization of the difference between the status of the royal women and the aristocracy women. It also served as an opportunity for the establishment of a hierarchy within the ruling class. The Shilla's acceptance of the system of queen and concubines(后妃制) was part of the reform through Tang‘s the system of decrees(律令制) and the Ritual System(禮制), and its purpose was to strengthen the royal authority. The royal court clarified its differentiation from other noble families through the title of “Queen” and Confucian rites for royal marriages. The royal family wanted to strengthen the royal authority through the Ritual System(禮制). Shilla's system of queen and concubines(后妃制) is an institutionalization of the hierarchy of royal women and aristocratic women, with the focus on the Queen(王后). In the middle ages of Shilla, the title of “Queen(王后)” was accepted, and the status of “the first Queen(正妃)” was established. It was institutionalized in the last ages of Shilla as “the first queen(王后:正妃)-the other queen(諸妃:夫人)” system. This is the result of the deepening understanding of Tang's system and the establishment of system of queen and concubines(后妃制) in Shilla. In addition, concubines(後宮:妾) are shown in historical records, which were not included in the system of queen and concubines(后妃制). The difference between Queen and concubine is social status. Shilla was a society based on a closed system of social status. Silla's system of queen and concubines(后妃制) was also operated within the system of the Golgum system(骨品制). so only women of the Jingolgwi tribe(眞骨) or higher were organized as the system of queen and concubines(后妃制).
참고문헌 (46)
- "三國史記", ~
- "三國遺事", ~
- "高麗史", ~
- "新唐書", ~
- "舊唐書", ~
- "通典", ~
- "唐六典", ~
- "唐會要", ~
- "禮記正義", ~
- "令義解", ~
- 仁井田陞, "唐令拾遺補" (1997), 東京大學出版會
- 靑土關井, "律令" (1976), 岩波書店
- "崔文昌侯全集", 성균관대 대동문화연구원, ~ (1972)
- 김상현, "신라의 사상과 문화" (1999), 一志社
- 김영하, "新羅中代社會硏究" (2007), 일지사
- 김택민, "역주당육전(중)" (2005), 신서원
- 정용숙, "고려시대의 后妃" (1992), 民音社
- 井上秀雄, "新羅史基礎硏究" (1974), 東出版
- 朱子彦, "后宮制度硏究" (1999), 華東師範大學出版社
- 須田春子, "律令制女性史硏究" (1978), 千代田書房
- 豊島悠果, "高麗王朝の儀礼と中國" (2017), 汲古書院
- 金基德, "高麗 封爵制 硏究", 博士, pp.1994
- 김창겸, "신라 憲康王과 義明王后, 그리고 ‘野合’과 孝恭王-특히 신라말 ‘非眞骨王’의 등장과 관련하여-", 신라사학보, (22), pp.215~246 (2011), 신라사학회
- 김창현, "신라왕실과 고려왕실의 칭호", 한국고대사연구, (55), pp.253~307 (2009), 한국고대사학회
- 김호, "唐代 皇室女性의 生活과 地位", 동양사학연구, (97), pp.1~40 (2006), 동양사학회
- 권순형, "고려 內職制의 비교사적 고찰 ―요ㆍ금제와의 관련을 중심으로―", 이화사학연구, (39), pp.161~192 (2009), 이화사학연구소[DOI]
- 文明大, "佛國寺金銅如來坐像二軀와 그 造像讚文(碑銘)의 硏究", 美術資料, 19 (1976)
- 이영호, "통일신라시대의 王과 王妃", 신라사학보, (22), pp.5~60 (2011), 신라사학회
- 이문기, "崔致遠 撰 9세기 후반 佛國寺 關聯資料의 檢討", 신라문화, (26), pp.209~257 (2005), 신라문화연구소
- 李貞蘭, "高麗 后妃의 號稱에 관한 考察", 典農史論, 2 (1996)
- 이정희, "古代 日本의 采女制度", 日本學報, 44 (2000)
- 李炫珠, "新羅 王室女性의 稱號變遷 硏究", 博士, pp.2014
- 이현주, "신라 상고 시기 ‘부인(夫人)’ 칭호의 수용과 의미", 역사와 현실, (86), pp.175~212 (2012), 한국역사연구회
- 이현주, "신라 중고시기 왕실여성의 칭호-<蔚州川前里書石> 銘文을 중심으로-", 신라사학보, (27), pp.83~128 (2013), 신라사학회
- 이현주, "신라 중대 왕후의 책봉과 위상 정립", 역사와 현실, (95), pp.225~267 (2015), 한국역사연구회
- 이현주, "신라 중대 신목왕후(神穆王后)의 혼인과 위상", 여성과 역사, (22), pp.1~28 (2015), 한국여성사학회[DOI]
- 이현주, "신라 중대 효성왕대 혜명왕후와 ‘正妃’의 위상", 한국고대사탐구, (21), pp.239~266 (2015), 한국고대사탐구학회[DOI]
- 이현주, "신라 중대 王母의 칭호와 위상- 혜공왕대 만월태후를 중심으로 -", 한국고대사연구, (85), pp.415~445 (2017), 한국고대사학회[DOI]
- 이현주, "신라 하대초기 왕실여성의 책봉과 의미", 신라사학보, (42), pp.363~399 (2018), 신라사학회
- 이현주, "신라 종묘제의 변천과 태후", 사림, (66), pp.165~190 (2018), 수선사학회[DOI]
- 이현주, "신라 하대초기의 왕위계승과 태후의 역할", 여성과 역사, (29), pp.213~246 (2018), 한국여성사학회[DOI]
- 이현주, "신라 중대 冊封號 授受의 배경과 의미", 신라문화, 55, pp.153~179 (2020), 신라문화연구소[DOI]
- 이현주, "신라 하대 왕위계승권과 왕실여성 - 경문왕가를 중심으로 -", 신라문화, 56, pp.83~111 (2020), 신라문화연구소[DOI]
- 全德在, "新羅六部體制硏究" (1996), 一潮閣
- 崔光植, "三國史記 所載 老嫗의 性格,", 史叢, 25 (1981)
- 도요시마 유카, "고려전기 后妃·女官 제도", 한국중세사연구, (27), pp.197~232 (2009), 한국중세사학회
