한말 여성잡지 『여자지남(女子指南)』의 여성교육론과 여성 ‘국민’ 형성
The Discourse on Women's Education of Yeojajinam and the Formation of Female Nationals in Modern Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the early 20th century, Korean intellectuals and educators tried to acquire the justification for women's education by raising the theory of gender equality and home education. Along with the theory of gender equality and home education, what they tried to support the justification of women's education and set the ultimate educational goal was the formation of a ‘people’, civilization, and the establishment of a modern nation. The logic of forming a ‘national’ through women’s education was roughly divided into two categories. First, it was that women themselves should become part of the ‘people’ on an equal footing with men and fulfill their duties and responsibilities of establishing a modern state, and for this purpose, men and women should receive equal education. The second was that home education was important to make children, especially sons, future ‘nationals’, and that it was important to educate women as mothers who would be in charge of home education. In Yeojajinam, the formation of feminine national based on the theory of gender equality and the ‘national formation theory’ through home education were raised together to persuade the justification of women’s education. Formation of the ‘national’ insisted on by the theory of home education emphasized the role, duty and responsibility of women to form a ‘national’ through ‘motherhood’ rather than women's independence and acquisition of rights and freedoms. On the other hand, the theory of feminine national that men and women should receive equal education and fulfill their duties and responsibilities as equal ‘citizens’ had the potential to develop into a modern women's liberation movement and feminist movement by emphasizing women's independence, rights and freedom. However, there was no discussion about the social and political rights or freedoms that women can enjoy as ‘citizens’ even in the claim that men and women are equal ‘citizens’. Some female intellectuals and educators made it the goal of women's education to free themselves from men's oppression and restraint, to develop self-reliance, to acquire freedom and rights, and to become ‘citizens’ on an equal footing with men. However, in the crisis of loss of national sovereignty, women as ‘nationals’ were only required to have the duty and responsibility to achieve national civilization and prosperity and establish a modern state.
Abstract
In the early 20th century, Korean intellectuals and educators tried to acquire the justification for women's education by raising the theory of gender equality and home education. Along with the theory of gender equality and home education, what they tried to support the justification of women's education and set the ultimate educational goal was the formation of a ‘people’, civilization, and the establishment of a modern nation. The logic of forming a ‘national’ through women’s education was roughly divided into two categories. First, it was that women themselves should become part of the ‘people’ on an equal footing with men and fulfill their duties and responsibilities of establishing a modern state, and for this purpose, men and women should receive equal education. The second was that home education was important to make children, especially sons, future ‘nationals’, and that it was important to educate women as mothers who would be in charge of home education. In Yeojajinam, the formation of feminine national based on the theory of gender equality and the ‘national formation theory’ through home education were raised together to persuade the justification of women’s education. Formation of the ‘national’ insisted on by the theory of home education emphasized the role, duty and responsibility of women to form a ‘national’ through ‘motherhood’ rather than women's independence and acquisition of rights and freedoms. On the other hand, the theory of feminine national that men and women should receive equal education and fulfill their duties and responsibilities as equal ‘citizens’ had the potential to develop into a modern women's liberation movement and feminist movement by emphasizing women's independence, rights and freedom. However, there was no discussion about the social and political rights or freedoms that women can enjoy as ‘citizens’ even in the claim that men and women are equal ‘citizens’. Some female intellectuals and educators made it the goal of women's education to free themselves from men's oppression and restraint, to develop self-reliance, to acquire freedom and rights, and to become ‘citizens’ on an equal footing with men. However, in the crisis of loss of national sovereignty, women as ‘nationals’ were only required to have the duty and responsibility to achieve national civilization and prosperity and establish a modern state.
참고문헌 (24)
- "『여자지남", ~
- "가정잡지", ~
- "자선부인회잡지", ~
- "대한자강회월보", ~
- "대한매일신보", ~
- "황성신문", ~
- 홍인숙, "근대 계몽기 여성담론" (2009), 혜안
- 韓韡, "清末における下田歌子著『新選家政学』の翻訳・出版について", 言葉と文化, 15 (2014)
- 김복순, "근대초기 모성담론의 형성과 젠더화 전략", 한국고전여성문학연구, 0(14), pp.5~51 (2007), 한국고전여성문학회[DOI]
- 김성은, "한말 한국지식인과 양계초의 여성교육론 비교", 여성과 역사, (21), pp.121~148 (2014), 한국여성사학회[DOI]
- 김소영, "서양인 선교사들의 한국 여성 인식과 여성론 -The Korean Repository와 The Korea Review기사를 중심으로-", 민족문화논총, (77), pp.95~133 (2021), 민족문화연구소
- 김소영, "근대 한국의 여성 공론장 형성과 여자지남(녀ᄌᆞ지남) 발행", 전북사학, (62), pp.48~88 (2021), 전북사학회
- 김영민, "한국 근대 초기 여성담론의 생성과 변모(2) - 근대 초기 잡지를 중심으로", 현대문학의 연구, (60), pp.129~173 (2016), 한국문학연구학회[DOI]
- 김영민, "한국 근대 초기 여성담론의 생성과 변모 - 근대 초기 신문을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, (95), pp.223~260 (2016), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
- 박연호, "선교사들의 교육 사업 계획과 실천, 1884~1906", 교육사학연구, 21(1), pp.65~96 (2011), 교육사학회[DOI]
- 朴容玉, "韓國 近代女性運動史 硏究 : 1880년대후기~1920년대초를 중심으로", 박사, 사학, pp.1983
- 안예리, "20세기 전반기 가정학 교과서의 번역과 어휘", 한국사전학, (31), pp.85~116 (2018), 한국사전학회[DOI]
- 이숙인, "조선후기 가정론(家政論)의 성격: 양생(養生)과 치산(治産)", 한국사상사학, (45), pp.407~440 (2013), 한국사상사학회
- 이장우, "대한제국기 『가정잡지』에 대한 일고찰-애국계몽운동의 일단면", 서지학연구, 4 (1989)
- 이혜진, "한국 근대 초기 여성잡지 연구", 박사, pp.2019
- 임영빈, "개화기 여성공론장의 형성과 발전", 현상과 인식, 43(3), pp.127~152 (2019), 한국인문사회과학회[DOI]
- 장기영, "1900년대 여성 필자들의 공적 글쓰기 양상 - 『자선부인회잡지』를 중심으로", 한국문예비평연구, (62), pp.181~210 (2019), 한국현대문예비평학회[DOI]
- 전미경, "개화기 ‘남녀동등’ 담론에 나타난 여성에 대한 계몽의 시각", 가정과삶의질연구, 20(1), pp.87~101 (2002), 가정과삶의질학회
- 丁暻淑, "大韓帝國末期 女性運動의 性格 硏究", 박사, 사학, pp.1989
