조선인의 조선 연구 ― 코민테른의 1922년 12월 결정서 채택에 참여한 조선인들을 중심으로―
Korean Studies by the Koreans : Focused on the Koreans Participated in the Adoption of the Comintern Resolution of December 1922
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article aims to identify how Korean socialists' opinions were reflected in The December Decision (1922) of Comintern. Korean socialists had mixed opinions. They were separated into the remaining group of The Verkhneudinsk Convention and the group departing therefrom. Comintern officials responsible for Korean problems were likewise separated into the group supporting the remaining Korean group and the group supporting the departed group. The former's key member was Comintern's general secretary O. Kuusinen, and the latter's key member was Comintern's Far East Asia Division director G.Voitinsky. Comintern's internal opinions managed to narrowed their gap. The corresponding December Decision brought confusion to Korean revolution. First, Korean Bureau status was vaguely defined. Regarded as its higher institute was Comintern's presidium or Comintern's Far East Division. Second, policy for Koreans' national unification front was inconsistent. Meanwhile, the decision evaluated the leaders of nationalism as compromising with the colonial rule's power. The communist party was authorized to join nationalists-led cultural movement. Third, leadership problems of Korean society in Russisan territory brought confusion to the campaign. The decision described Korean Bureau as if it conducted administrative affairs for Korean society in Russia, later fanning friction between Comintern's Korean Bureau and the Korean department of Russian Communist party in Maritime Province.
Abstract
This article aims to identify how Korean socialists' opinions were reflected in The December Decision (1922) of Comintern. Korean socialists had mixed opinions. They were separated into the remaining group of The Verkhneudinsk Convention and the group departing therefrom. Comintern officials responsible for Korean problems were likewise separated into the group supporting the remaining Korean group and the group supporting the departed group. The former's key member was Comintern's general secretary O. Kuusinen, and the latter's key member was Comintern's Far East Asia Division director G.Voitinsky. Comintern's internal opinions managed to narrowed their gap. The corresponding December Decision brought confusion to Korean revolution. First, Korean Bureau status was vaguely defined. Regarded as its higher institute was Comintern's presidium or Comintern's Far East Division. Second, policy for Koreans' national unification front was inconsistent. Meanwhile, the decision evaluated the leaders of nationalism as compromising with the colonial rule's power. The communist party was authorized to join nationalists-led cultural movement. Third, leadership problems of Korean society in Russisan territory brought confusion to the campaign. The decision described Korean Bureau as if it conducted administrative affairs for Korean society in Russia, later fanning friction between Comintern's Korean Bureau and the Korean department of Russian Communist party in Maritime Province.
참고문헌 (24)
- "Телеграмма из представителей Ирукутской группы Ханменще Намманчун Сеулов, представителей Ирукутской группы Корей Кимчзявон Токоден Тенденгван", 이르쿠츠크파 대표 한명세, 남만춘, 세울로프와 조선 내지 이르쿠츠크파 대표 김재봉, 독고전, 전정관 등의 전보, ~ (1922)
- "Журнал объединенного съезда Коркоморганизаций г.Чита(치타 시에서 열린고려공산당 통합대회 문건", с.6, РГАСПИ ф.495 оп.135 д.64 л.8-13, ~
- "Краткая сводка работы ‘объединенного съезда Корейскойкоммунистической партии’ с 19 октября по 28 октября 1922 годав г.В-Удинске", с.1, РГАСПИ ф.495 оп.135 д.63 л.19-20об, ~ (1922)
- 남만춘, "국제당 극동부장 보이틴스키 동무 앞", с.4, РГАСПИ ф.495 оп.135 д.63 л.26-27об, ~ (1922)
- "Мандат, перевод с корейского", с.1, РГАСПИ ф.495 оп.135 д.63 л.37об, ~ (1922)
- 이동휘, "국제당집행위 총비서 쿠시넨 앞 전보", РГАСПИ ф.495 оп.154 д.139, ~ (1922)
- "Протокол объединительного съезда коммунистической партии Кореи", с.32, РГАСПИ ф.495 оп.135 д.63 л.2-18об, ~
- 고려공산당 통합대회에 관한 개괄 보고, "이동휘", ~ (1922)
- 이동휘, "국제당집행위 조선문제위원회 앞, 사본을 러시아당중앙에게", ~ (1922)
- "Члену ЦКРКП тов.Зиновьеву(러시아당 중앙위원 지노비에프 동무에게)", с.2, РГАСПИ ф.495 оп.135 д.56 л.23об, ~
- 쿠시넨, "Телеграмма: Чита Дальбюро ЦКРКП(치따, 러시아공산당 극동국 앞 전보)", с.1, РГАСПИ ф.495 оп.154 д.206 л.1, ~ (1922)
- 국제당제4차대회 조선문제위원회, "Резолюция по Корейскому вопросу(조선문제에 관한 결정)", с.1, РГАСПИ ф.495 оп.45 д.3 л.12-19, ~
- 김준엽, "한국공산주의운동사(1)" (1967), 고려대학교아세아문제연구소
- DAE-SOOK SUH, "한국공산주의 운동사 연구 서울" (1985), 화다
- 전명혁, "1920년대 한국사회주의운동연구" (2006), 선인
- R.V.Daniels, "ロシア共産黨黨內鬪爭史" (1982), 現代思潮社
- 村田陽一, "コミンテルン資料集 第2卷" (1978), 大月書店
- Г.М.Адибеков, "Организационная структураКоминтерна(코민테른의 조직 구조) 1919～1943" (1997), РОССПЭН
- 水野直樹, "식민지시대 한국 사회와 운동" (1985), 사계절출판사
- 강호출, "재노령 고려공산당창립대표회준비위원회(오르그뷰로)연구", 역사와현실, 28 (1998)
- 전명혁, "자료소개 : 조선 문제에 대한 코민테른집행위원회 산하 원동부의 결정", 사림, 19 (2003)
- 임경석, "근대전환기 동아시아 속의 한국" (2004), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 임경석, "1922년 베르흐네우딘스크 대회의 결렬", 韓國史學報, (27), pp.107~143 (2007), 고려사학회
- 林京錫, "코민테른의 1922년 4월 22일자 한국문제결정서 연구", 대동문화연구, (62), pp.391~421 (2008), 대동문화연구원