본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

미국의 동백림사건 중재와 ‘반공의 연대’

The American Mediation to East-Berlin Incident and ‘Solidarity of Anti-Communism’

이정민
수선사학회|2020.04|사림 (SARIM, The Historical Journal)|제72호|pp. 291-316

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

anti-communism반공주의서독동백림사건West GermanyEast-Berlin Incident국무부동베를린East-BerlinUS Department of State
주제분류역사학

초록

When the diplomatic conflict between South Korean and West German government began, American government tried to lean out the situation. They believed that this conflict is just a trouble between S. Korea and W. Germany, so it would be solved when the countries involved directly meet and negotiate. In the American ‘non-intervention principle’ also included an expression of complaint that Park Chunghee Regime arbitrarily dispatched KCIA agents to Europe and America and ‘kidnapped’ Koreans without preliminary notice or request for cooperation to W. German or American government. When the diplomatic conflict between South Korea and West Germany continued for long and became increasingly intense, American government consistently met the diplomats of S. Korea and W. Germany. The American ostensible principle was still ‘non-intervention’, and they led S. Korean and W. German government to resolve the conflict on their own. Nevertheless the conflict became worse after appellate trial on December 1968, and a sense of crisis was spreading that the diplomatic relations between S. Korea and W. Germany could be break off. Then American government actively intervened the situation and draw the resolution. Because of American mediation, the diplomatic conflict between S. Korean and W. German government got solved. When intervening the diplomatic conflict due to East-Berlin Incident, American government did not concern about the truth or human rights. They only focused on the recovery and maintenance of friendly relations between S. Korea and W. Germany. It meant to keep the ‘Solidarity of Anti-Communism’ firm and undamaged in the International Cold War System.

Abstract

When the diplomatic conflict between South Korean and West German government began, American government tried to lean out the situation. They believed that this conflict is just a trouble between S. Korea and W. Germany, so it would be solved when the countries involved directly meet and negotiate. In the American ‘non-intervention principle’ also included an expression of complaint that Park Chunghee Regime arbitrarily dispatched KCIA agents to Europe and America and ‘kidnapped’ Koreans without preliminary notice or request for cooperation to W. German or American government. When the diplomatic conflict between South Korea and West Germany continued for long and became increasingly intense, American government consistently met the diplomats of S. Korea and W. Germany. The American ostensible principle was still ‘non-intervention’, and they led S. Korean and W. German government to resolve the conflict on their own. Nevertheless the conflict became worse after appellate trial on December 1968, and a sense of crisis was spreading that the diplomatic relations between S. Korea and W. Germany could be break off. Then American government actively intervened the situation and draw the resolution. Because of American mediation, the diplomatic conflict between S. Korean and W. German government got solved. When intervening the diplomatic conflict due to East-Berlin Incident, American government did not concern about the truth or human rights. They only focused on the recovery and maintenance of friendly relations between S. Korea and W. Germany. It meant to keep the ‘Solidarity of Anti-Communism’ firm and undamaged in the International Cold War System.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. "RG 59, Entry 1613-C, Box 363 (Stack 150, Row 64, Compartment 8, Shelf 3), CENTRAL FOREIGN POLICY FILES 1967-1969 :Culture and Information, EDX 10 FR-KOR S", 미국 국립문서기록관리청(NARA) 소장, ~
  2. "RG 59, Entry 1613-C, Box 386 (Stack 150, Row 64, Compartment 8, Shelf 7), CENTRAL FOREIGN POLICY FILES 1967-1969 :Culture and Information, PPB 9-7 GER W-KOR S", 미국 국립문서기록관리청(NARA) 소장., ~
  3. "RG 59, Entry 1613-C, Box 1508 (Stack 150, Row 65, Compartment 31, Shelf 6), CENTRAL FOREIGN POLICY FILES 1967-1969:Political and Defense, CSM 6 KOR S", 미국 국립문서기록관리청(NARA) 소장, ~
  4. "RG 59, Entry 1613-C, Box 2280 (Stack 150, Row 65, Compartment 12, Shelf 4), CENTRAL FOREIGN POLICY FILES 1967-1969:Political and Defense, POL 23-4 KOR S", 미국 국립문서기록관리청(NARA) 소장, ~
  5. "RG 59, Entry 1613-C, Box 2281 (Stack 150, Row 65, Compartment 12, Shelf 4), CENTRAL FOREIGN POLICY FILES 1967-1969:Political and Defense, POL 29 KOR S", 미국 국립문서기록관리청(NARA) 소장, ~
  6. "IB5 82.70 92.23, Bestand 37 Bd. 45 479, Verschleppte Koreaner(납치된남한국적자들)", 독일 연방외무부 정치문서보관소(PAAA) 소장, ~
  7. "IB5 82.70 92.23, Bestand 37 Bd. 58 345, Verschleppte Koreaner. Verschwinden südkorean. Staatsangehöriger(납치된 남한인들. 남한국적자들의 실종)", 독일 연방외무부 정치문서보관소(PAAA) 소장, ~
  8. "독일 연방외무부 정치문서보관소(PAAA) 소장"
  9. "V4 88 5777", 67, Bestand 83 Bd. 948 Bd. 1, Entführung von Südkoreanern aus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland(독일연방공화국에서의 남한 국적인들의 납치사건)
  10. "V4 88", 5777, 독일 연방외무부 정치문서보관소(PAAA) 소장, ~
  11. "V4 88 5777", 67, Bestand 83 Bd. 949 Bd. III, Entführung von Südkoreanern aus der BRD(독일연방공화국에서의 남한 국적인들의납치사건)
  12. "V4 88 5777", 67, Bestand 83 Bd. 949 Bd. IV, Entführung von Südkoreanern aus der Bundesrepublik(독일연방공화국에서의 남한국적인들의 납치사건)
  13. "V4 88 5777", 67, Bestand 83 Bd. 950 Bd. V, Entführung von Südkoreanern aus der Bundesrepublik(독일연방공화국에서의 남한 국적인들의 납치사건)
  14. "V4 88 5777", 77, Bestand 83 Bd. 951 Bd. IX, Entführung von Südkoreanern aus der Bundesrepublik(독일연방공화국에서의 남한국적인들의 납치사건: 개별적 사안들)
  15. "V4 88 5777", 67, Bestand 83 Bd. 952 Bd. X, Entführung von Südkoreanern aus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland(독일연방공화국에서의 남한 국적인들의 납치)
  16. "V4 88 5777", 67, Bestand 83 Bd. 952 Bd. XI, Entführung von Südkoreanern aus der Bundesrepublik(독일연방공화국에서의 남한국적인들의 납치)
  17. "V4 88 5777", 67, Bestand 83 Bd. 953 Bd. XIII, Entführung von Südkoreanern aus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland(독일연방공화국에서의 남한 국적인들의 납치)
  18. "V.1 훈령 및 보고-독일 관련자, 1967, “동백림사건, 1967~1971”", 대한민국외교부 소장, ~ (1967)
  19. "V.8 국내조치, 1967~1969, “동백림사건, 1967~1971”", 대한민국 외교부 소장, ~ (1969)
  20. "V.11 친서, 1967~1969, “동백림사건, 1967~1971”", 대한민국 외교부 소장, ~ (1969)
  21. "V.12 독일 특사방한, 1969.1.13~18, “동백림사건, 1967~1971”", 대한민국 외교부 소장., ~ (1969)
  22. "東亞日報", ~
  23. "朝鮮日報", ~
  24. 홍석률, "분단의 히스테리-공개문서로 보는 미중관계와 한반도-" (2012), 창비
  25. 김명섭, "1967년 "동백림사건" 이후 한독관계의 긴장과 회복: 비밀해제된 한국외교문서를 중심으로", 한국정치외교사논총, 35(1), pp.5~39 (2013), 한국정치외교사학회[DOI]
  26. 양준석, "동백림 사건의 국제정치사", 석사, 정치학, pp.2009
  27. 이정민, "한독 경제협력과 동백림 사건", 역사비평, (119), pp.160~184 (2017), 역사문제연구소[DOI]
  28. 이정민, "프랑크 서독특사 방한(訪韓)과 동백림사건 ‘해결’", 사림, (59), pp.227~254 (2017), 수선사학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

언론보도를 통해 본 남한과 서독의 동백림사건 인식이정민수선사학회 · 사림2019 · 제69호동백림사건을 둘러싼 남한정부와 서독정부의 초기 외교갈등이정민수선사학회 · 사림2014 · 제50호탄원서에 나타난 서독인들의 동백림사건 인식이정민수선사학회 · 사림2016 · 제55호프랑크 서독특사 방한(訪韓)과 동백림사건 ‘해결’이정민수선사학회 · 사림2017 · 제59호1967년 "동백림사건" 이후 한독관계의 긴장과 회복: 비밀해제된 한국외교문서를 중심으로김명섭, 양준석한국정치외교사학회 · 한국정치외교사논총2013 · 제35권 제1호서독 대학생들의 주독(駐獨) 남한대사관 난입사건과 68혁명 — 상호규정성의 공시성과 비동시성 —이정민수선사학회 · 사림2018 · 제64호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

갑오개혁 이전 조선정부의 검역규칙 제정과 개정문제의 대두— 「朝鮮通商口防備瘟疫暫設章程」을 중심으로 —박한민pp. 1-40일제강점초기(1910~1915) 총독부재판소의 의병판결과 그 성격김항기pp. 41-68조선총독부 고등법원의 토지소유권 판결(1918～1921)과 그 성격남기현pp. 69-96高麗 明宗 후반기 무신집권자의 부재와 권력분점백인환pp. 97-133태종대 慶源府 移設･德安陵 遷葬의 의미와 東北面 변화지요환pp. 135-164
원문 보기