18세기 후반 淸風金氏 仁伯系의 반척신 정치— 김치인ㆍ김종수를 중심으로 —
The Anti-Relative Politics of the Cheongpung Kim Clan In-Baek Line in the 18th Century
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study seeks to understand the purpose and function of anti-relative politics engaged in mainly by the family of In-Baek line located in Cheongpung the political circumstances that prevailed during the Yeongjo(英祖) and Jeongjo(正祖) eras. According to existing studies, politics in those days was mostly about the political power of ‘kings’. This paper places particular attention on the Kim clan from Cheongpung, which exercised great influence under the kings Yeongjo and Jeongjo, in order to study the above-mentioned roles of bureaucrats. Influential clans of ‘Noron(老論),’ during the period were closely connected through school and marriage ties as well as having shared political interests. In-Baek line in Cheongpung, in particular, became the center of Noron power through the mediating effects of anti-relative politics. Such political power began to exert influence among the ‘Sinimoksa(辛壬獄事)’ and emerged as a political force after the ‘Cheongmyeongdang Incident(淸明黨事件)’. As shown in relation to the production of 「Myeonguirok(明義錄)」, those families occupied an important political position during the Jeongjo era. Under this policy during the reign of Yeongjo, the political situation became very unstable and a Tangpyeong group and an anti-Tangpyeong group formed. Moreover, the families of Hong in Pungsan and Kim in Gyeongju formed an alliance during the late Yeongjo era, so the political situations were expanded to relative power and anti-relative power in addition to the Tangpyeong group and anti-Tangpyeong group landscape. After Jeongjo became king, the political landscape began to change and political realignments took place. Jeongjo tried to curtail the power of allied families and, accordingly, the forces opposed to the power of allied families, including Kim Jong-su(金鍾秀) and Seo Myeong-seon(徐命善), reorganized themselves. They checked the Namin(南人) group of Chae Je-gong(蔡濟恭), which had positioned itself to be close to Jeongjo, to promote a more balanced political landscape. Political forces during the period maintained political balance in the context of ‘Jullontangpyeong(峻論蕩平)’ Those opposed to the power of allied families centered round Kim Jong-su in Cheongpung checked the power of allied families and Namin at the same time and spoke in unison about important political matters, thus forming an axis of political power. In the politics of the 18th century, the In-Baek line in Cheongpung administered affairs of the state from a position of Noron Cheongnyu(淸流). Noron Cheongnyu checked the power of allied families and stressed ‘loyalty.’ Even before his death, Kim Jong-su memorialized the king as Bongjoha to uphold the principle of loyalty asserted in 「Myeonguirok」.
Abstract
This study seeks to understand the purpose and function of anti-relative politics engaged in mainly by the family of In-Baek line located in Cheongpung the political circumstances that prevailed during the Yeongjo(英祖) and Jeongjo(正祖) eras. According to existing studies, politics in those days was mostly about the political power of ‘kings’. This paper places particular attention on the Kim clan from Cheongpung, which exercised great influence under the kings Yeongjo and Jeongjo, in order to study the above-mentioned roles of bureaucrats. Influential clans of ‘Noron(老論),’ during the period were closely connected through school and marriage ties as well as having shared political interests. In-Baek line in Cheongpung, in particular, became the center of Noron power through the mediating effects of anti-relative politics. Such political power began to exert influence among the ‘Sinimoksa(辛壬獄事)’ and emerged as a political force after the ‘Cheongmyeongdang Incident(淸明黨事件)’. As shown in relation to the production of 「Myeonguirok(明義錄)」, those families occupied an important political position during the Jeongjo era. Under this policy during the reign of Yeongjo, the political situation became very unstable and a Tangpyeong group and an anti-Tangpyeong group formed. Moreover, the families of Hong in Pungsan and Kim in Gyeongju formed an alliance during the late Yeongjo era, so the political situations were expanded to relative power and anti-relative power in addition to the Tangpyeong group and anti-Tangpyeong group landscape. After Jeongjo became king, the political landscape began to change and political realignments took place. Jeongjo tried to curtail the power of allied families and, accordingly, the forces opposed to the power of allied families, including Kim Jong-su(金鍾秀) and Seo Myeong-seon(徐命善), reorganized themselves. They checked the Namin(南人) group of Chae Je-gong(蔡濟恭), which had positioned itself to be close to Jeongjo, to promote a more balanced political landscape. Political forces during the period maintained political balance in the context of ‘Jullontangpyeong(峻論蕩平)’ Those opposed to the power of allied families centered round Kim Jong-su in Cheongpung checked the power of allied families and Namin at the same time and spoke in unison about important political matters, thus forming an axis of political power. In the politics of the 18th century, the In-Baek line in Cheongpung administered affairs of the state from a position of Noron Cheongnyu(淸流). Noron Cheongnyu checked the power of allied families and stressed ‘loyalty.’ Even before his death, Kim Jong-su memorialized the king as Bongjoha to uphold the principle of loyalty asserted in 「Myeonguirok」.
참고문헌 (23)
- "英祖實錄", 국사편찬위원회 DB, ~
- "正祖實錄", 한국고전종합 DB, ~
- "明義錄", ~
- "夢梧集", ~
- "恩波散稿", ~
- "定辨錄", ~
- "弘濟全書", ~
- 김성윤, "朝鮮後期 蕩平政治 硏究" (1997), 지식산업사
- 유봉학, "개혁과 갈등의 시대-정조와 19세기" (2009), 신구문화사
- 이근호, "조선후기 탕평파와 국정운영", ~ (2016)
- 성균관대학교 동아시아학술원, "정조어찰첩 下" (2009), 성균관대학교출판부
- 박광용, "영조와 정조의 나라" (1998), 푸른역사
- 정만조, "영조의 국가정책과 정치이념" (2012), 한국학중앙연구원
- 최성환, "영・정조대 탕평정치와 군신의리" (2020), 신구문화사
- 김정자, "英祖末~正祖 初의 政局과 政治勢力의 動向", 조선시대사학보, 44 (2008)
- 김정자, "정조 후반 순조 초반 정치세력과 정국의 동향-정조 16년(1792)~순조 6년(1806)을 중심으로-", 한국학논총, 50 (2018)
- 김백철, "영조 만년의 초월적 권위와 ‘大蕩平’", 역사학보, 214 (2012)
- 정만조, "英祖代 中半의 政局과 蕩平策의 再定立-少論蕩平에서 老論蕩平으로의 轉換", 歷史學報, 111 (1986)
- 정만조, "英祖代 初半의 蕩平策과 蕩平派의 活動", 진단학보, 56 (1983)
- 조준호, "朝鮮 肅宗~英祖代 近畿地域 老論學脈 硏究", 박사, pp.2004
- 최성환, "정조대 탕평정국의 군신의리 연구", 박사, 국사학, pp.2009
- 허태용, ""景宗實錄"을 통해서 본 少論의 정치 義理 검토", 민족문화연구, 60 (2013)
- 허태용, "1728년 戊申亂의 진압과"戡亂錄"의 편찬", 한국사연구, 166 (2014)
