본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선총독부 학무국장 이진호(李軫鎬)의 역할과 의미(1924~1929)

The Role and Meaning of Lee Jin-ho(李軫鎬), Director-General of the academic affairs bureau of the Japanese Government-General of Korea(1924~1929)

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

In December 1924, Lee Jin-ho was selected as the director of the academic affairs bureau of the Japanese Government-General of Korea. Since he was the first Korean to be a director-general level official of the Government-General of Korea, the Korean society was greatly welcomed, and it was expected that he would solve pending issues related to the education of Koreans at the time, such as compulsory primary education, the establishment of a civil university, and the problem of teaching the Korean language. However, he drew a line on these issues as a bureaucrat of the Government-General of Korea. When the June 10th Movement broke out in 1926, he was criticized by the Korean community for taking more unauthorized and ruthless measures than the judicial authorities in the process of punishing Korean students. Amid mounting criticism of the Crane Bureau, Lee Jin-ho sought to reform the atmosphere. He has maintained his own power in a way that 'supports and actively cooperates with Japanese imperialism' against the colonial power that requires cooperative forces. However, Lee Jin-ho's cooperation was meaningful when it was achieved in a certain combination with Joseon society. In other words, Lee Jin-ho needed to show his value to the colonial power by continuously gaining certain support from Joseon society. In this context, he was actively involved in the fierce alliance of the Gyeongseong Law Code, but the voices of criticism against Lee Jin-ho grew only in both the Government-General and the Koreans. Meanwhile, the governor-general was replaced by Yamanashi Hanjo from Makoto Saito. While seeking to change the situation, he actively suggested the theory of 'one-sided one-way one-way one-way one-way one', and it seems that Yamanashi, who had been appointed with the idea of extensionism, adopted it as a means of surprise. The Government-General, the Japanese media, and political circles opposed the idea of one-sided one-way one-way one-way one, and Lee Jin-ho, in particular, lacked the momentum to break through it. As a result, this policy was developed in an increasingly rapid and unreasonable way, eventually putting the Koreans under even greater pressure. Lee Jin-ho's justification was that he led the Koreans to civilization and formed a united people, but the process in which the burden on the Joseon Dynasty was more heavy showed himself that his ideas and logic were contradictory. As a result, even the Koreans criticized the one-sided one-way one-way one and demanded correction. Meanwhile, in January 1929, Lee Jin-ho was suddenly discharged after being accused of bribery. It was a futile and disgraceful resignation. Due to Lee Jin-ho's indecision, Yamanashi initially wanted to be dismissed from the position of director of the Academic Affairs Bureau, which planned to establish a position called 'participating officer' to replace the director-general position and implement it in a way that Lee Jin-ho was appointed as a honorable predecessor. However, when this incident broke out, the position of director-general of the Korean people naturally disappeared by leaving the office without any countermeasures. There was a widespread perception in the world that a Korean would be appointed as Lee Jin-ho's successor, but no personnel appointment of the Korean director-general was made. The replacement of the participant officer, which was likely to be achieved if it were not for the bribery suspicion, also fizzled out, and after a long stay, it was eventually destroyed.

Abstract

In December 1924, Lee Jin-ho was selected as the director of the academic affairs bureau of the Japanese Government-General of Korea. Since he was the first Korean to be a director-general level official of the Government-General of Korea, the Korean society was greatly welcomed, and it was expected that he would solve pending issues related to the education of Koreans at the time, such as compulsory primary education, the establishment of a civil university, and the problem of teaching the Korean language. However, he drew a line on these issues as a bureaucrat of the Government-General of Korea. When the June 10th Movement broke out in 1926, he was criticized by the Korean community for taking more unauthorized and ruthless measures than the judicial authorities in the process of punishing Korean students. Amid mounting criticism of the Crane Bureau, Lee Jin-ho sought to reform the atmosphere. He has maintained his own power in a way that 'supports and actively cooperates with Japanese imperialism' against the colonial power that requires cooperative forces. However, Lee Jin-ho's cooperation was meaningful when it was achieved in a certain combination with Joseon society. In other words, Lee Jin-ho needed to show his value to the colonial power by continuously gaining certain support from Joseon society. In this context, he was actively involved in the fierce alliance of the Gyeongseong Law Code, but the voices of criticism against Lee Jin-ho grew only in both the Government-General and the Koreans. Meanwhile, the governor-general was replaced by Yamanashi Hanjo from Makoto Saito. While seeking to change the situation, he actively suggested the theory of 'one-sided one-way one-way one-way one-way one', and it seems that Yamanashi, who had been appointed with the idea of extensionism, adopted it as a means of surprise. The Government-General, the Japanese media, and political circles opposed the idea of one-sided one-way one-way one-way one, and Lee Jin-ho, in particular, lacked the momentum to break through it. As a result, this policy was developed in an increasingly rapid and unreasonable way, eventually putting the Koreans under even greater pressure. Lee Jin-ho's justification was that he led the Koreans to civilization and formed a united people, but the process in which the burden on the Joseon Dynasty was more heavy showed himself that his ideas and logic were contradictory. As a result, even the Koreans criticized the one-sided one-way one-way one and demanded correction. Meanwhile, in January 1929, Lee Jin-ho was suddenly discharged after being accused of bribery. It was a futile and disgraceful resignation. Due to Lee Jin-ho's indecision, Yamanashi initially wanted to be dismissed from the position of director of the Academic Affairs Bureau, which planned to establish a position called 'participating officer' to replace the director-general position and implement it in a way that Lee Jin-ho was appointed as a honorable predecessor. However, when this incident broke out, the position of director-general of the Korean people naturally disappeared by leaving the office without any countermeasures. There was a widespread perception in the world that a Korean would be appointed as Lee Jin-ho's successor, but no personnel appointment of the Korean director-general was made. The replacement of the participant officer, which was likely to be achieved if it were not for the bribery suspicion, also fizzled out, and after a long stay, it was eventually destroyed.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 三峰會, "三峰下岡忠治傳", ~ (1930)
  2. "京城日報", ~
  3. "매일신보", ~
  4. "조선일보", ~
  5. "동아일보", ~
  6. "朝鮮新聞", ~
  7. 渡辺豊日子, "朝鮮総督府回顧談", ~ (1984)
  8. "文敎의朝鮮", ~
  9. "新民", ~
  10. "朝鮮及滿洲", ~
  11. "朝鮮公論", ~
  12. 靑柳綱太郞, "總督政治史論" (1928), 京城新聞社
  13. 平井三男, "山梨朝鮮總督의秕政", 齋藤實文書, 5(4)
  14. 原田大六, "在鮮時의想い出", 友邦, 中央日韓協会
  15. 阿部洋, "日本植民地教育政策史料集成(朝鮮篇)" (1991), 龍渓書舎
  16. 岡本眞希子, "植民地官僚의政治史 : 朝鮮・台灣總督府と帝國日本" (2008), 三元社
  17. 李炯植, "朝鮮総督府官僚의統治構想" (2013), 吉川弘文館
  18. 김삼웅, "친일정치 100년사" (1995), 동풍
  19. 김동명, "지배와 저항, 그리고 협력" (2006), 경인문화사
  20. 박은경, "일제하 조선인 관료 연구" (1999), 학민사
  21. 반민족문제연구소, "친일파99인 1~3" (1993), 돌베개
  22. 윤현상, "일제하 초등교육재정의 구조와 변동", 박사, pp.2022
  23. 이형식, "守屋榮夫關係文書" (2021), 아연출판부
  24. 稻葉繼雄, "朝鮮植民地敎育政策史의再檢討" (2010)
  25. 강명숙, "조선총독부 학무국 조선인 관료 연구", 한국교육사학, 42(1) (2020)
  26. 오미영, "이진호(李軫鎬)의 『滿蒙의旅』에 나타난 동부 내몽골", 몽골학, 42 (2015)
  27. 이기훈, "1920~30년대 보통학교와 지역사회", 한국민족운동사학회, 54 (2008)
  28. 이형식, "친일관료 박중양과 조선통치", 일본공간, 26 (2019)
  29. 이형식, "동아시사(下) 반도와 열도의 불협화음" (2010), 제이엔씨
  30. 조은진, "1920년대 관립전문학교 대학 승격 운동의 추이와 성격 : 경성법학전문학교와 경성의학전문학교를 중심으로", 한국문화, 101 (2023)
  31. 최은진, "6・10만세운동 관련 중등학교 학생들의 동맹휴학", 한국근현대사연구, 107 (2023)
  32. 한긍희, "조선총독부의 조선인 도지사 임용정책과 양상", 역사문제연구, 22 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)