당-고려 인사행정에서 시행된 관인 심사제도의 비교사적 검토
A Comparative Historical Review of the Official Verification System Implemented in the Tang Dynasty and Koryo Personnel Administration
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to examine comparative historically the system that examined whether officials who received government posts in the personnel administration of the Tang and Goryeo were eligible for it. The Tang's bureaucracy spread widely in east asian society, and Goryeo accepted it, established a bureaucracy and operated a personnel system. However, the Goryeo system did not follow the Tang's system. Therefore, it is meaningful to review the verification system comparative historically in the personnel administration of the Tang and Goryeo. The Tang's personnel procedures and verification system were divided into two according to the grade and importance of government posts. The 5th or higher and special government posts were recommended by the ministers and selected by the emperor, while the 6th or lower grades were selected by the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs and appointed by the emperor. In the process of drafting personnel orders or issuing personnel orders to go through Chancellery for State Affairs, the 5th or higher and special government posts were reviewed. For the 5th or higher and special government posts, the government officials were examined when the Imperial letter drafted or distributed and passed through Chancellery for State Affairs. For those with 6th or lower grades, the list was submitted to the emperor after the selection of the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs was completed, and the officials were reviewed in the process of passing through Department of State Affairs and Chancellery for State Affairs. The personnel administration and the verification system of Goryeo were quite different from those of the Tang Dynasty. First of all, Goryeo did not distinguish the method of personnel administration according to the high and low of government posts. Therefore, the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs selected the entire civil service officers and military officers, did not give the ministers the right to personnel affairs. Next, the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs posted the results of the selection to the king and received approval, but it was directly delivered to the king without passing through Department of State Affairs and Chancellery for State Affairs. In Goryeo, the way of operating the three chancelleries six branches of the cabinet system was different from Tang, so it was directly told between the king and the six branches of the cabinet system. Therefore, the official verification was not conducted until the king's approval was obtained. In addition, all of the Tang Dynasty's letters of appointment were prepared and issued after deliberation by Chancellery for State Affairs, enabling qualification screening for all government officials. However, in Goryeo, not all letters of appointment were prepared and issued after deliberation by Department of Royal Secretariat-Chancellery because the type of letters of appointment was different from Tang Dynasty. Therefore, it was difficult to create a system to examine the official verification in relation to the issuance of a letter of appointment. When this happened, Goryeo established a system of the review candidates recommended for office implemented by the ministers and censorate officials to examine the government officials. The Tang Dynasty's distribution of personnel rights and screening system is aimed at reducing favoritism and wrongdoing in the selection process. In particular, high-ranking officials were selected through consultation between the monarch and the ministers, and provided a lot of information to review through Policy Reviewer and advice from officials. This was characterized by negotiation politics. The system of Goryeo of the review candidates recommended for office system prevented the king's arbitrary selection of government officials, respected the king's right to make decisions on personnel appointments, and had the character of consulting between the king and the bureaucrats.
Abstract
This paper aims to examine comparative historically the system that examined whether officials who received government posts in the personnel administration of the Tang and Goryeo were eligible for it. The Tang's bureaucracy spread widely in east asian society, and Goryeo accepted it, established a bureaucracy and operated a personnel system. However, the Goryeo system did not follow the Tang's system. Therefore, it is meaningful to review the verification system comparative historically in the personnel administration of the Tang and Goryeo. The Tang's personnel procedures and verification system were divided into two according to the grade and importance of government posts. The 5th or higher and special government posts were recommended by the ministers and selected by the emperor, while the 6th or lower grades were selected by the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs and appointed by the emperor. In the process of drafting personnel orders or issuing personnel orders to go through Chancellery for State Affairs, the 5th or higher and special government posts were reviewed. For the 5th or higher and special government posts, the government officials were examined when the Imperial letter drafted or distributed and passed through Chancellery for State Affairs. For those with 6th or lower grades, the list was submitted to the emperor after the selection of the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs was completed, and the officials were reviewed in the process of passing through Department of State Affairs and Chancellery for State Affairs. The personnel administration and the verification system of Goryeo were quite different from those of the Tang Dynasty. First of all, Goryeo did not distinguish the method of personnel administration according to the high and low of government posts. Therefore, the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs selected the entire civil service officers and military officers, did not give the ministers the right to personnel affairs. Next, the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs posted the results of the selection to the king and received approval, but it was directly delivered to the king without passing through Department of State Affairs and Chancellery for State Affairs. In Goryeo, the way of operating the three chancelleries six branches of the cabinet system was different from Tang, so it was directly told between the king and the six branches of the cabinet system. Therefore, the official verification was not conducted until the king's approval was obtained. In addition, all of the Tang Dynasty's letters of appointment were prepared and issued after deliberation by Chancellery for State Affairs, enabling qualification screening for all government officials. However, in Goryeo, not all letters of appointment were prepared and issued after deliberation by Department of Royal Secretariat-Chancellery because the type of letters of appointment was different from Tang Dynasty. Therefore, it was difficult to create a system to examine the official verification in relation to the issuance of a letter of appointment. When this happened, Goryeo established a system of the review candidates recommended for office implemented by the ministers and censorate officials to examine the government officials. The Tang Dynasty's distribution of personnel rights and screening system is aimed at reducing favoritism and wrongdoing in the selection process. In particular, high-ranking officials were selected through consultation between the monarch and the ministers, and provided a lot of information to review through Policy Reviewer and advice from officials. This was characterized by negotiation politics. The system of Goryeo of the review candidates recommended for office system prevented the king's arbitrary selection of government officials, respected the king's right to make decisions on personnel appointments, and had the character of consulting between the king and the bureaucrats.
참고문헌 (74)
- "高麗史", ~
- "高麗史節要", ~
- "太宗實錄", ~
- "世宗實錄", ~
- "成宗實錄", ~
- "破閑集", ~
- "補閑集", ~
- 노명호, "韓國古代中世古文書硏究 上" (2000), 서울대학교출판부
- "舊唐書", ~
- "新唐書", ~
- "唐會要", ~
- "舊五代史", ~
- "宋史", ~
- "資治通鑒", ~
- "通典", ~
- "唐六典", ~
- "冊府元龜", ~
- "唐令拾遺", ~
- "玉海", ~
- "唐方鎮年表", ~
- "陸贄集", ~
- "白居易文集校注", ~
- "元稹集", ~
- "新編元稹集", ~
- 박용운, "高麗時代 臺諫制度 硏究" (1980), 일지사
- 김난옥, "高麗時代 賤事・賤役良人 硏究" (2000), 신서원
- 박재우, "고려 국정운영의 체계와 왕권" (2005), 새문사
- 박준호, "예의 패턴 : 조선시대 문서행정의 역사" (2009), 소와당
- 박재우, "고려전기 대간제도 연구" (2014), 새문사
- 郁贤皓, "唐刺史考全編" (2000), 安徽大學出版社
- 刘后滨, "唐代中書門下體制研究" (2004), 齊魯書社
- 陳志堅, "唐代州郡制度研究" (2005), 上海古籍出版社
- 刘后滨, "唐代選官政務研究" (2016), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 王勋成, "唐代铨选与文学" (2021), 中華書局
- 김용덕, "李丙燾博士華甲紀念論叢" (1956), 일조각
- 변태섭, "고려의 中書門下省에 대하여", 역사교육, 10 (1967)
- 변태섭, "고려시대 중앙정치기구의 행정체계", 역사학보, 47 (1970)
- 변태섭, "한국사 13" (1993), 국사편찬위원회
- 박용운, "고려시대 官員의 陞黜과 考課", 역사학보, 145 (1995)
- 정병준, "당 후기의 吏部 銓選과 官途의 다변화", 신라문화재학술발표논문집 (1998), 신라문화선양회
- 박재우, "韓國古代中世古文書硏究 下" (2000), 서울대학교출판부
- 최연식, "韓國古代中世古文書硏究 下" (2000), 서울대학교출판부
- 박재우, "고려전기 王命의 종류와 반포", 진단학보, (95), pp.29~54 (2003), 진단학회
- 박재우, "고려 국정운영의 체계와 왕권" (2005), 새문사
- 박재우, "15세기 인사문서의 양식 변화와 성격", 역사와 현실, (59), pp.31~68 (2006), 한국역사연구회
- 박재우, "고려 政案의 양식과 기초 자료 - 鄭仁卿政案을 중심으로", 古文書硏究, 28, pp.89~110 (2006), 한국고문서학회
- 박재우, "고려전기 6部 判事의 운영과 권력관계", 사학연구, (87), pp.1~46 (2007), 한국사학회
- 박준호, "고려후기와 조선초기의 인사 문서 연구", 古文書硏究, 31, pp.107~129 (2007), 한국고문서학회[DOI]
- 심영환, "조선초기 태조 7년(1398) 李和尙妻李氏<封爵牒>考", 역사와 실학, 39, pp.5~31 (2009), 역사실학회
- 박재우, "고려시대 紅牌의 양식과 특징- 「장량수홍패」를 중심으로 -", 古文書硏究, 37, pp.1~33 (2010), 한국고문서학회[DOI]
- 박재우, "고려시대 署經의 행정절차와 성격", 역사문화연구, (36), pp.3~40 (2010), 역사문화연구소
- 카와니시 유야, "頤齋亂藁 辛丑日曆 소재 麗末鮮初 고문서에 대하여", 古文書硏究, 36, pp.187~209 (2010), 한국고문서학회[DOI]
- 심영환, "변화와 정착-여말선초의 朝謝文書" (2011), 민속원
- 박성호, "朝謝文書의 구조와 용어" (2011), 민속원
- 노인환, "변화와 정착-여말선초의 朝謝文書" (2011), 민속원
- 김정희, "당대의 吏部 銓選과 관료 인사", 동양사학연구, (121), pp.139~187 (2012), 동양사학회
- 박성종, "朝謝의 사용 의미와 文書式", 古文書硏究, 42, pp.1~30 (2013), 한국고문서학회[DOI]
- 박재우, "고려후기 인사행정과 인사문서에 대한 검토", 한국사연구, (162), pp.253~291 (2013), 한국사연구회
- 刘后滨, "盛唐政治制度研究" (2019), 中國人民大學出版社
- 史睿, "唐代前期銓選制度的演進", 歷史研究, 2 (2007)
- 刘后滨, "唐宋间选官文书及其裁决机制的变化", 历史研究, 3 (2008)
- 寧欣, "唐史識見錄" (2009), 商務印書館
- 寧欣, "唐史識見錄" (2009), 商務印書館
- 吕志兴, "宋代的 王言之制 研究", 中国法律史学会2012年学术年会论文集 (2012)
- 杨芹, "宋代制诰文书研究" (2014), 上海古籍出版社
- 吳曉豐, "中晚唐兩制草詔格局的形成及演變", 史學月刊, 1 (2020)
- 孟憲實, "唐代冊禮及其改革", 歷史研究, 3 (2021)
- 李全德, "信息与权力 : 宋代的文书行政" (2022), 社会科学文献出版社
- 中村裕一, "唐代官文書研究" (1991), 中文出版社
- 中村裕一, "唐代官文書硏究" (1991), 中文出版社
- 毛漢光, "論唐代之封駁", 國立中正大學學報, 3(1) (1992)
- 矢木毅, "高麗官僚制度硏究" (2008), 京都大學學術出版會
- 大庭脩, "唐告身と日本古代の位階制" (2003), 學校法人皇學館出版部
- 川西裕也, "高麗末 朝鮮初における任命文書體系の再檢討", 朝鮮學報, 220 (2011)
