이승만의 북진통일 주장과 외교적 영향— 1954년 제네바 회담을 중심으로 —
Rhee Syngman’s ‘March to North’ Claim and its diplomatic implication— Focusing on 1954 Geneva Conference —
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Throughout his regime, Rhee Syngman is known for consistent claim of ‘March to North unification’ theme in various direction. It affected not only Korean politics, but Korea-US relations and UN’s discussion of the Korean problem. Even though ‘March to North’ was a powerful ideology of Rhee era, scholars saw it as a political slogan or negotiating leverage on US. But these approaches lacks explanation why Rhee abundantly stick to his claim, even after Korea and US agreed on the conclusion of ROK-US mutual defense treaty. Also, it has not been analyzed how Rhee’s claim affected international community’s discussion of the Korean problem. This treatise focus on Rhee’s perceptions and views behind ‘March to North’ claim, so as to understand why Rhee even risked a rupture of relations with US. By analyzing letters between Rhee and his close aide, this treatise asserts that Rhee’s anti-communism belief was a key factor of ‘March to North’ claim in conjunction with his understanding of the Cold war and international situation of East Asia. This treatise also argues that ‘March to North’ theme was the diplomatic strategy of Korea at 1954 Geneva conference. It was Rhee’s policy not to consent to any other resolutions of US and participating parties, unless they ‘respect’ Rhee’s perception of the Korean problem. It was an detrimental strategy to Korea’s national interest, rather than a leverage on US.
Abstract
Throughout his regime, Rhee Syngman is known for consistent claim of ‘March to North unification’ theme in various direction. It affected not only Korean politics, but Korea-US relations and UN’s discussion of the Korean problem. Even though ‘March to North’ was a powerful ideology of Rhee era, scholars saw it as a political slogan or negotiating leverage on US. But these approaches lacks explanation why Rhee abundantly stick to his claim, even after Korea and US agreed on the conclusion of ROK-US mutual defense treaty. Also, it has not been analyzed how Rhee’s claim affected international community’s discussion of the Korean problem. This treatise focus on Rhee’s perceptions and views behind ‘March to North’ claim, so as to understand why Rhee even risked a rupture of relations with US. By analyzing letters between Rhee and his close aide, this treatise asserts that Rhee’s anti-communism belief was a key factor of ‘March to North’ claim in conjunction with his understanding of the Cold war and international situation of East Asia. This treatise also argues that ‘March to North’ theme was the diplomatic strategy of Korea at 1954 Geneva conference. It was Rhee’s policy not to consent to any other resolutions of US and participating parties, unless they ‘respect’ Rhee’s perception of the Korean problem. It was an detrimental strategy to Korea’s national interest, rather than a leverage on US.
참고문헌 (34)
- "이승만관계서한자료집 1~6권", ~
- "Foreign Relations of United States", ~
- "United Nations documents", ~
- "동아일보", ~
- "조선일보", ~
- "경향신문", ~
- 외무부 외교안보연구원, "외교여록-변영태 장관 회고록-", ~ (1997)
- 대통령기록관, "이승만 대통령 영문서한 번역집Ⅰ", ~ (2012)
- "대한민국 외교부 외교사료관 소장문서 롤 번호 D-0001", ~
- 김계동, "정전협정 전후 한미상호방위조약 체결협상" (2019), 국립외교원
- 박태균, "조봉암 연구" (1995), 창작과비평사
- 이완범, "미국의 한국 정치개입사 연구 1" (2022), 한국학중앙연구원출판부
- 정병준, "우남 이승만 연구" (2005), 역사비평사
- 정병준, "한국전쟁 38선 충돌과 전쟁의 형성" (2006), 돌베개
- 강혜경, "이승만 정권의 ‘북진통일론’과 민족주의 담론", 통일논총, 17 (1995)
- 곽경상, "해방 후 남한 석유시장의 재편과 울산 정유공장 건설계획", 동방학지, 176 (2016)
- 권오중, "제네바 한국평화회담(1954)의 진행, 결과, 그리고 의미 : 한반도 6자회담의 원형?", 통일정책연구, 14(2) (2005)
- 김경수, "한국전에서의 인도의 역할", 한국정치외교사논총, 5 (1989)
- 김보영, "제네바 정치회담과 남북한 통일정책의 비교연구", 국사관논총, 75 (1997)
- 김보영, "1954년 제네바정치회담과 외국군 철수 의제", 군사, 95 (2015)
- 김연철, "1954년 제네바 회담과 동북아 냉전질서", 아세아연구, 54(1) (2001)
- 라종일, "제네바 회담 : 회담의 정치(1954. 4. 26.", 6. 15. ), 1997, pp.1, ~
- 서중석, "이승만과 북진통일-1950년대 극우반공독재의 해부-", 역사비평, 31 (1995)
- 송재경, "이승만의 한미동맹 구상과 대미외교의 전개(1948-1960년)", 박사, 국사학과, pp.2023
- 오정현, "1954년 제네바 정치회담과 한반도 국제관계 : 전후 분단체제의 형성", 통일정책연구, 30(1) (2021)
- 원태재, "6･25전쟁과 영국의 역할", 군사, 59 (2006)
- 이동원, "1954년 밴 플리트 사절단의 동아시아 냉전 구상과 한미관계의 구성", 군사, 120 (2021)
- 이신철, "1954년 제네바 정치회담시기 남･북의 통일론", 사림, 25 (2006)
- 이완범, "이승만과 6･25전쟁" (2012), 연세대학교 출판문화원
- 이혜정, "1954년 한미 합의의사록의 재조명 : ‘114일의 한미 분규’", 한국정치연구, 29(3) (2020)
- 정인섭, "UN 총회 한국정부 승인 결의(제195호)성립 과정과 의미 분석", 서울국제법연구, 29(1) (2022)
- 홍석률, "이승만 정권의 북진통일론과 냉전외교정책", 한국사연구, 85 (1994)
- 홍용표, "1954년 제네바회의와 한국전쟁의 정치적 종결 모색", 한국정치외교사논총, 28(1) (2006)
- 황인수, "한국전 이후 쟁점과 제네바 협정", 시민정치학회보, 3 (2000)