일본 막부 편찬 국회도(國繪圖)에 표현된 국경과 독도영유권 인식

Abstract

We analyzed the solution of border problems in the production process of Kuniezu(國繪圖) in Edo period. This map emphasizes to solve border problem, the border is based on the assumption of resolving border disputes through mutual confirmation of neighboring countries. And cartography has a strong nature of military political rule and functions to curb the occurrence of border disputes. The Edo Shogunate confirmed the border through the policy of solving the border problem and the changed territorial inquiry in the cartography work. The fact that Ulleungdo and Dokdo were not included in this map proves that Ulleungdo and Dokdo are not Japanese territory. Ulleungdo and Dokdo has not been given rice yields and has never been listed on the manor's seal, so it can not be said that Oya and Murakawa have been receipt Ulleungdo and Dokdo. In addition, the land of the Edo period was managed by the Shogunate, the lord, and the temple, so it was a system that individuals could not be able to receipt and could not make huge profits. The Edo Shogunate was regarded as a pirate if it did not pass through Tsushima because Tsushima was responsible for diplomacy and trade with Joseon while it was in seclusion policy, and Oya and Murakawa sails for Ulleungdo and Dokdo was illegal. The fact that Oya and Murakawa were given a Voyage Licenses of Ulleungdo was falsely decorated to take exclusive rights from competitors in order to pursue exclusive rights. The Voyage Licenses of Ulleungdo is different from the formal license, and the Voyage License is disposable that must be returned after voyage. In conclusion, it can be seen that it is false that Oya, Muraka were receipt Ulleungdo and Dokdo by the Edo Shogunate's policy of seclusion, land system, cartography, and a Prohibition order of Voyage to Ulleungdo and Dokdo.