본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 부정 요소 ‘아니하-’와 ‘아니’의 변화에 대한 통시적 분석

Diachronic Changes of Core Negative Elements ‘aniha-’ and ‘ani’ in Korean Negation.

2

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The purpose of this paper is to analyze diachronic changes of core negative elements ‘aniha-' and ‘ani’ in Korean negation. Linguistic factors such as Head Preference Principle, Headedness Principle, Neg-Criterion, and internal contraction of the negative elements and subsequent grammaticalization trigger the diachronic changes of the negative predicate ‘aniha-' into ‘an-(않-)' and the negative adverb ‘ani' into ‘an(안)'. The diachronic reanalysis of a syntactic structure from a simple clause predicate negation into an embedded clause negation was caused by a communicational strategy to reinforce the negative meaning of propositional expression. Literary style NPs borrowed from Chinese characters also gave an impetus to the reanalysis of a syntactic structure of negation in the process of category change from an NP into a verb stem via a nominal verb in order to satisfy morpho-syntactic conditions in Korean negation. It is inferred that the aspect of diachronic changes in Korean negation complies with the Negative Cycle Hypothesis of Jespersen(1917), which has explained the aspect of diachronic changes in English and French negation although there appear discrepancies with the change of the times one another.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze diachronic changes of core negative elements ‘aniha-' and ‘ani’ in Korean negation. Linguistic factors such as Head Preference Principle, Headedness Principle, Neg-Criterion, and internal contraction of the negative elements and subsequent grammaticalization trigger the diachronic changes of the negative predicate ‘aniha-' into ‘an-(않-)' and the negative adverb ‘ani' into ‘an(안)'. The diachronic reanalysis of a syntactic structure from a simple clause predicate negation into an embedded clause negation was caused by a communicational strategy to reinforce the negative meaning of propositional expression. Literary style NPs borrowed from Chinese characters also gave an impetus to the reanalysis of a syntactic structure of negation in the process of category change from an NP into a verb stem via a nominal verb in order to satisfy morpho-syntactic conditions in Korean negation. It is inferred that the aspect of diachronic changes in Korean negation complies with the Negative Cycle Hypothesis of Jespersen(1917), which has explained the aspect of diachronic changes in English and French negation although there appear discrepancies with the change of the times one another.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 남풍현, "국어 부정법의 발달", 문법연구, 3, pp.55~81 (1976), 탑출판사
  2. 박상수, "문법화에 대한 소고", 영미어문학연구, 6, pp.111~138 (2003), 영미어문학회
  3. 박상수, "EFL 환경에서 영어 문장의 산출 및 구성성분의 인지와 언어 운용능력의 상관관계", 언어과학, 17(4), pp.59~78 (2010), 한국언어과학회
  4. 박형우, "국어 부정문의 변천 연구" (2004), 한국문화사
  5. 이지영, "한국어 용언부정문의 역사적 변화" (2008), 태학사
  6. 최기호, "한국어 변천사" (1994), 토담
  7. 허재영, "부정문의 통시적 연구" (2002), 역락
  8. 허철구, "국어 합성동사 형성과 어기분리", 박사, pp.1997
  9. 홍종선, "국어 부정법의 변천연구", 석사, pp.1980
  10. Auwera, J. van der, "The Jespersen Cycles, In Cyclical Change", pp.35~72 (2009), John Benjamins
  11. Gelderen, Elly van, "Grammaticalization as Economy" (2004), John Benjamins
  12. Gelderen, Elly van, "Economy, Innovation and Prescriptivism: From Spec to Head and Head to Head", Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 7, pp.59~98 (2004)
  13. Gelderen, Elly van, "Cyclical Change" (2009), John Benjamins
  14. Gelderen, Elly van, "The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty" (2011), Oxford University Press
  15. Haegeman, L, "The Syntax of Negation" (1995), Cambridge University Press
  16. Hopper, P. J, "Grammaticalization" (1993), Cambridge University Press
  17. Jespersen, O, "Negation in English and Other Languages, In Selected Writings of Otto Jespersen", pp.3~151 (1937), Senjo Publishing Co
  18. Lightfoot, D, "The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution" (1999), Blackwell
  19. Meillet, A, "Linguistique Historique et Linguistique Générale", pp.130~148 (1958), Champion
  20. Miller, D. G, "Language Change and Linguistic Theory Ⅱ" (2010), Oxford University Press
  21. Radford, R, "An Introduction to English Sentence Structure" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  22. Roberts, I, "Diachronic Syntax" (2007), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)