본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Study on Korean Negation ‘an’ and ‘anh’

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The purpose of this paper is to explain the behavior of quantifiers and NPI licensing in Korean Negation ‘an’ and ‘anh’. The main assumption is that ‘anh’ in LFN projects the NegP and ‘an’ in SFN occupies the [Spec, NegP] position like French negation. I suggest that the SFN ‘an’ is a negative adverbial prefix occupying [Spec, NegP] and the LFN ‘anh’ is a negative verbal head, projecting NegP. In SFN, I assume that ‘an’ in [Spec, NegP] is responsible for the scope relationship with quantifiers, and the head of NegP, ‘anh’ is responsible for licensing NPIs. In LFN, I assume that ‘an’ in [Spec, NegP] is a null category. The null negative adverb, ‘an’ adjoins to any syntactic position marking the scope of negation in relation to quantifiers. In conclusion, I analyse that ‘an’ is a scope marker and ‘anh’ is a NPI lincenser.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explain the behavior of quantifiers and NPI licensing in Korean Negation ‘an’ and ‘anh’. The main assumption is that ‘anh’ in LFN projects the NegP and ‘an’ in SFN occupies the [Spec, NegP] position like French negation. I suggest that the SFN ‘an’ is a negative adverbial prefix occupying [Spec, NegP] and the LFN ‘anh’ is a negative verbal head, projecting NegP. In SFN, I assume that ‘an’ in [Spec, NegP] is responsible for the scope relationship with quantifiers, and the head of NegP, ‘anh’ is responsible for licensing NPIs. In LFN, I assume that ‘an’ in [Spec, NegP] is a null category. The null negative adverb, ‘an’ adjoins to any syntactic position marking the scope of negation in relation to quantifiers. In conclusion, I analyse that ‘an’ is a scope marker and ‘anh’ is a NPI lincenser.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Beak, Judy Yoo-Kyung, "Negation and object shift in early child Korean" (1995), MIT Press
  2. Belletti, A., "Generalized Verb Movement" (1990), Rosenberg and Sellier
  3. Cho, Junmo, "The nature of legibility conditions", 박사, pp.2000
  4. Haegeman, L., "Theory and Description in Generative Grammar: A Case Study in West Flemish" (1992), Cambridge UP
  5. Haegeman, L., "Introduction to Govermnent and Binding Theory" (1994), Blackwel
  6. Hagstrom, Paul, "Do-support in Korean: Evidence for an Interpretive Morphology", Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar (1996), Sookmyung Women’s University
  7. Hagstrom, Paul, "Scope interactions and phrasal movement in Korean negation in : Harvard studies in Korean Linguistics VII" (1997), Harvard North Carolina
  8. Park, Kabyong, "Light verb constructions in Korean and Japanese", 박사, pp.1992
  9. Park, Myung-Kwan, "A morpho-syntactic study of Korean verbal inflection", 박사, pp.1994
  10. Song, Seok Choong, "The scope of negation in Korean", Hangul, 173, pp.327~351 (1981), Hanshin Publication
  11. Yuan, Boping, "The Syntax of Clausal Negation in French and English Speakers’ L2 Chinese", Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2002), pp.352~360 (2003), Cascadilla Proceedings Project

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)