A Corpus-Based Analysis of Interactional Functions of Korean Inferential Evidential Marker, -n tus (ha)-
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is an analysis of the inferential evidential marker in Korean, -n tus ha-, which can be translated into English as ‘to seem, I think, it looks like, or I guess,' using a discourse analytic approach. This study investigates the pragmatic and interactional functions of the form in spoken/written discourse. In order to accomplish this, an authentic and contemporary corpus is alo used to explicate the systematic patterns of the use of the target forms, using a frequency distribution across different genres and registers. The findings of this study demonstrate that the speaker's choice of the target evidential markers is not solely based on the source of information as most research on evidentiality claims, but also on the speaker's stance, as each expresses a different psychological and or interactional position. Overall, this analysis will contribute to the study of the Korean language as it elucidates the complex relationship between grammar and socio-cultural interaction observed in the use of the target forms in Korean conversation, and will contribute to future studies on the Korean language.
Abstract
This study is an analysis of the inferential evidential marker in Korean, -n tus ha-, which can be translated into English as ‘to seem, I think, it looks like, or I guess,' using a discourse analytic approach. This study investigates the pragmatic and interactional functions of the form in spoken/written discourse. In order to accomplish this, an authentic and contemporary corpus is alo used to explicate the systematic patterns of the use of the target forms, using a frequency distribution across different genres and registers. The findings of this study demonstrate that the speaker's choice of the target evidential markers is not solely based on the source of information as most research on evidentiality claims, but also on the speaker's stance, as each expresses a different psychological and or interactional position. Overall, this analysis will contribute to the study of the Korean language as it elucidates the complex relationship between grammar and socio-cultural interaction observed in the use of the target forms in Korean conversation, and will contribute to future studies on the Korean language.
참고문헌 (37)
- 안주호, "한국어 추측 표현의 통사 의미 연구", 새국어교육, (68), pp.97~121 (2004), 한국국어교육학회
- Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., "Evidentiality" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., "Typological Studies in Language, vol. 54", pp.54~ (2003), John Benjamins
- Biber, Douglas, "Register Genre and Style" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- 차지현, "Discourse Functions of -kes kathta in Korean Conversation", 언어사실과 관점, 37, pp.253~277 (2016), 언어정보연구원[DOI]
- Chafe, Wallace, "Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology" (1986), Ablex
- Chung, Kyung-Sook, "Spatial Deictic Tense and Evidentials in Korean", Natural Language Semantics, 15, pp.187~219 (2007)
- Chung, Kyung-Sook, "Space in Tense: The Interaction of Tense, Aspect, Evidentiality and Speech Acts in Korean" (2012), John Benjamins
- Hopper, Paul, "Approaches to Grammaticalization 1", pp.17~36 (1991), John Benjamins
- Hopper, Paul J., "Grammaticalization" (1993), Cambridge University Press
- Jeong, In-Ah, "A Study on Evidentiality in the Korean Language", Ph.D, pp.2010
- 진기호, "어휘 의미를 활용한 유의적 문형 교수 방안", 한국어교육, 17(1), pp.395~413 (2006), 국제한국어교육학회
- Kärk äinen, Elise, "Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I Think" (2003), John Benjamins
- Kärk äinen, Elise, "Stancetaking in Discourse", pp.183~219 (2007), John Benjamins
- Kim. Cha-Kyun, "‘ul'kwa ‘keyss'uy uymy ‘The Meaning of ul and keyss'Hankwul", The Korean Language, 173, pp.65~114 (1981)
- 김해연, "국어 담화에서의 ‘-는 것 같다’의 화용적 의미와 상호작용적 기능", 언어와언어학, (52), pp.25~52 (2011), 언어연구소
- Korean Linguistics 12, "Japanese", pp.2003, Kim, Minju
- Kim, Minju, "Evidentiality in Achieving Entitlement, Objectivity, and Detachment in Korean Conversation", Discourse Studies, 7(1), pp.87~108 (2005)
- 김민주, "The Emergence of the Korean Modal -keyss-: From Causative to Epistemic and Volitive Modal", 담화와 인지, 15(2), pp.1~27 (2008), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- Kim, Namkil, "On the Expression of ‘Imminence’ in Korean", The Linguistic Society of Korea, 32, pp.39~59 (2002)
- Kim, Sunghwa, "A Study on Korean Aspect" (1992), Hansin
- Ko, Youngkun, (2007), Taehaksa
- Kwon, Iksoo, "Please Confirm what I Inferred: On the Korean InferentialVidential Marker -napo-", Journal of Pragmatics, 44, pp.958~969 (2012)
- Lee, Hyo Sang, "Tense, Aspect and Modality: A Discourse-Pragmatic Analysis of Verbal Suffixes in Korean from a Typological Perspective", Ph.D, pp.1991
- Lee, Hyo Sang, "Cognitive Constraints on Expressing Newly Perceived Information, with Reference to Epistemic Modal Suffixes in Korean", Cognitive Linguistics, 4(2), pp.135~167 (1993)
- 이준호, "TTT 모형을 활용한 추측 표현 교육 연구－‘-는 것 같다’, ‘-나 보다’, ‘-는 모양이다’를 중심으로－", 이중언어학, (44), pp.247~273 (2010), 이중언어학회[DOI]
- 이윤진, "한국어 교육에서 ‘-것 같다’ 제시 방안 연구", 이중언어학, (34), pp.323~348 (2007), 이중언어학회[DOI]
- Mullan, Kerry, "Expressing Opinions in French and Australian English Discourse: A Semantic and Interactional Analysis" (2010), John Benjamins
- Ochs, Elinor, "Discourse across Time and Space 5", pp.1~13 (1977), Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California
- 이성하, "From Politeness Discourse Strategy to Grammar: Grammaticalization of Stance Markers", 언어과학연구, (59), pp.253~283 (2011), 언어과학회
- Sohn, Ho-Min, "The Korean Language" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- 송경안, "Evidentials in Korean", 언어학, 17(2), pp.1~20 (2009), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- 송민영, "Is -keyss Really a Future Tense Marker?", 현대문법연구, 40, pp.135~159 (2005), 현대문법학회
- Strauss, Susan, "Cognitive Realization Markers in Korean: A Discourse-Pragmatic Study of the Sentence-Ending Particles -wun, -ney and tela", Language Sciences, 27, pp.437~480 (2005)
- Strauss, Susan, "Cognition through the Lens of Discourse and Interaction: The Case of -wun, -ney, and -ela", Japanese, 2007, pp.15, 35~46
- Thornborrow, Joanna, "Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse" (2002), Routledge
- Willet, Thomas L, "A Cross-Linguistic Survey of the Grammaticalization of Evidentiality", Studies in Language, 12(1), pp.51~97 (1998)