본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어 전치사 on과 이탈리아어 전치사 su의 인지언어학적 고찰

A Cognitive Linguistic Study on the English Preposition on and the Italian Preposition su.

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper compares the English preposition “on” with the Italian preposition “su”, based on cognitive linguistics and shows that ‘the contact of a trajector with a landmark' is their common prototypical meaning. It is altered into three kinds of meanings: contact state alteration, stative state alteration and visibility alteration. These alterations belong to prototypical meaning, because their basic meaning is 'contact' in a broad meaning. The first two are common in both prepositions “on” and “su”. However, the last one is found only in English. Both spacial prepositions are commonly used as a source concept to conceptualize several abstract target concepts such as time, ground and reason of action, theme of writing or lecture, topic of book or paper, aggravation and addition. The spacial meanings of two prepositions are metaphorically extended in different ways as well. Nevertheless, their difference is not so significant. Finally, this paper shows that abstract extended meanings of the Italian preposition are very scant, compared to English. According to Talmy(2000), it depends on the cognitive difference between two different language speakers.

Abstract

This paper compares the English preposition “on” with the Italian preposition “su”, based on cognitive linguistics and shows that ‘the contact of a trajector with a landmark' is their common prototypical meaning. It is altered into three kinds of meanings: contact state alteration, stative state alteration and visibility alteration. These alterations belong to prototypical meaning, because their basic meaning is 'contact' in a broad meaning. The first two are common in both prepositions “on” and “su”. However, the last one is found only in English. Both spacial prepositions are commonly used as a source concept to conceptualize several abstract target concepts such as time, ground and reason of action, theme of writing or lecture, topic of book or paper, aggravation and addition. The spacial meanings of two prepositions are metaphorically extended in different ways as well. Nevertheless, their difference is not so significant. Finally, this paper shows that abstract extended meanings of the Italian preposition are very scant, compared to English. According to Talmy(2000), it depends on the cognitive difference between two different language speakers.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 김일곤, "영어 전치사 on의 인지적 의미분석", 담화와 인지, 8, pp.43~67 (2001)
  2. 이기동, "On의 의미", 어학연구, 17, pp.199~214 (1980)
  3. 이기동, "영어전치사 연구" (2002), 교문사
  4. 이창희, "전치사 on의 의미확대현상 분석", 언어과학연구, 20, pp.275~296 (2001)
  5. 정희자, "전치사 의미의 확장", 새한영어영문학, 49(1), pp.239~261 (2007), 새한영어영문학회
  6. 한국외국어대학출판부, "이한사전" (1992), 한국외국어대학출판부
  7. Algeo, J, "British or American English?" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  8. Beitel, D, "The Embodied, Image-Schematic Approach to the Polysemy of the Spatial Preposition ‘on’", Paper presented at the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (1997)
  9. Bowerman, M, "The Origins of Children’s Spatial Semantic Categories: Cognitive versus Linguistic Determinants, In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity", pp.145~176 (1996), Cambridge University Press
  10. Bowerman, M, "Learning How to Structure Space for Language: A Crosslinguistic Perspective, In Language and Space", pp.385~436 (1996), MIT Press
  11. Brugman, C, "Cognitive Topology and Lexical Networks, In Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Perspectives from Psycholinguistics, Neuropschology, and Artificial Intelligence" (1988), Georgetown University Press
  12. Catiglioni, L, "Il vocabolario della lingua latina" (2007), Loescher editore
  13. A Semantic Analysis of English Locative Prepositions, "Cooper, G", Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc, ~, pp.Report no. 1587 (1968)
  14. Evans, V, "Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction" (2006), Edinburgh University Press
  15. Frenda, A, "Metaphor and Space: A Cognitive-based Analysis of Irish and Italian Prepositions", 석사, pp.2005
  16. Frenda, A, "Cross-linguistic Comparisons: A Case Study Involving Irish and Italian Prepositions", ITB Journal, 12, pp.23~29 (2005)
  17. Goddard. C, "On and on: Verbal Explications for a Polysemic Network", In Cognitive Linguistics, 13(3), pp.277~294 (2002)
  18. Johnson, M, "The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason" (1987), Chicago University Press
  19. Johnson, M, "Knowing through the Body", Philosophical Psychology, 4, pp.3~20 (1991)
  20. Kövecses, Z, "Metaphor in Culture: University and Variation" (2005), Cambridge University Press
  21. Lakoff, G, "Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind" (1987), University Press
  22. Lakoff, G, "The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image- Schemas?", Cognitive Linguistics, 1, pp.39~74 (1990)
  23. Lakoff. G, "Metaphors We Live By" (2003), The University of Chicago
  24. Langacker, R, "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol. I, Stanford" (1987), Stanford University Press
  25. Langacker, R, "Concept, Image and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar" (1991), Mouton de Gruyter
  26. Leech, G, "Towards a Semantic Description of English" (1969), Longman
  27. Patota, G, "Il grande dizionario garzanti della lingua italiana" (2008), Garzanti linguistica
  28. Biagi concise. terza edizione. dizionario inglese italiano di Giuseppe Ragazzini e Adele Biagi, "il Ragazzini", pp.1997, Ragazzini, G
  29. Rosch, E, "Principles of Categorization, In Cognition and Categorization", pp.27~48 (1978), Lawrence Erlbaum
  30. Simpson, D. P, "Cassell’s New Latin-English English-Latin Dictionary" (1959), Cassell
  31. Talmy, L, "Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring" (2000), MIT Press
  32. Taylor, J, "Contrasting Prepositional Categories: English and Italian, In Topics in Cognitive Linguistics", pp.299~326 (1988), John Benjamins
  33. Trifone, P, "Grammatica Italiana di Base" (2000), Gianichelli
  34. Tyler. A, "The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition" (2003), Cambridge University
  35. 김동환, "인지언어학 개론: 개정판" (2010), 태학사
  36. Wierzbicka, A, "Why do We Say IN April, ON Thursday, AT 10 O’clock? In Search of an Explanation?", Studies in Language, 17(2), pp.437~454 (1993)
  37. Zingarelli, N, "lo Zingarelli minore: vocabolario della lingua Italiana di Nicola Zingarelli edizione Terzo millennio" (2001), Zanichelli

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)