교체의 대상과 조건에 대하여
On Objects and Conditions of Alternation.
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims at arguing that conditions of alternation of grammatical units are restricted to phonological conditions and lexical conditions. Not only morphemes are alternated but also syntactic units are alternated. We can say about irregular verbs only if we admit that verbs are alternated under some conditions. There are lots of conditions by which morphemes are alternated. Some scholars suggest there are Phonological conditions, lexical conditions, syntactic conditions, semantic conditions, pragmatic conditions, stylistic conditions. But we don't need semantic conditions, pragmatic conditions, and stylistic conditions, as long as we admit that languages consist of meaning and sound. Meaning is not a condition but a part of a morpheme or a grammatical unit. Strictly speaking, phonological conditions are phonological conditions of grammatical units. Therefore we can suggest semantical conditions of grammatical units. And lexical conditions of grammatical units are needed when neither phonological conditions nor semantical conditions are not concerned.
Abstract
This paper aims at arguing that conditions of alternation of grammatical units are restricted to phonological conditions and lexical conditions. Not only morphemes are alternated but also syntactic units are alternated. We can say about irregular verbs only if we admit that verbs are alternated under some conditions. There are lots of conditions by which morphemes are alternated. Some scholars suggest there are Phonological conditions, lexical conditions, syntactic conditions, semantic conditions, pragmatic conditions, stylistic conditions. But we don't need semantic conditions, pragmatic conditions, and stylistic conditions, as long as we admit that languages consist of meaning and sound. Meaning is not a condition but a part of a morpheme or a grammatical unit. Strictly speaking, phonological conditions are phonological conditions of grammatical units. Therefore we can suggest semantical conditions of grammatical units. And lexical conditions of grammatical units are needed when neither phonological conditions nor semantical conditions are not concerned.
참고문헌 (23)
- 고영근, "형태소의 분석 한계", 언어학, 3, pp.29~35 (1978), 한국언어학회
- 고영근, "형태소의 교체와 형태론의 범위 -형태음운론적 교체를 중심으로-", 國語學, (46), pp.19~52 (2005), 국어학회
- 김경아, "형태음운론적 교체와 형태음운부", 형태론, 1(2), pp.305~317 (1999)
- 김경아, "국어의 음운표시와 음운과정" (2000), 태학사
- 김경아, "형태음운론적 교체에 대하여", 국어교육, (110), pp.8~200 (2003), 한국어교육학회
- 김영욱, "공형태소에 대하여", 전농어문연구, 9, pp.181~198 (1997), 서울시립대 국문과
- 김영욱, "문법형태의 연구방법 - 중세국어를 중심으로 -" (1997), 박이정
- 김유범, "이형태교체의 조건과 중세국어 이형태교체의 몇 문제", 국어국문학, (149), pp.201~222 (2008), 국어국문학회
- 민현식, "국어 문법 연구" (1999), 역락
- 박재연, "이형태 교체와 관련한 몇 문제", 國語學, (58), pp.129~155 (2010), 국어학회
- 박진호, "통사적 결합 관계와 논항구조", 석사, pp.1994
- 배주채, "국어음운론 개설" (1996), 신구문화사
- 배주채, "‘달라, 다오’의 어휘론", 國語學, (56), pp.191~221 (2009), 국어학회
- 시정곤, "공형태소를 다시 생각함", 한국어학, 12, pp.147~165 (2000), 한국어학회
- 시정곤, "공형태소와 형태 분석에 대하여", 國語學, (57), pp.3~30 (2010), 국어학회
- 이병근, "국어 음운론" (1996), 한국방송대학교출판부
- 이진호, "음운 교체 양상의 변화와 공시론적 기술", 박사, pp.2002
- 이혁화, "교체에 대하여", 형태론, 4(1), pp.59~80 (2002), 형태론
- 이홍식, "교체와 관련된 몇 가지 문제", 성심어문논집, 22, pp.247~227 (2000), 가톨릭대학교 국문과
- 이홍식, "형태소와 문법 기술", 어문학, (109), pp.1~35 (2010), 한국어문학회
- 장윤희, "공형태 분석의 타당성 검토", 형태론, 1(2), pp.227~244 (1999)
- 최명옥, "경북 동해안 방언 연구 - 영덕군 영해면을 중심으로 -" (1980), 영남대학교 민족문화연구소
- 최명옥, "현대 한국어의 공시 형태론 - 경주지역어를 실례로" (2008), 서울대학교출판부