관용어의 고정성과 변이형
A Study on the Fixedness and Variation of Idioms
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze correlations between fixedness and variation in idioms. In idioms, fixedness means figuring out the meaning of each component as a corpus of chunk rather than in a literal sense based on the principle of compositionality when hearing or reading idioms. An idiom is entered as a unit and called and reproduced as a chunk, being similar to a word, which is closely related to the psychological fixedness of idioms. Unlike common words, idioms are monosemic and deictic units rather than polysemic and implicative ones. From the perspective of structural fixedness of idioms, word combinations in idioms are not restricted by the morphosyntaxique or semantic rules and often show irregularities. Since such irregularities can be an important sign of fixedness in idioms, stronger syntactic constraints lead to greater fixedness. In recent studies on idioms, the aforementioned principles of fixedness are applied only to a very limited group of idioms in reality. Keeping those aspects in mind, the present study set out to investigate which syntactic-vocabulary and grammar conditions would be restricted by the fixedness of idioms and demonstrate that the fixedness was not actually absolute and caused relatively many variations through diverse examples.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze correlations between fixedness and variation in idioms. In idioms, fixedness means figuring out the meaning of each component as a corpus of chunk rather than in a literal sense based on the principle of compositionality when hearing or reading idioms. An idiom is entered as a unit and called and reproduced as a chunk, being similar to a word, which is closely related to the psychological fixedness of idioms. Unlike common words, idioms are monosemic and deictic units rather than polysemic and implicative ones. From the perspective of structural fixedness of idioms, word combinations in idioms are not restricted by the morphosyntaxique or semantic rules and often show irregularities. Since such irregularities can be an important sign of fixedness in idioms, stronger syntactic constraints lead to greater fixedness. In recent studies on idioms, the aforementioned principles of fixedness are applied only to a very limited group of idioms in reality. Keeping those aspects in mind, the present study set out to investigate which syntactic-vocabulary and grammar conditions would be restricted by the fixedness of idioms and demonstrate that the fixedness was not actually absolute and caused relatively many variations through diverse examples.
참고문헌 (30)
- 문금현, "국어의 관용어 표현" (1999), 태학사
- 장기성, "성구소의 텍스트 생산 잠재력", 언어과학연구, 1(30), pp.299~320 (2004), 언어과학회
- 장기성, "성구소의 변이형", 언어과학연구, 1(31), pp.247~270 (2004), 언어과학회
- 한만춘, "현대 러시아어 관용구 변이형에 관한 고찰 -동의관계와의 상관성을 중점으로-", 노어노문학, 15(2), pp.213~244 (2003), 한국노어노문학회
- Bravo, N. F. ., "Phraseme und Typisierte Rede" (1999), Stauffenburg Verlag
- Burger, H., "Idiomatik des Deutschen" (1973), Max Niemeyer Verlag
- Burger, H., "Handbuch der Phraseologie" (1982), Walter de Gruyter
- Burger, H., "Normative Aspekte der Phraseologie" (1987), Beiträge zur allgemeinen und germanistischen Phraseologieforschung
- Burger, H., "Zur Konfusion um die Semantischen Merkmale von Phraseologismen", Europhras, 90, pp.13~ (1989)
- Burger, H., "Phraseologie, Eine Einführung am Beispiel des Deutschen" (1998), Erich Schmidt Verlag
- Dobrovolskij, D, "Textbildende Potenzen von Phraseologismen", Linguistische Studien, 164, pp.69~85 (1987)
- Dobrovolskij, D., "Phraseologie als Objekt der Universalienlinguistik" (1988), VER Verlag Enzyklopädie
- Dobrovolskij, D., "Phraseologisch Gebundene Lexikalische Elemente der dt. Gegenwartssprache" (1978), Diss. Karl-Marx-Uni
- Duden-Redewendungen und Sprichwörterlich Redensarten, "Mannheim" (1992), Dudenverlag
- Földes, C, "Deutsche Phraseologie in Sprachsystem und Sprachverwendung" (1992), Ed. Praesens
- Filipec, J, "Die Dialektik von Stabilität und Variabilität", Wiss. Zeitschrift der Karl -Marx Universität H, 5, pp.573~593 (1978)
- Fleischer, W., "Phraseologe der Deutschen Gegenwartssprache" (1997), Max Niemeyer Verlag
- Friederich, W., "Moderne Deutsche Idiomatik" (1976), Max Hueber Verlag
- Häusermann, J., "Phraseologie, Hauptprobleme der Deutschen Phraseologie auf der Basis Sowjetischer Forschungsergebnisse" (1977), Max Niemeyer Verlag
- Hessky, R, "Deutsche Redewendungen" (1997), Gunter Narr Verlag
- Hessky, R., "Phraseologie. Linguistische Grundfragen und kontrastives Modell dt-ungar" (1987), Max Niemeyer Verlag
- Hessky. R., "Deutsche Redeweundungen" (1997), Gunter Narr Verlag
- Koller, W., "Redensarten, Linguistische Aspekte, Vorkommensanalyse, Sprachspiel" (1977), Max Niemeyer Verlag
- Palm, C., "Phraseologie" (1995), Gunter Narr Verlag
- Pilz, K. D., "Phraseologie" (1981), Sammlung Metzler
- Pilz, K. D., "Phraseologie" (1981), Metzler Band
- Sabban, A., "Phraseologie und Übersetzen" (1999), Aisthesis Verlag
- Schemann, H., "Synonymwörterbuch der deutschen Redensarten" (1989), Straelen
- Thun, H.., "Plobleme der Phraseologie. Beihefte zur Zeitschr. f. roman. Philologie. Bd. 168. Tübingen", ~ (1978)
- Wotjak, G., "Übereinzelssprachliches und Einzelsprachspezifisches bei Phraseolexemen", Europhras, 88, pp.469~ (1989)