어휘의 계량 단위 재고-어휘 계량의 언어 간 대조의 관점에서-
Reconsideration on Measuring Unit of Vocabulary : In Terms of Contrastive Perspective of Measuring Vocabulary between Languages
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is to analyse the problem ofmeasuring unit of vocabulary when comparing quantitative characteristicsof vocabulary in terms of contrastive perspective between languages. First of all, previous researches on contrastive analyses of vocabularymeasuring conducted between languages are critically reviewed. Subsequently,the paper analyses how the target and criterion of vocabulary analysiswere set in the existing studies on vocabulary measuring in Korean,Japanese and English. Next, several issues related to measuring vocabularyin language contrastive studies are analysed. The focus is set on establishingmeasuring units for vocabulary researches. The following points havebeen confirmed through the investigation. Firstly, the question whetheror not the functional words are included can significantly influence thetext coverage of high-frequency vocabulary group. Secondly, in case ofKorean and English, when quantitative analyses are conducted inmorphological units, the text coverage of high-frequency vocabulary groupmay be plausible to increase. Therefore, in order to contrast the measuringinvestigation of Korean vocabulary, the investigation results of vocabularyneed to be rearranged by means of the text types and measuring unitsas following. By dividing the frequency of vocabulary depending onthe text types, investigation results of vocabulary can be compared tospecific text types between languages. In addition, setting measuringunits of morphemes should also be conducted while measuring units of words at the same time.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to analyse the problem ofmeasuring unit of vocabulary when comparing quantitative characteristicsof vocabulary in terms of contrastive perspective between languages. First of all, previous researches on contrastive analyses of vocabularymeasuring conducted between languages are critically reviewed. Subsequently,the paper analyses how the target and criterion of vocabulary analysiswere set in the existing studies on vocabulary measuring in Korean,Japanese and English. Next, several issues related to measuring vocabularyin language contrastive studies are analysed. The focus is set on establishingmeasuring units for vocabulary researches. The following points havebeen confirmed through the investigation. Firstly, the question whetheror not the functional words are included can significantly influence thetext coverage of high-frequency vocabulary group. Secondly, in case ofKorean and English, when quantitative analyses are conducted inmorphological units, the text coverage of high-frequency vocabulary groupmay be plausible to increase. Therefore, in order to contrast the measuringinvestigation of Korean vocabulary, the investigation results of vocabularyneed to be rearranged by means of the text types and measuring unitsas following. By dividing the frequency of vocabulary depending onthe text types, investigation results of vocabulary can be compared tospecific text types between languages. In addition, setting measuringunits of morphemes should also be conducted while measuring units of words at the same time.
참고문헌 (31)
- 김광해, "국어 어휘론 개설" (1993), 집문당
- 문영호, "조선어 빈도수 사전" (1993), 과학백과사전종합출판사
- 현대 한국어의 어휘 빈도(상․하), "서상규", 연세대학교 언어정보개발연구원, ~, pp.CLID-WP-98-02-28 (1998)
- 서상규, "말뭉치의 주석과 한국어 기본 어휘 의미 빈도 사전", pp.57~104 (2001), 박이정
- 서상규, "朝鮮語硏究會編, 朝鮮語硏究3" (2006), くろしお出版
- 서상규, "한글의 번수 조사와 외솔 최 현배", 한글, (281), pp.35~72 (2008), 한글학회
- 한국어 교육을 위한 기초 어휘 선정 1-기초 어휘빈도 조사 결과 보고서, "서상규", 문화관광부․한국어세계화추진위원회, ~ (1998)
- 심재기, "국어 어휘론 개설" (2011), 도서출판 지식과 교양
- 임지룡, "국어의 기초어휘에 대한 연구", 국어교육연구, 23(1), pp.87~131 (1991), 국어교육학회
- 현대 국어 사용 빈도 조사-한국어 학습용 어휘 선정을 위한 기초조사, "조남호", 국립국어연구원, ~ (2002)
- 한영균, "한국어 기본어휘 빈도용례사전의 편찬을 위한 기초적 연구", 제6회 양영 학술연구논문집 (1998), 양영회
- 北京語言学院語言教学研究所編, "現代漢語頻率調典" (1986), 北京語言学院出版社
- 国立国語研究所, "現代雑誌九十種の用語用字(1)" (1962), 秀英出版
- 国立国語研究所, "語彙の研究と教育(上)" (1984), 大蔵省印刷局
- 国立国語研究所, "語彙の研究と教育(下)" (1985), 大蔵省印刷局
- 玉村文郎編, "日本語の語彙・意味(上)" (1989), 明治書院
- 玉村文郎編, "日本語の語彙・意味(下)" (1990), 明治書院
- 玉村文郎編, "新しい日本語研究を学ぶ人のために" (1998), 世界思想社
- 玉村文郎, "NAFL 日本語教師養成講座日本語の語彙․意味(１)" (1987), アルク
- 玉村文郎, "日本語語彙の研究", 博士, pp.2002
- 田中章夫, "国語語彙論" (1978), 明治書院
- 南博編, "記憶術―心理学が発見した20のルール" (1961), 光文社
- 中国語学研究会, "中国語学事典" (1957), 江南書院
- Brendan Byrne., "Three Weeks To A Better Memory" (1951), THE JOHN C. WINSTON COMPANY
- Carroll, J. B., "The American Heritage Word Frequency Book" (1971), Houghton Mifflin
- Francis, W. N., "Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar" (1982), Houghton Mifflin
- Nagy, W. E., "How Many Words are There in Printed School English?", Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3), pp.304~330 (1984), Wiley-Blackwell
- Nation, P., "Word Families", International Journal of Lexicography, 6(4), pp.253~279 (1993), Oxford University Press
- Nation, P., "VOCABULARY SIZE, TEXT COVERAGE AND WORD LISTS", pp.6~19 (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Wolf Dieter Ortmann., "Hochfrequente deutsche Wortformen 1, Goethe-Inst., Arbeitsstelle für Wissehschaftliche Didaktik", Projekt Phonothek, ~ (1975)
- В. А. Аграев, "Частотный Словарь Рус Ского Языка: Около 40000 Слов", Русский Язык, ~ (1977)