본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

코퍼스 기법과 이분법적 대립 책략을 활용한 영어 safe(ty)와 secur(-ity) 간의 의미와 용법 구분

Towards a Corpus-Based Distinction in Contextual Uses between Safe(ty) and Secur(-ity) by means of Binary Opposition Strategy

김두식
언어과학회 (The Linguistic Science Society)|2017.12|언어과학연구 (The Journal of Linguistics Science)|제83호|pp. 21-62|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.21296/jls.2017.12.83.21

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

가해자-피해자대립자질맥락적 대립이분법적 대립 책략안전 틀
주제분류언어학

초록

.

Abstract

This study aims to distinguish between safe(ty) and secur(-ity) using corpus-based collocation and ‘Binary Opposition(BO) Strategy’ proposed by Kim (2015). His BO-Strategy was invented for the effective distinction between a pair of lexical/grammatical (near-)synonyms on the basis of the Structuralist concept of binary opposition, defined as the system by which the theoretical opposites are strictly defined and set off against one another. This study demonstrates that safe(ty) and secur(-ity) are distinguished in the context by opposite features, such as [Causative vs. Non-causative], [Harm vs. Victim], [Result vs. Process], and [Direct vs. Indirect], depending on the difference between being safe and making safe, the difference in statuses of frame elements between collocates of safe(ty) and secur(-ity), the difference of putting the focus of safety on either its result or process, and the difference of actions taken in dealing with harm as one of the frame elements, respectively.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 김두식, "영어문법론(Theory of Grammar in English)", pp.111~170 (2009), 종합출판(Seoul:Jonghab Publishing Co.)
  2. 김두식, "BINARY ENGLISH GRAMMAR" (2014), 종합출판
  3. 김두식, "이분법적 대립책략을 이용한 ‘포함’ 동사 사용 구분: Contain vs. Include", 현대영미어문학, 34(4), pp.21~60 (2016), 현대영미어문학회[DOI]
  4. 김두식, "인지언어학" (2010), 박이정
  5. 심지영, "코퍼스를 기반으로 한 begin과 start의 의미와 연어 비교", 신영어영문학, (49), pp.227~252 (2011), 신영어영문학회
  6. 안병길, "이분법적 대립관계의 RISK와 DANGER", 현대영미어문학, 33(1), pp.27~52 (2015), 현대영미어문학회
  7. Boholm, Max, "The Semantic Distinction between ‘Risk’ and ‘Danger’: A Linguistic Analysis", Risk Analysis, 32(2), pp.281~293 (2012)
  8. Burns, Alan, "On the Meaning of Safety and Security", The Computer Journal, 25(1), pp.3~15 (1992)
  9. Adam Crafer, "A Corpus Investigation of the Similarities and Differences between think about and think of", 언어, 39(2), pp.337~354 (2014), 한국언어학회
  10. Dixon, Robert M. W., "A New Approach to English Grammar, on Semantic Principles" (1991), Clarendon Press
  11. Dixon, Robert M. W., "A Semantic Approach to English Grammar" (2005), Oxford University Press
  12. Edmonds, Philip, "Near-Synonymy and Lexical Choice", Computational Linguistics, 28(2), pp.105~144 (2002)
  13. Fellbaum, Christiane, "Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics", pp.665~670 (2005), Elsevier
  14. Fillmore, Charles J., "Universals in Linguistic Theory", pp.1~88 (1968), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  15. Fillmore, Charles J, "The Need for Frame Semantics within Linguistics", Statistical Methods in Linguistics, 12, pp.5~29 (1976)
  16. Fillmore, Charles J., "Linguistics in the Morning Calm", pp.111~137 (1982), Hanshin Publishing Co
  17. Fillmore, Charles J., "The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis", pp.313~340 (2010), Oxford University Press
  18. Fillmore, Charles J., "Frames, Fields, and Contrast: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organisation", pp.75~102 (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
  19. Firth, John Rupert, "Papers in Linguistics 1934-1951" (1957), Oxford University Press
  20. Freed, Alice F., "The Semantics of English Aspectual Complementation" (1979), D. Reidel
  21. Goffman, Erving, "Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience" (1974), Harper and Row
  22. Haspelmath, Martin, "Causatives and Transitivity", pp.87~120 (1993), John Benjamins
  23. Hill, Jimmie, "Teaching Collocation: Further Developments in the Lexical Approach", pp.47~69 (2000), Language Teaching Publications
  24. Hinchey, Mike, "Evolving Critical Systems: A Research Agenda for Computer-Based Systems", Proceedings of 2010 17th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, pp.430~434 (2010)
  25. Kim, Doo-Shick, "Contextual Opposition Effect and the Distinction between Confusingly Similar Pairs of Words or Phrases", Proceedings of the 2015 Fall Joint Conference of DISCOG and KACL, pp.87~97 (2015)
  26. Kim, Doo-Shick, "An Overview of the BO-Based Approach to the Studies of Lexical", Grammatical Synonyms, 2016, 187~200
  27. Langacker, Ronald W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1 (Theoretical Prerequisites)" (1987), Stanford University Press
  28. Levin, Beth, "영어동사 부류와 교체현상" (2005), 한국문화사
  29. Miller, George A., "Introduction to WordNet: An On-Line Lexical Database", International Journal of Lexicography (special issue), 3(4), pp.235~312 (1990)
  30. Minsky, Marvin, "The Psychology of Computer Vision", pp.211~277 (1975), McGraw-Hill
  31. O'Keeffe, Anne, "From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Language Teaching" (2007), Cambridge University Press
  32. Quirk, Randolph, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
  33. Radden, Günter, "Cognitive English Grammar" (2007), John Benjamins
  34. Rumelhart, David E., "Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science", pp.211~236 (1975), Academic Press
  35. Saussure, Ferdinand de, "Course in General Linguistics", McGraw-Hill
  36. Schank, Roger C., "Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding" (1977), Lawrence Erlbaum
  37. Sun, Koun-Tem, "A WordNet-Based Near-Synonyms and Similar-Looking Word Learning System", Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), pp.121~134 (2011)
  38. Talmy, Leonard, "Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol.1" (2000), MIT Press
  39. Tannen, Deborah, "New Directions in Discourse Processing", pp.137~181 (1979), Ablex
  40. Thornbury, Scott, "How to Teach Grammar" (1999), Pearson Education Limited
  41. Xio, Richard Z., "Collocation, Semantic Prosody and Near Synonymy: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective", Applied Linguistics, 27(1), pp.103~129 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이분법적 대립을 이용한 영어 유의어의 구분: Afraid to V vs. Afraid of V-ing김두식, 안병길, 진용우한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2018 · 제25권 제1호‘질병’관련 유의어의 용법비교: 이분법적 대립책략을 이용하여안병길한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2019 · 제26권 제4호유의어 find와 seek의 의미 및 용례의 유사점과 차이점에 관한 코퍼스기반 연구하명호새한영어영문학회 · 새한영어영문학2016 · 제58권 제3호A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Near-Synonyms Safety and Security in Maritime English장세은, Wenyu Lu언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2017 · 제83호코퍼스를 이용한 유의어기술의 방법에 관한 연구 －人名詞의 사회문화적 의미분석을 중심으로－강경완한국일본언어문화학회 · 일본언어문화2017 · 제38호Using Corpora to Help Teach Difficult-to-distinguish English WordsDilin Liu한국영어교육학회 · 영어교육2013 · 제68권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)

고대영어의 물주구문에서 주어구문으로의 변화에 대한 국면분석김대익pp. 1-20대학생 학습공동체의 팀 상호작용 역량강화김홍자pp. 63-87A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Near-Synonyms Safety and Security in Maritime English장세은, Wenyu Lupp. 89-113전경-배경의 의미 전이 현상에 관한 연구박미경pp. 115-134On the Island-(In)Sensitivity in the Right-Dislocation Construction in Korean오세랑, 박범식pp. 135-153
원문 보기