본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Principled Explanation on the Quantifier Scope Phenomena

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The purpose of this study is to present a principled explanatory alternative mechanism for the scope puzzling phenomena in the quantifier constructions. For this, Multiple Agree (Chomsky 2001; Hiraiwa 2000), Phase (Chomsky 1998, 1999), Phase higher evaluation (Chomsky 1999), Feature-inheritance from Phase (Chomsky 2005, 2013, 2014), INT (Chomsky 1999, 2001) and semantic Duality of the Interface (Boeckx 2008; Chomsky 2005; Grohmann 2003; Kim 2018) are adopted. In addition, [±D]-feature is posited on the basis of the interpretation of θ–domain. By using this system, the DOC construction, the counterexample to Hornstein’s (1995, 1999) A-movement for Case-checking account, the counterexample to Fox’s (1995, 2000) Scope Economy account, and the bi-clausal quantifier sentence are solved. Not only that, the c-command and Fox’s (2000) Revised Modularity Hypothesis are also explained in a natural manner. (Keimyung University)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present a principled explanatory alternative mechanism for the scope puzzling phenomena in the quantifier constructions. For this, Multiple Agree (Chomsky 2001; Hiraiwa 2000), Phase (Chomsky 1998, 1999), Phase higher evaluation (Chomsky 1999), Feature-inheritance from Phase (Chomsky 2005, 2013, 2014), INT (Chomsky 1999, 2001) and semantic Duality of the Interface (Boeckx 2008; Chomsky 2005; Grohmann 2003; Kim 2018) are adopted. In addition, [±D]-feature is posited on the basis of the interpretation of θ–domain. By using this system, the DOC construction, the counterexample to Hornstein’s (1995, 1999) A-movement for Case-checking account, the counterexample to Fox’s (1995, 2000) Scope Economy account, and the bi-clausal quantifier sentence are solved. Not only that, the c-command and Fox’s (2000) Revised Modularity Hypothesis are also explained in a natural manner. (Keimyung University)

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Aoun, Joseph, "Quantifier Types", Linguistic Inquiry, 16, pp.623~636 (1985)
  2. Aoun, Joseph, "Scope and Constituency", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.141~172 (1989)
  3. Aoun, Joseph, "Syntax of Scope" (1993), MIT Press
  4. Beghelli, Filippo, "A Minimalist Approach to Quantifier Scope", NELS, 23, pp.65~80 (1993)
  5. Boeckx, Cedric, "Bare Syntax" (2008), Oxford University Press
  6. Carnie, Andrew, "Syntax: A Generative Introduction" (2002), Blackwell
  7. Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
  8. Chomsky, Noam, "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
  9. Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  10. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework, "Chomsky, Noam", MIT, ~ (1998)
  11. Chomsky, Noam, "Derivation by Phase", MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 18, pp.1~44 (1999)
  12. Beyond Explanatory Adequacy, "Chomsky, Noam", MIT, ~ (2001)
  13. On Phases, "Chomsky, Noam", MIT, ~ (2005)
  14. Chomsky, Noam, "Problems of Projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
  15. Problems of Projection: Extensions, "Chomsky, Noam", MIT, ~ (2014)
  16. Fox, Danny, "Economy and scope", Natural Language Semantics, 3(3), pp.283~341 (1995)
  17. Fox, Danny, "Economy and Semantic Interpretation" (2000), MIT
  18. Grohmann, Kleanthes K., "Prolific Peripheries" (2003), John Benjamins
  19. Heim, Irene, "Semantics in Generative Grammar" (1998), Blackwell
  20. Hiraiwa, Ken, "Multiple Agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint in Japanese", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 40, pp.67~80 (2000)
  21. Hornstein, Norbert, "Logical Form: From GB to Minimalism" (1995), Blackwell
  22. Hornstein, Norbert, "Working Minimalism", pp.45~75 (1999), MIT
  23. 김희태, "A Principled Explanation for Verb-Movements: V-v-to-T and T-to-C", 현대문법연구, (98), pp.71~95 (2018), 현대문법학회[DOI]
  24. Larson, Richard K., "On the Double Object Construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), pp.335~391 (1988)
  25. May, Robert, "The Grammar of Quantification", Ph.D., pp.1977
  26. May, Robert, "Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation" (1985), MIT Press
  27. Pesetsky, David, "Paths and Categories", Ph.D., pp.1982
  28. Radford, Andrew, "Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English" (2004), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (27건)