Scope Rigidity and Scope Ambiguity in Korean
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to account for scope rigidity and ambiguity in Korean quantifiers. It has been much discussed that scope reconstruction makes a contribution to scope ambiguity in Korean and other languages. While scope reconstruction applies to constructions involving A'-movement, it is proposed that QR applies to constructions involving A-movement such as A-scrambling, raisings, passives, unaccusatives, psych-verbs and unergatives. This analysis crucially depends on three hypotheses: (i) both VP and vP are phases in Korean following Ko (2004, 2005) and Ha (2008), (ii) A-moved elements do not reconstruct in general while A'-moved elements may reconstruct (Chomsky 1995, Boeckx 2001), and (iii) Scope Economy is observed by Quantifier Raising (QR) (Fox 1995, 2000). The contrast between English-type languages and Korean-type languages with regard to scope is uniformly accounted for based on the cross-linguistic availability of QR, reconstruction (im)possibility, Scope Economy, and parameterized phasehood of vP and VP.
Abstract
This paper aims to account for scope rigidity and ambiguity in Korean quantifiers. It has been much discussed that scope reconstruction makes a contribution to scope ambiguity in Korean and other languages. While scope reconstruction applies to constructions involving A'-movement, it is proposed that QR applies to constructions involving A-movement such as A-scrambling, raisings, passives, unaccusatives, psych-verbs and unergatives. This analysis crucially depends on three hypotheses: (i) both VP and vP are phases in Korean following Ko (2004, 2005) and Ha (2008), (ii) A-moved elements do not reconstruct in general while A'-moved elements may reconstruct (Chomsky 1995, Boeckx 2001), and (iii) Scope Economy is observed by Quantifier Raising (QR) (Fox 1995, 2000). The contrast between English-type languages and Korean-type languages with regard to scope is uniformly accounted for based on the cross-linguistic availability of QR, reconstruction (im)possibility, Scope Economy, and parameterized phasehood of vP and VP.
참고문헌 (36)
- Ahn,Sung-Ho, "Korean quantification and universal grammar", 박사, pp.1990
- Aoun, Joseph, "Scope and constituency", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.141~172 (1989)
- Aoun, Joseph, "Syntax of scope", MIT, ~ (1993)
- Belletti, Adriana, "Psych-verbs and theta-theory", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, pp.291~352 (1988)
- Boeckx,Cedric, "Scope reconstruction and A-movement", Natural language and Linguistic Theory, 19, pp.503~548 (2001)
- Bošković, Željko, "Scrambling and Last Resort,Linguistic Inquiry,29:347-366", Linguistic Inquiry, 29, pp.347~366 (1998)
- Chomsky,Noam, "The minimalist program", MIT, ~ (1995)
- Chomsky,Noam, "On phases. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory" (2008), MIT Press
- Fox,Danny, "Economy and scope", Natural Language Semantics, 3, pp.283~341 (1995)
- Fox,Danny, "Economy and semantic interpretation", MIT, ~ (2000)
- Fox, Danny, "Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. In Object shift, special issue", Theoretical Linguistics, 31, pp.1~46 (2005)
- The VP spell-out domains and scope rigidity, "Ha,Seungwan", Tronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 57~70, pp.28 (2008)
- Heim, Irena, "Semantics in generative grammar" (1998), Blackwell
- Hoji,Hajime, "Logical form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese", 박사, pp.1985
- Hong,Soo-min, "Exceptional Case-marking and resultative constructions", 박사, pp.2005
- Hornstein,Nobert, "An argument for minimalism: The case of antecedent contained deletion", Linguistic Inquiry, 25, pp.455~480 (1994)
- Hornstein,Nobert, "Logical form" (1995), Blackwell
- Huang,James, "Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar", 박사, pp.1982
- Johnson,Kyle, "How far will quantifiers go? In Step by step: essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", MIT, 187~210 (2000)
- Johnson, Kyle, "Lowering and mid-size clauses", In Proceedings of the 1997 Tubingen workshop on reconstruction, pp.185~206 (1997)
- Kennedy,C, "Antecedent contained deletion and the syntax of quantifiers", Linguistic Inquiry, 28, pp.662~688 (1997)
- Kim, Young-joo, "Scope interpretation and the syntax of psych-verbs", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.681~688 (1989)
- Ko,Heejeong, "Asymmetry in scrambling and cyclic linearization", MIT, ~ (2004)
- Ko,Heejeong, "Syntactic edges and linearization", 박사, pp.2005
- Koizumi,Masatoshi, "Phrase structure in minimalist syntax", 박사, pp.1995
- Larson,Richard, "On the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.335~391 (1988)
- Lasnik,Howard, "Chains of arguments. In Working minimalism", MIT, 189~215 (1999)
- 이혜란, "A Study on Scrambling in Korean: The Minimalist Approach", 생성문법연구, 16(3), pp.425~460 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
- Miyagawa,Shigeru, "The EPP, Scrambling, and wh-in-situ in Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.293~338 (2001), MIT Press
- Nevins, Andrew, "Some AGREEment matters", In Proceedings of WCCFL 22, 370~383 (2003)
- Bak,Jung-Sup, "Twisekkiwa yanghwasauy cakyongyek", Studies in Generative Grammar, 9, pp.229~265 (1999)
- Saito,Mamoru, "Long-distance scrambling in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.69~118 (1992)
- Saito,Mamoru, "A derivational approach to the interpretation of scrambling chains", Lingua, 113, pp.482~518 (2003)
- Sohn,Keun-Won, "Negative polarity items, scope and economy", 박사, pp.1995
- 손근원, "Scope taking and the negative barrier", 언어연구, 23(4), pp.701~721 (2008), 한국현대언어학회
- JinheeSuh, "Non-QR Analysis for Scope Interaction in Korean and English:An approach in the ＂Probe-Goal＂ System", 언어, 27(4), pp.601~616 (2002), 한국언어학회