The Rhetorical Adjunct Wh mwue(-l) ‘what’ in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The word but (for) representing the meanings of exception is often regarded as a preposition by English-English and English-Korean dictionaries. However, the exceptional but occurs in the constructions which take all kinds of components after that. According to a traditional perspective, this construction is regarded as ungrammatical. This paper examines the grammatical status of but with the meaning and function and the revised E/S/P conditions proposed by Ahn and Kim (2013), which certify the felicitous use of the correlative conjunction except. The findings show that but can be divided into but1, which satisfies the conditions, and but2, but3, and but4, which violate them. Therefore, but1 functions as a correlative conjunction, but2 as a preposition, but3 as an adverb and but4 as a coordinate conjunction. But for can also be divided into but for1, but for2, and but for3 depending on their functions and meanings. All of them violate the revised E/S/P conditions.
Abstract
The word but (for) representing the meanings of exception is often regarded as a preposition by English-English and English-Korean dictionaries. However, the exceptional but occurs in the constructions which take all kinds of components after that. According to a traditional perspective, this construction is regarded as ungrammatical. This paper examines the grammatical status of but with the meaning and function and the revised E/S/P conditions proposed by Ahn and Kim (2013), which certify the felicitous use of the correlative conjunction except. The findings show that but can be divided into but1, which satisfies the conditions, and but2, but3, and but4, which violate them. Therefore, but1 functions as a correlative conjunction, but2 as a preposition, but3 as an adverb and but4 as a coordinate conjunction. But for can also be divided into but for1, but for2, and but for3 depending on their functions and meanings. All of them violate the revised E/S/P conditions.
참고문헌 (24)
- "Our Speech Fountain Dictionary (Wulimalsaym Sacen)"[URL]
- Ahn, Miyeon, "The Prosody of Wh- and Rhetorical Questoins in Korean", Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 26(3)
- Biezma, Maria, "Rhetorical Questions: Severing Asking from Questioning", Proceedings of SALT, 27, pp.302~322 (2017)
- Caponigro, Ivano, "Rhetorical Questions as Questions", Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 11, pp.121~133
- Collins, Chris, "‘Why’ and ‘How’ Come", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, pp.31~45 (1991)
- Hamblin, Charles L., "Questions in Montague English", Foundations of Language, 10, pp.41~53 (1973)
- Hehl, Verena, "Who Would Claim That Multiple Rhetorical Wh-Questions Are Real?", A talk delivered at the MIT Summer Talk Series, ~ (2020)
- Karttunen, Lauri, "Syntax and Semantics of Questions", Linguistics and Philosophy, 1(1), pp.3~44 (1977)
- Karttunen, Lauri, "Syntax and Semantics, vol. 11 (Presupposition)", pp.1~56 (1979), Academic Press
- Kurafuji, Takeo, "Unambiguous Checking", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 29, pp.81~96 (1996)
- Kurafuji, Takeo, "Case Checking of Accusative Wh-Adjuncts", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics WPL, 31, pp.253~271 (1997)
- Cheung, Yam-Leung, "The Negative Wh-Construction", Ph. D., pp.2008
- Han, Cung-hye, "Interpreting Interrogatives as Rhetorical Question", Lingua, 112, pp.201~229 (2002)
- Nakao, Chizuru, "When ‘what’ Means ‘why’: On Accusative Wh-Adjuncts in Japanese", University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, pp.153~161 (2009)
- Ochi, Masao, "Constraints on Feature Checking", Ph.D., pp.1999
- Ochi, Masao, "'How Come’ and Other Adjunct Wh-Phrases: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective", Language and Linguistics, 5(1), pp.29~57 (2004)
- Ochi, Masao, "The Syntax of Adjunct Wh-NPs", University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 6(1), pp.22~ (1999)
- Potts, Christopher, "The Logic of Conventional Implicatures" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Potts, Christopher, "The Expressive Dimension", Theoretical Linguistics, 33(2), pp.165~198 (2007)
- Potts, Christopher, "The Centrality of Expressive Indices: Reply to the Commentaries", Theoretical Linguistics, 33(2), pp.255~268 (2007)
- Stalnaker, Robert, "Pragmatics", Synthese, 22, pp.1~2 (1970)
- Stalnaker, Robert, "Context. (Context and Content)" (2014), Oxford University Press
- Tsai, W. -T. Dylan, "Left Periphery and ‘how-why’ Alternations", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 17, pp.83~115 (2008)
- Yang, Muyi, "On the Discourse Dynamics of Exceptional What-Questions", Proceedings of GLOW in Asia 2019, 2019, pp.255~274 (2019)