본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

헌신형 인적자원관리 구성요소의 도입 유형에 따른 기업성과의 차이 연구

The Relationship Between The Adoption Of High Commitment HRM System And Firm Performances

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

본 연구에서는 인적자원관리제도, 인적자원관리제도들의 묶음으로서 역량, 헌신, 기회의 세 가지 구성요소가 잘 갖추어진 구성형태로서 헌신형 인적자원관리 시스템이라는 연구 틀에 따라 각 구성요소 및 구성요소의 균형도입이 기업성과에 어떠한 영향을 미치는가를 살펴보았다. 본 연구에서는 첫째, 헌신형 인적자원관리 구성요소 도입이 기업성과를 높이고 둘째, 헌신형 인적자원관리 구성요소의 균형도입형, 불균형도입형, 저도입형의 순서대로 기업성과가 높을 것이라는 가설을 설정하였다. 분석 결과, 헌신형 인적자원관리 시스템에 포함된 헌신, 역량, 기회 구성요소는 모두 기업성과에 대하여 정(+)의 관련성이 나타나고 있다. 또한 헌신, 역량, 기회 세 가지 구성요소가 모두 균형 있게 도입된 균형도입형, 역량 관련제도 도입이 미흡한 불균형도입형, 모든 제도 도입이 미흡한 저도입형으로 분류할 수 있었고 기업성과는 균형도입형, 불균형도입형, 저도입형 순으로 높은 것으로 나타나고 있다. 본 연구는 의의는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 헌신형 인적자원관리의 구성요소들과 기업성과 간에는 유의한 정(+)의 관계가 존재하며, 헌신형 인적자원관리제도를 구성하는 요소들의 균형 도입을 통한 내적 적합성 향상이 기업성과 제고와 정(+)의 관련성을 가지고 있다는 점을 확인했다. 둘째, 헌신형 인적자원관리 시스템의 구성요소 및 균형 도입이 인적자원관리 성과, 조직성과, 재무성과 등의 전반적 기업성과에 효과성이 있음을 실증적으로 보여주었다.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of balanced adoption of three elements of competence, commitment, and opportunity on the firm performance. The research frame of this study is that high commitment HRM system as a bundles of various HRM systems comprises of those three elements of competence, commitment, and chance of participation. This study firstly set up a hypothesis of that the adoption of high commitment HRM systems would increase firm performance. Secondly, it hypothesizes that high commitment HRM system differs by the level of balances of the adoption of those three elements. When the balance of the adoption of those elements reaches optimal level, firm performance would be highest. On the other hand, when the adoption of the three elements lacks balance, the firm performance would be lower than the optimal balance level. Firm performance would be lowest for those which lacks in introduction of the three elements. The empirical result showed that commitment, competence, and chance of participation had positive relations to firm performance. High commitment HRM system has been classified according to the introduction of those three elements, and the three types of the system were identified. The first type was the system with balanced adoption of the three elements. The second type was the system with the adoption of only the two elements, commitment and chance of participation. The third type was identified as the system with the introduction of non of the three elements. The firm performance differ by each system. The first type was highest in firm performance. The second type was lower than the first type but higher than the third type. Lowest was the third type. This study was meaningful in that firstly, the empirical results confirms the views of universal approaches on the HRM system than the contingency approaches. The balanced adoption of HRM elements showed positive relations but moderation effects by those variables representing contingency views were not significant. Secondly, improvement of internal fits with balanced adoption of those elements of high commitment HRM system showed positive relations to firm performance. Thirdly, this study investigated the impact of high commitment HRM system and types of introduction not only on those of HRM performance, but also on those industrial relations performance, organizational performance, and financial performance. The empirical results showed that elements of high commitment HRM system and different types in adoption of those elements showed universal impact on both HRM performance and general firm performance.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 김동배, "참여적 작업시스템과 성과: 작업조직과 인사관리의 정합성을 중심으로", 인사관리연구, 25(1), pp.199~226 (2001)
  2. 김동배, "인사관리시스템의 선행요인에 대한 탐색적 연구: 사무관리직을 중심으로", 노동정책연구, 3(3), pp.111~133 (2003)
  3. 김동배, "조직상황, 인사관리 시스템, 조직성과에 관한 연구", 인사·조직연구, 9(2), pp.249~279 (2001)
  4. 김동원, "한국 우량기업의 노사관계 DNA" (2008), 박영사
  5. 김윤호, "인적자원관리 시스템 유형분류와 유형별 조직성과의 차이", 경영학연구, 38(3), pp.737~771 (2009), 한국경영학회
  6. 김재구, "인사관리시스템과 경영성과가 상호간에 미치는영향에 대한 연구-제조업 생산직을 중심으로", 조직과 인사관리연구, 27(3), pp.31~54 (2003), 한국인사관리학회
  7. 무노조기업의 인사관리 현황, In 무노조기업의 고용관계-노사협의회와 대안적 근로자대표기구를 중심으로, "노용진", 한국노동연구원, 64~96 (2007)
  8. 배종석, "경쟁우위와 인적자원관리: 전략적 인적자원관리 연구의 비판적 고찰과 연구방향모색", 인사조직연구, 7(2), pp.1~45 (1999)
  9. 배종석, "인적자원관리와 기업성과: 비판적 고찰과 한국기업 적용과제", 인사관리연구, 25(3), pp.1~31 (2001)
  10. 배종석, "사람기반 경쟁우위를 위한 인적자원론" (2008), 홍문사
  11. 배종석, "인적자원관리와 조직성과에 대한 실증연구", 인사·조직연구, 11(2), pp.133~169 (2003), 한국인사·조직학회
  12. 양수경, "사업체 재무정보 조사방법 비교", 노동리뷰, 35, pp.86~96 (2007)
  13. 채서일, "사회과학조사방법론, 제3판" (2008), 비엔엠북스
  14. 최장호, "고성과 작업 시스템의 내적 적합성과 상황 적합성에 관한 연구", 경영학연구, 39(3), pp.577~593 (2010), 한국경영학회
  15. Arthur, J. B, "The link between business strategy and industrial relations in American steel mills", Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45(3), pp.488~506 (1992)
  16. Arthur, J. B, "Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover", Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp.670~687 (1994)
  17. Supporting Workplace Learning For High Performance Working, "Ashton, D", ILO, ~ (2002)
  18. Barney, J, "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage", Journal of Management, 17(1), pp.99~120 (1991)
  19. Baron, J. N, "Strategic Human Resources" (1999), John Wiley Inc
  20. Becker, B. E, "The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects", Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), pp.779~801 (1996)
  21. Becker, B, "High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications", Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, pp.53~101 (1998)
  22. Bowen, D. E, "Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system", Academy of Management Review, 29(2), pp.203~221 (2004)
  23. Delery, J. E, "Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Test of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions", Academy of Management Journal, 39, pp.802~835 (1996)
  24. Dreher, G. F, "Human resource strategy: A behavioral perspective for the general manager" (2002), McGraw-Hill
  25. Dyer, L, "Human resource strategies and firm performance: what do we know and where do we need to go", International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(3), pp.656~670 (1995)
  26. Jackson, S, "Understanding Human Resource Management in the Context of Organizations and Their Environments", Annual Review of Psychology, 46, pp.237~264 (1995)
  27. Ketchen, D.J, "The Application of Cluster Analysis in Strategic Management Research", Strategic Management Journal, 14(6), pp.441~458 (1996)
  28. Lado, A. A, "Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective", Academy of Management Review, 19, pp.699~727 (1994)
  29. MacDuffie, J. P, "Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry", Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2), pp.197~221 (1995)
  30. Pfeffer, J, "The human equation: Building profits by putting people first" (1998), Harvard Business School Press
  31. Wall, T, "On the validity of subjective measures of company performance", Personnel Psychology, 57(1), pp.95~118 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)