시선처리분석으로 본 한국어(L1)-영어(L2) 여격구문 문장처리 양상 비교
An eye-tracking approach to dative structure sentence processing in Korean (L1) and English (L2)
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates how Korean native speakers learning English process two types of dative structures in Korean (L1) and English (L2), utilizing an eye-tracking approach. A total of 35 participants engaged in the experiment, focusing on Korean's canonical order [DAT-ACC] and scrambled order [ACC-DAT], as well as English's double object and prepositional dative structures. Eye-tracking data across four areas of interest (AOIs) - subject, verb, dative noun, and accusative noun - were analyzed. The results indicated significant differences in the accusative noun area in Korean, with fewer fixations and regressions in the DAT-ACC structure compared to ACC-DAT, implying reduced cognitive effort. In contrast, in English, the dative noun area was critical, with prepositional dative structures showing fewer cognitive efforts, evidenced by reduced fixation counts, regressions, and reading times compared to double object dative structures.
Abstract
This study investigates how Korean native speakers learning English process two types of dative structures in Korean (L1) and English (L2), utilizing an eye-tracking approach. A total of 35 participants engaged in the experiment, focusing on Korean's canonical order [DAT-ACC] and scrambled order [ACC-DAT], as well as English's double object and prepositional dative structures. Eye-tracking data across four areas of interest (AOIs) - subject, verb, dative noun, and accusative noun - were analyzed. The results indicated significant differences in the accusative noun area in Korean, with fewer fixations and regressions in the DAT-ACC structure compared to ACC-DAT, implying reduced cognitive effort. In contrast, in English, the dative noun area was critical, with prepositional dative structures showing fewer cognitive efforts, evidenced by reduced fixation counts, regressions, and reading times compared to double object dative structures.
참고문헌 (16)
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2018), 집문당
- 김성아, "한국인 영어 학습자의 관계절 중의성 해결- 안구추적 기반 -", 언어학 연구, (45), pp.199~218 (2017), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- 박분주, "시선추적을 통해 살펴본 대학생 영어학습자들의 복합명사구 수식절 문장처리", 현대문법연구, (108), pp.143~162 (2020), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- 박분주, "주어-동사 일치 문장처리에 관한 시선추적 연구", 현대문법연구, (112), pp.251~273 (2021), 현대문법학회
- 이미선, "안구이동추적을 통해 살펴본 관계절의 통사처리 과정", 인지과학, 20(4), pp.507~533 (2009), 한국인지과학회[DOI]
- Choi, H. W., "Length and order : A corpus study of Korean dative accusative construction", Discourse and Cognition, 14(3), pp.207~272 (2007)
- Castelhano, M. S., "Cognitive and cultural influence on eye moverments", pp.3~33 (2008), Tianjin People’s Publishing House
- Conklin, K., "Using eye-tracking in applied linguistics and second language research", Second Language Research, 32, pp.453~467 (2016)
- Conklin, K., "Eye-tracking: A guide for applied linguistics research" (2018), Cambridge University Press
- 정세훈, "The Role of L1 and Degrees of L2 Exposure on Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in L2 Processing", 외국어교육연구, 32(1), pp.45~78 (2018), 외국어교육연구소[DOI]
- 김은아, "Integration of Verb Subcategorization Information in L2 English Sentence Processing by Korean Learners: An Eye-Tracking Study", 언어정보, (29), pp.05~25 (2019), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- Park, B. -J., "Structure persistence in L1 and L2 production of English dative structure", The Journal of Linguistic Science, 46, pp.127~143 (2008)
- Park, B. -J., "The sentence processing of learners of Chinese : Focusing on dative structure", Studies in Modern Grammar, 71, pp.133~150 (2013)
- Park, B. -J., "Syntactic priming effects on sentence production time in Korean(L1)and English(L2)", Studies in Modern Grammar, 84, pp.89~113 (2015)
- Pickering, M., "On-line study of sentence comprehension: Eye-tracking, ERPs and beyond", pp.33~50 (2004), Psychology Press
- Rayner, K., "The psychology of reading" (2012), Psychology Press