The impact of task type on the role of written feedback in noticing: A focus on model and reformulation
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to examine the benefits of reformulation and model texts in promoting second language (L2) writers' noticing across task types. A total of 39 Korean students at a university were randomly assigned into two groups: the picture-description group and the essay-writing group. They were asked to report the problematic features noticed (PFNs) they encountered in the first stage of draft-writing. In the second stage, they compared their drafts with the two feedback methods and then reported potential solutions to PFNs from the two feedback methods. Finally, they were encouraged to identify new PFNs from the two feedback methods during the comparison stage. The findings showed that the two feedback methods made complementary contributions to noticing problems and finding solutions in two writing tasks.
Abstract
This study aims to examine the benefits of reformulation and model texts in promoting second language (L2) writers' noticing across task types. A total of 39 Korean students at a university were randomly assigned into two groups: the picture-description group and the essay-writing group. They were asked to report the problematic features noticed (PFNs) they encountered in the first stage of draft-writing. In the second stage, they compared their drafts with the two feedback methods and then reported potential solutions to PFNs from the two feedback methods. Finally, they were encouraged to identify new PFNs from the two feedback methods during the comparison stage. The findings showed that the two feedback methods made complementary contributions to noticing problems and finding solutions in two writing tasks.
참고문헌 (35)
- Cánovas Guirao, J., "The use of models as a written feedback technique with young EFL learners", System, 52, pp.63~77 (2015)
- Cao, Z., "Studies on positive evidence feedback in second language writing : Status quo and implications", RELC Journal, 0 (2022)[DOI]
- Cohen, A. D., "Reformulating composition", TESOL Newsletter, 17(1), pp.1~5 (1983)
- Coyle, Y., "Exploring the role played by error correction and models on children’s reported noticing and output production in an L2writing task", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3), pp.451~485 (2014)
- Coyle, Y., "Improving reference cohesion in young EFL learners’ collaboratively written narratives: Is there a role for reformulation?", System, 94, pp.102333~ (2020)
- Ferris, D. R., "Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA : Intersections and practical applications", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), pp.181~201 (2010)
- García Mayo, M. del P., "The use of models as written corrective feedback in English as a foreign language(EFL)writing", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, pp.110~127 (2017)
- Hanaoka, O., "Noticing and uptake : Addressing pre-articulated covert problems in L2 writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), pp.332~347 (2012)
- Izumi, S., "Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition?", TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), pp.239~278 (2000)
- Kang, E. Y., "Using model texts as a form of feedback in L2 writing", System, 89, pp.102196~ (2020)[DOI]
- Leki, I., "Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.57~68 (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Levenston, E. A., "Error analysis of free comparison : The theory and the practice", Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), pp.1~11 (1978)
- Li, S., "The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA : A meta-analysis", Language Learning, 60(2), pp.309~365 (2010)
- Li, S., "Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System", System, 84, pp.93~109 (2019)
- Long, M. H., "Handbook of language acquisition, volume 2: Second language acquisition", pp.413~468 (1996), Academic Press
- Loewen, S., "Interaction and instructed second language acquisition", Language Teaching, 51(3), pp.285~329 (2018)
- Mackey, A., "Input, interaction, and second language development : An empirical study of question formation in ESL", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), pp.557~587 (1999)
- Manchón, R. M, "Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language", pp.159~179 (2011), John Benjamins
- Mujtaba, S. M., "Individual and collaborative processing of written corrective feedback affects second language writing accuracy and revision", Assessing Writing, 50, pp.100566~ (2021)
- Polio, C., "The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, pp.375~389 (2012)
- Révész, A., "Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(3), pp.437~470 (2009)
- Robinson, P., "Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production : Exploring interactions in a componential framework", Applied Linguistics, 22(1), pp.27~57 (2001)
- Robinson, P., "The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning", Second Language Studies, 21(2), pp.45~105 (2003)
- Rummel, S., "The effectiveness of written corrective feedback and the impact LAO learners’ beliefs have on uptake", Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 38(1), pp.64~82 (2015)
- Sachs, R., "Learners’ uses of two types of written feedback on an L2 writing revision task", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, pp.67~100 (2007)
- Santos, M., "The differential effect of two types of direct written corrective feedback on noticing and uptake:Reformulation vs. error correction", International Journal of English Studies, 10, pp.131~154 (2010)
- Schmidt, R., "The role of consciousness in second language learning", Applied Linguistics, 11(2), pp.129~158 (1990)
- Schmidt, R., "Awareness and second language acquisition", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, pp.206~226 (1992)
- Song, M., "The effect of output task type on noticing and learning of the English past counterfactual conditional", System, 36, pp.295~312 (2008)
- Storch, N., "Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, pp.303~334 (2010)
- Swain, M., "The output hypothesis : Just speaking and writing aren’t enough", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(1), pp.158~164 (1993)
- Swain, M., "Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate : A step towards second language learning", Applied Linguistics, 16(3), pp.371~389 (1995)
- Swain, M., "Encyclopedia of applied linguistics", pp.1~8 (2012), Blackwell
- Yang, L., "Exploring the role of reformulations and a model text in EFL students’ writing performance", Language Teaching Research, 14(4), pp.464~484 (2010)
- Yoon, H. -J., "Challenging the connection between task perceptions and language use in L2 writing : Genre, cognitive task complexity, and linguistic complexity", Journal of Second Language Writing, 54, pp.100857~ (2021)
