본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 추측 증거성의 행위주 인칭 제약

An analysis of agent person restrictions in Korean analogy evidentiality

진우현|오명기
언어과학회 (The Linguistic Science Society)|2023.12|언어과학연구 (The Journal of Linguistics Science)|제107호|pp. 311-331

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

추정증거성evidentiality추론inferencepresumption행위주 제약증거성 충돌agent restrictionevidentiality collision
주제분류언어학

초록

This article explores the interaction between analogy and first-person agency in main clauses from an evidentiality perspective. In this context, evidentiality divides analogy into two distinct types: one being inference, which relies on external observation, and the other being presumption, which is rooted in internal introspection. This distinction sheds light on the limitations placed on the first-person agent in the process of understanding or recognizing. The paper introduces the notion of ‘Evidentiality Collision' (Plungian, 2001, 2010), a concept that deals with the discrepancies between a proposition's inherent evidentiality and the speaker's external evidentiality. The analysis is expected to provide a theoretical framework for comprehending the variations in how constraints on the first-person perspective are relaxed within these two types of analogical evidentiality, depending on different pragmatic contexts.

Abstract

This article explores the interaction between analogy and first-person agency in main clauses from an evidentiality perspective. In this context, evidentiality divides analogy into two distinct types: one being inference, which relies on external observation, and the other being presumption, which is rooted in internal introspection. This distinction sheds light on the limitations placed on the first-person agent in the process of understanding or recognizing. The paper introduces the notion of ‘Evidentiality Collision' (Plungian, 2001, 2010), a concept that deals with the discrepancies between a proposition's inherent evidentiality and the speaker's external evidentiality. The analysis is expected to provide a theoretical framework for comprehending the variations in how constraints on the first-person perspective are relaxed within these two types of analogical evidentiality, depending on different pragmatic contexts.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 김영희, "회상문의 인칭 제약과 책임성", 국어학, 10, pp.37~80 (1981)
  2. 김진웅, "한국어 증거성의 체계: 유형론을 중심으로", 한국어 의미학, 39, pp.101~124 (2012), 한국어의미학회
  3. 김차균, "국어 시제 형태소의 의미", 한글, 169, pp.45~116 (1980)
  4. 박수현, "증거성과 증거성 표지에 관한 소고", 프랑스어권 문화예술연구, 73, pp.206~240 (2020), 프랑스문화예술학회[DOI]
  5. 박재연, "한국어 양태 어미 연구" (2006), 태학사
  6. 송재목, "안맺음씨끝 ‘-더-’의 의미 기능에 대하여 : 유형론적 관점에서", 국어학, 32, pp.135~169 (1998)
  7. 송재목, "인식양태와 증거성", 한국어학, 44, pp.27~53 (2009), 한국어학회
  8. 송재목, "한국어 증거성표지의 중복실현", 비교문화연구, 22, pp.355~375 (2011), 비교문화연구소[DOI]
  9. 송재목, "증거성과 인칭의 상호작용", 한국언어학회 2014년 겨울학술대회 발표논문집, pp.117~126 (2014)
  10. 송재목, "증거성과 인칭의 상호작용", 언어학, (73), pp.111~132 (2015), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
  11. 신현숙, , -더라, 건국대학교 대학원 논문집, pp.1980, 11[DOI]
  12. 정인아, "한국어의 증거성(Evidentiality) 범주에 관한 연구", 박사, 한국언어문화, pp.2010
  13. 허세문, "On the Assertive Nature of Sentence Final Particle-ney : Direct Evidentiality and at-issue Variability", 현대문법학회·대한언어학회·언어과학회·한국언어정보학회·한국현대언어학회 2023년 봄 공동학술대회발표논문집, pp.112~122 (2023)
  14. Aikhenvald, A. Y, "Evidentiality" (2004), Oxford University Press
  15. Aikhenvald, A. Y., "The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic typology. Explorations in linguistic typology, vol. 7.", pp.1~50 (2014), Oxford University Press
  16. Aoki, H., "Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology", pp.223~238 (1986), Ablex Publishing Corporation
  17. Boas, F., "Handbook of American Indian languages, vol. 1", pp.423~558 (1911), Government Printing Office
  18. Boas, F., "General anthropology", pp.124~145 (1938), D. C. Heath and Company
  19. Bybee, J, "Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form" (1985), John Benjamins
  20. Chang S., "A generative study of discourse in Korean : On connecting sentences", Language Research, 9(2), pp.226~238 (1973)
  21. Chung, K.-S, "Space in tense: The interaction of tense, aspect, evidentiality and speech act in Korean", Doctor, pp.2005
  22. Curnow, T. J., "Types of interaction between evidentials and first person subjects", Antropological Linguistics, 44(2), pp.178~196 (2002)
  23. De Haan, F., "Evidentiality and epistemic modality : Setting boundaries", Southwest Journal of Llinguistics, 18(1), pp.83~101 (1999)
  24. Dendale, P., "Évidentialité ou non-prise en charge? Le cas du conditionnel épistémique en français. Une réanalyse", Langue Française, 200(4), pp.63~76 (2018)
  25. Du Bois, J. W, "Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology", pp.313~336 (1986), Ablex Publishing Corporation
  26. Hooper, J. B., "On the applicability of root transformations", Linguistic Inquiry, 4(4), pp.465~497 (1973)
  27. Jakobson, R., "Grammatical parallelism and its Russian facet", Language, 42, pp.399~429 (1966)
  28. Jakobson, R., "Word and language. Selected writings, vol. 2", pp.130~147 (1971), Mouton
  29. Kalsang, Garfield, J., "Direct evidentials, case, tense and aspect in Tibetan : Evidence for a general theory of the semantics of evidential", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 31(2), pp.517~561 (2013)
  30. Kim, M. S., "Evidential strategies in Korean conversations: An analysis of interactional and conversational narrative functions", Doctor, pp.2006
  31. Lakoff, G., "Adverb and modal operators", University of Michigan, ~ (1970)
  32. Lee, J., "Temporal constraints on the meaning of evidentiality", Natural Language Semantics, 21, pp.1~41 (2013)
  33. Mithun, M, "The languages of native North America" (1999), Cambridge University Press.
  34. Oswalt, R. L, "Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology", pp.29~45 (1986), Ablex Publishing Corporation
  35. Perlmutter, D, "Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax", Doctor, pp.1968
  36. Plungian, V., "The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space", Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), pp.349~357 (2001)
  37. Plungian, V., "Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European language", pp.15~58 (2010), Mouton de Gruyter
  38. San Roque, L., "The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area", Linguistic Typology, 16, pp.111~167 (2012)
  39. Speas, P., "On the syntax and semantics of evidentials", Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(5), pp.940~965 (2008)
  40. Sohn, H., "Retrospection in Korean", Language Research, 11(1), pp.87~103 (1975)
  41. Yang, I., "Korean syntax: Case markers, delimiters, complementation, and relativization" (1972), Paek Hap Sa
  42. Willet, T., "A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality", Studies in Language, 12(1), pp.51~97 (1988)

관련 논문AI추천

증거성과 인칭의 상호작용송재목사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2015 · 제73호한국어 증거성 표지의 화용론적 추론 의미강계림한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2015 · 제22권 제1호직접적 증거성과 추론적 증거성: 한국어의 '-더-'를 중심으로임동식사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2021 · 제91호한국어의 다양한 인칭 제약에 대한 소고허세문언어정보연구소 · 언어와 정보 사회2020 · 제40권 A Note on Korean Evidential -te-: Inference from Direct Perceptive Evidence임동식사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2013 · 제66호한국어의 어휘적 증거성송재목사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2018 · 제82호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)

Negativity and ambiguity in negative polar questions박범식, 오세랑pp. 1-24Emerging new grammatical paradigms in Korean: From nominals to sentence final particles백정혜pp. 25-44On anaphoric definiteness in Korean: A reassessment박명관pp. 45-66Investigating syntactic transfer in second language learning of neural language models김유희, 구건우pp. 67-81Morphologically governed accent in Standard Korean고언숙pp. 83-107
원문 보기