본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

저탄소 에너지 전환을 위한 2030년 최적전력구성비: 노후 원전 단계적 폐쇄와 INDC를 고려한 시나리오

The Optimal Energy Mix in South Korea’s Electricity Sector for Low Carbon Energy Transition in 2030: In Consideration of INDC and Sequential Shutdown of Decrepit Nuclear Power Plants

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류환경공학

초록

후쿠시마 사태 이후 형성된 원전에 대한 부정적인 여론은 몇몇 국가에서 ‘탈원전’이라는 정책으로표출됐다. 한국도 문재인 정부가 들어서면서 원전의 비중을 단계적으로 낮추는 에너지 정책 전환 계획을발표했다. 이로써 기후변화와 에너지 안보라는 두 가지 문제를 동시에 해결할 주요 에너지원으로 꼽혔던원전 사용에 제한이 발생했다. 이 연구는 원전의 단계적 폐쇄를 주요 내용으로 하는 에너지 정책 전환 이행과 기후변화체제라는 상황 속에서 2016년부터 2030년까지 한국의 최적전력구성비를 찾는 것이 목적이다. 최적전력구성비는 시간당 전력수요와 INDC를 최소비용으로 만족하는 구성비를 의미한다. 이 연구에서는선형계획법을 통해 에너지 정책 전환을 이행하는 시나리오와 원전을 2017년 수준으로 유지하는 시나리오로 나누어 비용을 비교분석했다. 그 결과 두 시나리오 모두 풍력은 2018년부터 꾸준히 증가하는 반면 태양광은 2021년부터 경제성을 갖춰 발전량이 대폭 늘어났다. 한편 총 비용은 에너지 전환 시나리오가 약56조원으로 원전 유지 시나리오에 비해 약 5.5조원 더 비싼 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract

After Fukushima incident, negative sentiment towards nuclear power has led to transition in policies that reduce the dependency on nuclear power in some countries. President Moon of Republic of Korea also announced a national plan of decommissioning retired nuclear power plants stage by stage. Therefore, nuclear power that once was considered the critical solution to energy security and climate change is now a limited option. This study aims to find an optimal energy mix in Korea’s electricity system from 2016 through 2030 to combat climate change through energy transition with minimum cost. The study is divided into two different scenarios; energy transition and nuclear sustenance, to compare the total costs of the systems. Both scenarios show that electricity generated by wind technology increases from 2018 whereas that of photovoltaic(PV) increases from 2021. However, the total cost of the energy transition scenario was USD 4.7 billion more expensive than the nuclear sustenance scenario.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. Connolly D, "A review of computer tools for analyzing the integration of renewable energy into various energy systems", Applied Energy, 87(4), pp.1059~1082 (2010)
  2. The SunShot initiative’s 2030 goal: 3¢ per kilowatt hour for solar electricity, "DOE", U.S. Department of Energy, ~ (2016)
  3. "DOE global energy storage database status operational" (2016)[URL]
  4. Capital cost estimates for utility scale electricity generating plants, "EIA", U.S. Department of Energy, ~ (2016)
  5. "Monthly renewable electricity generation surpasses nuclear for the first time since 1984" (2017)[URL]
  6. "Fuel cost"[URL]
  7. Biomass for heat and power: Opportunity and economics, "European Climate Foundation, Södra, Sveaskog, Vattenfall", European Climate Foundation, Södra. Sveaskog and Vattenfall, ~ (2010)
  8. Foley AM, "A strategic review of electricity systems models", Energy, 35(12), pp.4522~4530 (2010)
  9. Fraunhofer ISE, "Current and future cost of photovoltaics, long-term scenarios for market development, system prices and LCOE of utility-scale PV systems, study on behalf of Agora Energiewende", ~ (2015)
  10. "ENTIGRIS–Europe/Germany: Power System Development" (2016)[URL]
  11. Technology roadmap: Wind energy, "IEA", ~ (2013)
  12. Energy and climate change, "IEA", ~ (2015)
  13. CO2emissions from fuel combustion, "IEA", ~ (2016)
  14. Electricity storage technology brief, "IEA", ~ (2012)
  15. The 1st basic plan for climate change, "Joint Ministry of the Office for Government Policy Coordination", ~ (2016)
  16. 2016 New &Renewable Energy White Paper, "KEA", ~ (2016)
  17. The Monthly Report on Major Electric Power Statistics 2016.12, "KEPCO", ~ (2017)
  18. Q1 2017 Solar industry trends, "KEXIM", ~ (2017)
  19. Nuclear power white paper, "KHNP", ~ (2016)
  20. Shutdown of 10 coal-fired plants aged 30 years or older, "KMOTIE", ~ (2016)
  21. Kost C, "Renewable energy in North Africa:Modeling of future electricity scenarios and the impact on manufacturing and employment", PhD, pp.2015
  22. The 7th basic plan for long-term electricity supply and demand (2015-2029), "KPX", ~ (2015)
  23. Power plant shutdown statistics, "KPX", ~ (2016)
  24. Principles of sustainable energy systems, "Kreith F.", CRC Press, 2014
  25. Kryzia D, "Forecasting the price of uranium based on the costs of uranium deposits exploitation", The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, 32(3), pp.93~110 (2016)
  26. 권필석, "2030년 한국 온실가스 감축목표 달성을 위한 전력 부문 시나리오 분석", 환경정책, 25(2), pp.129~163 (2017), 한국환경정책학회[DOI]
  27. 권승문, "온실가스 감축과 사회적비용을 고려한 전력수급기본계획 연구", 환경정책, 24(4), pp.69~87 (2016), 한국환경정책학회[DOI]
  28. "Description of the REMIND model (Version 1.6)" (2015)[URL]
  29. "Distributed Generation Renewable Energy Estimate of Costs" (2016)[URL]
  30. "Electricity generation"[URL]
  31. Palzer A, "A Future German energy system with a dominating contribution from renewable energies: A holistic model based on hourly simulation", Energy Technology, 2, pp.13~28 (2014)
  32. Pfenninger S, "Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, pp.74~86 (2014)
  33. "Germany to shut all nuclear reactors" (2011)[URL]
  34. Schmid E, "REMINDD:A hybrid energy-economy model of Germany", Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Note di Lavoro, ~ (2012)
  35. Result on government-ruling party consultation on nuclear phase-out policy and following main energy issues, "The Minjoo Party of Korea Policy Committee", ~ (2017)
  36. UNFCCC, "Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC): Submission by the Republic of Korea on June 30", ~ (2015)
  37. Minimising greenhouse gas emissions from biomass energy generation, "United Kingdom Environment Agency", ~ (2009)
  38. World Bank commodities price forecast, "World Bank", The World Bank, ~ (2017)
  39. "Nuclear power in Taiwan" (2017)[URL]
  40. "Nuclear power in France" (2017)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)