본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

후원형 크라우드 펀딩에서의 목표 구배 효과; 프로젝트 카테고리 별 차이를 중심으로

Goal Gradient Effect in Reward-based Crowdfunding; Difference in Project Category

이재영|황지현|최강준|서승범
한국지식경영학회 (The Knowledge Management Society of Korea)|2019.09|지식경영연구 (Knowledge Management Research)|제20권 제3호|pp. 173-193|DOI 10.15813/kmr.2019.20.3.011

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Reward-based crowdfundingGoal gradient effectProject categoryUtilitarian/Hedonic project categoryKnowledge managements
주제분류경영학

초록

Reward-based crowdfunding is a funding platform that allows funds to be raised to early operators who have lack of funds, and is seen as an outstanding infrastructure that is going to lead the fourth industrial revolution in that it is a field of realization of new technologies and creative ideas by start-ups. Reward-based crowdfunding has grown in line with the trend of the fourth industrial revolution, and funding success cases are taking place in various industries that culture/art to technology/IT, including as a new means of knowledge management in a rapidly changing industrial environment. The study focused on the fact that consumer’s donation purposes may also vary depending on the category of projects classified as reward-based crowdfunding. Because consumer payment decisions and motivation of consumer purchasing behavior are classified according to the purpose of purchase, the previous papers that the goal gradient effect that the main motivation of consumer donation for reward-based crowdfunding introduced vary depending on project category of utilitarian and hedonic. In this study, consumer’s daily donation data is collected by Indiegogo which is a leading reward-based crowdfunding company using web-crawling and the model was defined as propensity score matching (PSM) and random effect model. The results showed that the goal gradient effect occurred in utilitarian project category, but no goal gradient effect for the hedonic project category. Furthermore, this paper developed the study of motivation of consumer donation and contributes theoretical foundation by the results consumer donation may vary depending on the project category; also, this paper has implications for an effective marketing strategy depending on the project category leaves real meaning to the projector.

Abstract

Reward-based crowdfunding is a funding platform that allows funds to be raised to early operators who have lack of funds, and is seen as an outstanding infrastructure that is going to lead the fourth industrial revolution in that it is a field of realization of new technologies and creative ideas by start-ups. Reward-based crowdfunding has grown in line with the trend of the fourth industrial revolution, and funding success cases are taking place in various industries that culture/art to technology/IT, including as a new means of knowledge management in a rapidly changing industrial environment. The study focused on the fact that consumer’s donation purposes may also vary depending on the category of projects classified as reward-based crowdfunding. Because consumer payment decisions and motivation of consumer purchasing behavior are classified according to the purpose of purchase, the previous papers that the goal gradient effect that the main motivation of consumer donation for reward-based crowdfunding introduced vary depending on project category of utilitarian and hedonic. In this study, consumer’s daily donation data is collected by Indiegogo which is a leading reward-based crowdfunding company using web-crawling and the model was defined as propensity score matching (PSM) and random effect model. The results showed that the goal gradient effect occurred in utilitarian project category, but no goal gradient effect for the hedonic project category. Furthermore, this paper developed the study of motivation of consumer donation and contributes theoretical foundation by the results consumer donation may vary depending on the project category; also, this paper has implications for an effective marketing strategy depending on the project category leaves real meaning to the projector.

참고문헌 (67)

  1. 문병준, "인터넷을 통한 소비자 정보탐색 및 구매행동에 영향을 주는 요인", 소비자학연구, 11(4), pp.131~151 (2000)
  2. 임지원, "한국형 크라우드 펀딩에 대한 연구", 한국경영학회 통합학술발표논문집, pp.102~124 (2014)
  3. 오소정, "후원형 크라우드펀딩과 그 효용성 -한국 텀블벅(Tumblbug)과 대만 플라잉브이(Flying V) 사례를 중심으로", 글로벌문화콘텐츠, (26), pp.115~130 (2017), 글로벌 문화콘텐츠학회
  4. 유창한, "문화예술 분야의 보상형 크라우드펀딩 성공 결정요인: 소셜 커뮤니케이션 활동 효과를 중심으로", 문화경제연구, 21(3), pp.31~58 (2018), 한국문화경제학회[DOI]
  5. 이규하, "인터넷 쇼핑몰에서 구전과 보증이 신뢰에 미치는 영향: 제품평가 용이성의 조절효과를 중심으로", 지식경영연구, 15(3), pp.141~168 (2014), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  6. 조은영, "소셜미디어 마케팅 실패사례 분석을 통한 소셜미디어 마케팅 전략 연구", 지식경영연구, 16(2), pp.91~111 (2015), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  7. 천혜숙, "창의적 프로젝트와 후원형 크라우드펀딩:성공요인", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 15(5), pp.560~569 (2015), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  8. Agrawal, A., "Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions", Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24(2), pp.253~274 (2015)
  9. Alba, J. W., "Pleasure principles: A review of research on hedonic consumption", Journal of consumer psychology, 23(1), pp.2~18 (2013)
  10. Babin, B. J., "Work and", or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value, 1994, pp.20(4), 644~656
  11. Baumeister, R. F., "Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior", Journal of consumer Research, 28(4), pp.670~676 (2002)
  12. Bandura, A., "Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation", Journal of personality and social psychology, 41(3), pp.586~ (1981)
  13. Carlo, G., "The interplay of traits and motives on volunteering: Agreeableness, extraversion and prosocial value motivation", Personality and Individual Differences, 38(6), pp.1293~1305 (2005)
  14. Childers, T. L., "Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior", Journal of retailing, 77(4), pp.511~535 (2001)
  15. Colombo, M. G., "Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding", Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 39(1), pp.75~100 (2015)
  16. Crowley, A. E., "Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attitudes toward product categories", Marketing letters, 3(3), pp.239~249 (1992)
  17. Dhar, R., "The effect of the focus of comparison on consumer preferences", Journal of Marketing Research, 29(4), pp.430~440 (1992)
  18. Dhar, R., "Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods", Journal of marketing research, 37(1), pp.60~71 (2000)
  19. Diehl, K., "Searching ordered sets: Evaluations from sequences under search", Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), pp.824~832 (2005)
  20. Duan, W., "Do online reviews matter?—An empirical investigation of panel data", Decision support systems, 45(4), pp.1007~1016 (2008)
  21. Dushnitsky, G., "Crowd monogamy", Business Strategy Review, 24(4), pp.24~26 (2013)
  22. Frydrych, D., "Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding", Venture Capital, 16(3), pp.247~269 (2014)
  23. Furnham, A., "Personality, motivation and job satisfaction: Hertzberg meets the Big Five", Journal of managerial psychology, 24(8), pp.765~779 (2009)
  24. Holbrook, M. B., "The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun", Journal of consumer research, 9(2), pp.132~140 (1982)
  25. Hong, Y., "How does social media affect contribution to public versus private goods in crowdfunding campaigns?", 2015 International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015 (2015), Association for Information Systems
  26. Hull, C. L., "The goal-gradient hypothesis and maze learning", Psychological Review, 39(1), pp.25~ (1932)
  27. Khan, U., "Inside consumption: Frontiers of research on consumer motives, goals, and desires (1)", pp.144~165 (2005)
  28. Klein, K., "Speaking to the mind or the heart: effects of matching hedonic versus utilitarian arguments and products", Marketing Letters, 27(1), pp.131~142 (2016)
  29. Koo, M., "The small-area hypothesis: Effects of progress monitoring on goal adherence", Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), pp.493~509 (2012)
  30. Kuppuswamy, V., "The Economics of Crowdfunding: Startups, Portals, and Investor Behavior" (2017)
  31. 김지하, "농산어촌 연중 돌봄학교 사업의 학업성취도 향상 효과 분석", 교육재정경제연구, 21(1), pp.191~222 (2012), 한국교육재정경제학회[DOI]
  32. Kivetz, R., "Repenting hyperopia: An analysis of self-control regrets", Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), pp.273~282 (2006)
  33. Kivetz, R., "The effects of incomplete information on consumer choice", Journal of Marketing Research, 37(4), pp.427~448 (2000)
  34. Kivetz, R., "The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention", Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), pp.39~58 (2006)
  35. Lewin, K., "Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers" (1951)
  36. Liu, W., "Focusing on desirability: The effect of decision interruption and suspension on preferences", Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), pp.640~652 (2008)
  37. Locke, E. A., "The directing function of goals in task performance", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(1), pp.35~42 (1969)
  38. Locke, E. A., "Goal setting: A motivational technique that works!" (1984)
  39. Locke, E. A., "Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey", American psychologist, 57(9), pp.705~ (2002)
  40. Locke, E. A., "Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980", Psychological bulletin, 90(1), pp.125~ (1981)
  41. Kraus, S., "Strategies for rewardbased crowdfunding campaigns", Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 1(1), pp.13~23 (2016)
  42. Martin, L. L., "Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation" (2014), Psychology Press
  43. Marom, D., "Are the life and death of a young start-up indeed in the power of the tongue? Lessons from online crowdfunding pitches", SSRN Electronic Journal (2013)
  44. Melnyk, V., "What’s in a name? Asymmetry of foreign branding effects in hedonic versus utilitarian product categories", Journal of Marketing, 76, pp.21~37 (2012)
  45. Mollick, E., "The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study", Journal of business venturing, 29(1), pp.1~16 (2014)
  46. Oh, J. H., "e-Checking Indoor Enviromental Air Control Systems based on Fuzzy Theory", Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference, pp.592~594 (2017), The Korea Institute of Information and Commucation Engineering
  47. Ordanini, A., "Crowd-funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms", Journal of service management, 22(4), pp.443~470 (2011)
  48. Payne, J., "Handbook of consumer behaviour", pp.50~84 (1991)
  49. Peterson, R. A., "Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing", Journal of the Academy of Marketing science, 25(4), pp.329~ (1997)
  50. Steinberg, D., "The Kickstarter handbook: Real-life crowdfunding success Stories" (2012), Quirk Books
  51. Strahilevitz, M., "Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell", Journal of consumer research, 24(4), pp.434~446 (1998)
  52. Suk, K., "The influence of price presentation order on consumer choice", Journal of Marketing Research, 49(5), pp.708~717 (2012)
  53. Taylor, G. C., "Claims reserving in nonlife insurance" (1986), North-Holland
  54. Ting, H., "The effects of goal distance and value in escalation of commitment", Current Psychology, 30(1), pp.93~104 (2011)
  55. Touré-Tillery, M., "The course of motivation", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(4), pp.414~423 (2011)
  56. Touré-Tillery, M., "The end justifies the means, but only in the middle", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), pp.570~ (2012)
  57. Trope, Y., "Temporal construal", Psychological review, 110(3), pp.403~ (2003)
  58. Vaughn, R., "How advertising works: A planning model", Journal of advertising research, 20(5), pp.27~33 (1980)
  59. Vesterlund, L., "The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2)", pp.168~190 (2006)
  60. Verhagen, T., "Perceived risk and trust associated with purchasing at electronic marketplaces", European Journal of Information Systems, 15(6), pp.542~555 (2006)
  61. Wakefield, K. L., "Situational price sensitivity: the role of consumption occasion, social context and income", Journal of Retailing, 79(4), pp.199~212 (2003)
  62. 이유재, "Mixed Products- How Adding Different Attributes Influences Consumer Perceptions and Product Evaluation", 아시아마케팅저널, 15(1), pp.83~106 (2013), 한국마케팅학회
  63. Zhang, J., "Rational herding in microloan markets", Management science, 58(5), pp.892~912 (2012)
  64. Zheng, H., "The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US", Information & Management, 51(4), pp.488~496 (2014)
  65. Zaichkowsky, J. L., "Measuring the involvement construct", Journal of consumer research, 12(3), pp.341~352 (1985)
  66. Zaichkowsky, J. L., "Conceptualizing involvement", Journal of advertising, 15(2), pp.4~34 (1986)
  67. Innovation Uncertainty and Indirect Network Externalities, "Zvilichovsky, D.", ~ (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

보상물 속성에 따른 목표 프레이밍이 후원형 크라우드 펀딩 참여 의도에 미치는 영향: 소비자의 지각된 목표와의 거리의 매개 효과를 중심으로안동균, 황지현한국전략마케팅학회 · 마케팅논집(Journal of Marketing Studies)2021 · 제29권 제3호후원형 크라우드 펀딩에서 목표 달성률이 추가 후원에 미치는 영향: 윤리적 소비에 따른 차이를 중심으로김수연, 이재영, 최윤섭한국소비자학회 · 소비자학연구2022 · 제33권 제4호성공 종료된 프로젝트의 리워드 만족도 연구: 보상형 크라우드펀딩을 중심으로표옥연한국진로·창업경영학회 · 한국진로창업경영학회지2022 · 제6권 제3호조절초점과 지각된 위험이 크라우드 펀딩 참여 의도에 미치는 영향이원준, 이한석, 이희정한국상품학회 · 상품학연구2015 · 제33권 제1호국내 크라우드펀딩 연구 동향 분석과 향후 연구과제: 연구 목적과 결과 중심으로이상윤, 이선희한국전략경영학회 · 전략경영연구2023 · 제26권 제1호보상형 크라우드 펀딩: 프로젝트의 펀딩 성공 이후 보상 약속 이행에 영향을 미치는 요인김승범, 최병철한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2016 · 제27권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

기업의 ICT투자가 ‘고용 없는 성장’을 이끄는가?정우진, 심재윤, 이종호, 박수호pp. 1-16고객서비스 정보시스템 재구축과 신규구축 성공에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 비교사례연구고준, 홍병선pp. 17-38다중반응표면최적화를 위한 공정능력함수법에서 최소치최대화 기준의 활용에 관한 연구정인준pp. 39-47팀 내외의 사회적 자본이 R&D 성과에 미치는 영향: 지식공유의 매개효과황호민, 이상곤pp. 49-71서울시 공공빅데이터 활성화 방안 연구엄태휘, 최봉, 윤종진pp. 73-89
원문 보기