Сахалин и ДВРФ как пространство исторических столкновении имежкультурнойкоммуникации

Abstract

‘Critical multiculturalism’ strives for harmonious coexistence while preserving the characteristics of cultures. Critical multiculturalism considers group differences as a product of social processes. It also approaches the problems of oppression, domination and discrimination by treating them as processes of society, rather than as individuals. It is very important, in my opinion, for us to know how the significance of the Russian Far East and Sakhalin as a multi cultural space was formed and is being formed. Sakhalin and the Far East are already long-developed regions in the cultural context which are based on the movement of remnants of different and diverse historical and cultural components from ancient times to our era. At the very least, we cannot safely refer to these neighboring Russian lands as monotonous and boring cultural spaces like some. Until now Korea itself is also, in my opinion, poor in the multi cultural sense, in the sense of competence of cultural dialogue and intercultural communication, compared to these Russian regions. This attitude touches both other spheres of life and the religious picture of these regions naturally. In some way, they are able to live more receptively to other races or other faiths, to a certain extent, than we or other nations in the Pacific-East Asia. The cultural opportunities formed in the Far East of Russia and Sakhalin are the result of the struggle, clash and cooperation of various peoples in the region. Cultural tolerance and tolerance of the Far East and Sakhalin will become and should become one of the exemplary roles of the cultural life of the North-East and East Asia, where, in my opinion, cultural bias, intolerance to foreign culture and foreign ways of life still prevail, where they strive to move towards the development of intercultural communication competence to the level of Sakhalin Island and the Russian Far East.