본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

진료수행시험에서 표준화 환자 채점의 정확도

Standardized Patients' Accuracy in Recording Checklist Items during Clinical Performance Examinations

1

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류기타의약학

초록

Abstract

Purpose: Standardized patients participate in clinical performance examinations not only to simulate case scenarios but also to evaluate the performance of students using a checklist. The accuracy in checking off checklist items is one of the most important factors determining the reliability of this examination. The purposes of this study were to determine the SP's overall accuracy in recording checklist items, and whether their accuracy was affected by certain characteristics of checklist items. Methods: Three professors, who have been fully involved in scenario development and SP training, reviewed videotapes of the examination and evaluated the performance of the students using the same checklist. SP's checklists were marked on this ‘correct checklist’. The checklists and checklist guidelines of the items marked under the score of 50 out of 100 were analyzed. Results: Results showed that the accuracy of the SP's in recording checklist items was 86.9% and was affected by certain characteristics, such as complexity or ambiguity of checklists and checklist guidelines. Conclusion: In this study, the SP's accuracy in recording checklist items was good to very good, and the result suggested that the accuracy could be improved by the elaboration of checklists and checklist guidelines.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. "일개 의과대학에서 실시한 표준화 환자를 이용한 임상수행능력평가시험 결과 분석", 16(1), pp.51~61 (2004)
  2. "객관구조화진료시험에서 교수와 표준화 환자 사이의 점검표 채점의 일치도", 15(2), pp.141~150 (2003)
  3. "Psychometric characteristics of the objective structured clinical examination", pp.335~41 (1988)
  4. "Measuring physician performance by using simulated patients", 60, pp.925~34 (1985)
  5. "Simulated patients in general practice a different look at the consultation", pp.809~12 (1987)
  6. "Evaluating the clinical skills of foreign medical school graduates participating in an internship preparation program", pp.391~4 (1990)
  7. "Sources of unreliability and bias in standardized patient rating Teaching and Lear ning in Medicine", pp.74~85 (1991)
  8. "patients' accuracy in recording clinical performance check-list items", pp.99~104 (1992)
  9. "standardized assessment of clinical competence", pp.482~9 (1987)

관련 논문AI추천

진료수행시험에거 시험기간 경과에 따른 표준화 환자 채점의 정확도 분석김석화, 김아름, 김연수, 김은아, 박완범, 신좌섭, 이성아, 이윤성, 장선영한국의학교육학회 · Korean Journal of Medical Education2007 · 제19권 제1호진료수행시험 평가자로서 표준화 환자 활용의 타당성김선, 박성환, 이수정, 허예라한국의학교육학회 · Korean Journal of Medical Education2005 · 제17권 제2호진료수행평가에서 증례유형과 표준화 환자 성별이 학생 성적에 미치는 영향김종훈, 양은배, 유동미, 이기영한국의학교육학회 · Korean Journal of Medical Education2007 · 제19권 제1호표준화 환자를 이용한 임상수행능력평가시험 (CPX)에서 교수와 표준화 환자의 평가 결과 비교권복규, 김나진, 박미혜, 박혜숙, 어은경, 오지영, 유경하, 이동현, 이순남, 한재진, 허정원한국의학교육학회 · Korean Journal of Medical Education2005 · 제17권 제2호표준화 환자를 이용한 진료수행시험에서 교수와 표준화 환자의 채점 정확도고진경, 김선미, 박재현, 유효빈한국의학교육학회 · Korean Journal of Medical Education2009 · 제21권 제3호객관구조화진료시험(OSCE)에서 전문 표준화 환자와 비전문 표준화 환자간의 비교연구고석봉, 고철우, 김대현, 나득영, 박성환, 박은희, 배종대, 손인기, 이춘기, 정기훈, 최은아한국의학교육학회 · Korean Journal of Medical Education2005 · 제17권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)