본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

진료수행평가에서 증례유형과 표준화 환자 성별이 학생 성적에 미치는 영향

Effects of case type and standardized patient gender on student performance in a clinical performance examination

이기영|유동미|양은배|김종훈
한국의학교육학회|2007.03|Korean Journal of Medical Education (korean journal of medical education)|제19권 제1호|pp. 23-30

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류기타의약학

초록

Abstract

=Effects of Case Type and Standardized Patient Gender on Student Performance in a Clinical Performance ExaminationJonghoon Kim, MD, Kiyoung Lee1, MD, Dongmi Yoo2, MA, Eunbae Yang2, PhD Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of case type and gender of standardized patient on student performance in a clinical performance examination(CPX). Methods: During 2005, an eight-station CPX was administered to fourth-year students from 4 medical schools. A total of 306 students, of which 206(67%) were male, participated in the exam. Station checklists, scored by the SPs, consisted of history taking(Hx), physical examination(PE), information sharing(IS), clinical courtesy(CC) and patient-physician interaction(PPI). A measurement of students’ perceived difficulty was obtained through student questionnaires. The difference of CPX scores between male and female students were studied using Mann-Whitney's U. Results: Across the gender-neutral cases, female students scored better in Hx in 2 cases. In PE, IS and CC, the only difference seen was with CC in 1 case(female students scored higher). In PPI, female students performed better than male students in all female SP cases and one male SP case, but, there was a significant student gender-SP gender interaction when averaging all cases. For the gender sensitive case, there was no significant difference in all checklist categories in the male case when student gender was considered. In the female case, female students performed better than male students only in PPI. Student questionnaires revealed that there was no significant difference in perceived difficulty between male and female students. Conclusion: The standardized patients' ratings in gender sensitive cases are not affected by the gender of standardized patients and students, except in PPI with a female case where female students performed better than male students.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. "Are interpersonal skills ratings influenced by gender in a clinical skills assessment using standardized patients?", 6(3), pp.231~241 (2001)
  2. "The interaction of student gender and standardized-patient gender on a per formance-based examination of clinical competence", pp.9~ (1991)
  3. "Effects of examinee gender and their interaction on standardized patients' ratings of examinees' interpersonal and communication skill", pp.153~157 (1993)
  4. "Effects of student gender standardized-patient gender in a single case using a male and a female standardized patient", pp.301~303 (1993)
  5. "Gender, sequence of cases and day effects on clinical skills assessment with standardized patients", 33, pp.499~503 (1999)
  6. "An OSCE for summative assessment after clinical clerkship: Experience in Ewha medical school", 16(1), pp.33~40 (2004)
  7. "An analysis of standardized patient checklist errors and effects on student scores", 37(2), pp.99~104 (2003)
  8. "Comparison of professional standardized and amateur standardized patients in OSCE", 17(1), pp.97~105 (2005)
  9. "The effects of information sharing between students on results of clinical performance examination", 18(3), pp.239~247 (2006)
  10. "The Appropriateness of using standardized patients' (SPs) assessment scores in clinical performance examination(CPX)", 17(2), pp.163~172 (2005)
  11. "Do women medical students outperform men in obstetrics and gynecology?", 73(11), pp.1125~ (1998)
  12. "Experience of objective structured clinical examination in Gyeong-Sang national university college of medicine", 17(3), pp.249~256 (2005)
  13. "Difference in clinical experiences based on gender of third-year medical students in a required family medicine preceptorship", 77(12 Pt 1), pp.1241~1246 (2002)
  14. "The agreement of checklist recordings between faculties and standardized patients in an objective structured clinical examination(OSCE)", 15(2), pp.141~150 (2003)
  15. "Sharing of information among students and its effect on the scores of clinical performance examination(CPX)", 17(2), pp.185~196 (2005)
  16. "Comparison of results from objective structured clinical examinations for medical students performed nefore and after clinical clerkship", 16(1), pp.63~71 (2004)
  17. "Correlation of CPX scores with the scores of the clinical clerkship assessments and written examinations", 17(3), pp.297~303 (2005)
  18. "The influence of student and standardized patient genders on scoring in an objective structured clinical examination", pp.9~ (1991)
  19. "Standardized patients´ accuracy in recording checklist items during clinical performance examinations", 17(2), pp.197~203 (2005)
  20. "Sources of unreliability and bias in standardized patients rating", pp.74~85 (1991)
  21. "Use of standardized examinees to screen for standardized patient scoring bias in a clinical skills examination", 17(1), pp.9~13 (2005)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

의사양성정책안덕선pp. 1-4우리나라 의과대학에서의 인문사회의학교육: 과제와 전망맹광호pp. 5-11내과 임상실습에서 문제바탕학습을 응용한 항생제 교육신좌섭, 이윤성, 김남중, 오명돈, 최강원, 김홍빈, 박완범pp. 13-21시험 시기에 따른 임상수행능력평가 점수 비교이순남, 유경하, 김경효, 김나진, 한재진, 박혜숙, 정재은, 어은경, 권복규pp. 31-38진료수행시험에거 시험기간 경과에 따른 표준화 환자 채점의 정확도 분석이윤성, 장선영, 김석화, 박완범, 신좌섭, 김은아, 이성아, 김연수, 김아름pp. 39-45
원문 보기