본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

진료수행시험에거 시험기간 경과에 따른 표준화 환자 채점의 정확도 분석

The accuracy of standardized patients' rating according to the order of examinees in clinical performance examination

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류기타의약학

초록

Abstract

=The Accuracy of Standardized Patients’ Rating accordingto the Order of Examinees in Clinical Performance ExaminationWan Beom Park, MD, PhD, Ah Reum Kim, BA, Sung A Lee, RN, MS, Eun A Kim, BA, Sun-young Chang1, BA, Yon Su Kim2, MD, PhD, Suk Wha Kim3, MD, PhD, Jwa-Seop Shin, MD, EdD, Yoon Sung Lee, MD, PhDOffice of Medical Education, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of standardized patients’(SP) rating according to the order of examinees in clinical performance examination. Methods: In the clinical performance examination which was administered in 2005 at Seoul National University College of Medicine, each SP evaluated 16 students consecutively. For all 16 SPs(2 SPs per station), accuracy of rating was evaluated by comparing the individual records of each SP to the ‘recording keys’ made by two SPs from reviewing a video recording of performances by examinees. Results: The average number of items incorrectly rated by SP was 3.8(range, 0~12), 2.8 in female SPs and 4.8 in male SPs(p<0.001). No statistical correlation was observed between the number of errors and the order of examinees(p=0.843). Even after stratification by gender or age of the SPs or domains of examination, the number of items incorrectly rated did not differ significantly according to the order of examinees. Conclusion: An increase in SP’s rating error with time after the start of examinations was not observed within the 16 consecutive encounters in clinical performance examination. The effect of SP’s fatigue on the accuracy of simulation as an examination progresses remains to be studied.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. "Anoverview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills", pp.443~453 (1993)
  2. "Evaluation of physical examination skills reliability of faculty observers and patient instructors", pp.3405~3408 (1987)
  3. "The appropriateness of using standardized patients' (SPs) assessment scores in clinical performance examination (CPX)", 17(2), pp.163~172 (2005)
  4. "Comparison of the evaluation results of faculty with those of standardized patients in a clinical performance examination experience", 17(2), pp.173~183 (2005)
  5. "Measuring physician performance by using simulated patients", pp.925~934 (1985)
  6. "Simulated patients in general practice a different look at the consultation", pp.809~12 (1987)
  7. "Standardized patients’ accuracy in recording checklist items during clinical performance examinations", 17(2), pp.197~203 (2005)
  8. "Sources of unreliability and bias in standardized patient rating", pp.74~85 (1991)
  9. "patients’accuracy in recording clinical performance check-list items", pp.99~104 (1992)
  10. "Clinical performance-based test sensitivity and specificity in predicting first-year residency performance" (1993)
  11. "standardized assessment of clinical competence", pp.482~489 (1987)

관련 논문AI추천

진료수행시험에서 표준화 환자 채점의 정확도박훈기, 신좌섭, 이성아한국의학교육학회 · Korean Journal of Medical Education2005 · 제17권 제2호진료수행시험 평가자로서 표준화 환자 활용의 타당성김선, 박성환, 이수정, 허예라한국의학교육학회 · Korean Journal of Medical Education2005 · 제17권 제2호진료수행평가에서 증례유형과 표준화 환자 성별이 학생 성적에 미치는 영향김종훈, 양은배, 유동미, 이기영한국의학교육학회 · Korean Journal of Medical Education2007 · 제19권 제1호표준화 환자를 이용한 임상수행능력평가시험 (CPX)에서 교수와 표준화 환자의 평가 결과 비교권복규, 김나진, 박미혜, 박혜숙, 어은경, 오지영, 유경하, 이동현, 이순남, 한재진, 허정원한국의학교육학회 · Korean Journal of Medical Education2005 · 제17권 제2호객관구조화진료시험(OSCE)에서 전문 표준화 환자와 비전문 표준화 환자간의 비교연구고석봉, 고철우, 김대현, 나득영, 박성환, 박은희, 배종대, 손인기, 이춘기, 정기훈, 최은아한국의학교육학회 · Korean Journal of Medical Education2005 · 제17권 제1호일개 의과대학에서 실시한 표준화환자 (SP)를 이용한 임상수행능력평가시험 (CPX) 결과 분석김주자, 이경재, 이동환, 최규연한국의학교육학회 · Korean Journal of Medical Education2004 · 제16권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)